Effects of calcium cyanamide on Collembola in a standardized field test: Part 1. Rationale and performance of the study

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Environmental Science Environmental Sciences Europe Pub Date : 2021-11-20 DOI:10.1186/s12302-021-00571-2
Petra Stegger, Jörg Römbke, Jörg-Alfred Salamon, Klaus Peter Ebke
{"title":"Effects of calcium cyanamide on Collembola in a standardized field test: Part 1. Rationale and performance of the study","authors":"Petra Stegger,&nbsp;Jörg Römbke,&nbsp;Jörg-Alfred Salamon,&nbsp;Klaus Peter Ebke","doi":"10.1186/s12302-021-00571-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A field study lasting one year was performed to study the effects of a calcium cyanamide fertiliser (trade name: Perlka®) on Collembola in order to support the terrestrial risk assessment under the REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) regulation. Due to the lack of an appropriate guidance document, the design of the study was based on the ISO Guideline 11268–3, originally developed for earthworm field studies. However, the sampling procedure was adapted accordingly by applying ISO Guideline 23611–2, i.e. taking soil core and pitfall trap samples. Two groups of four plots each were treated with 200 kg/ha and 400 kg/ha Perlka®, respectively. A third group served as a fertiliser control, i.e. it was treated with a standard urea fertiliser (172.9 kg Piagran®/ha) at the same total nitrogen rate (79.5 kg/ha) as provided by the high Perlka® application rate. The fourth group served as negative control without any fertiliser treatment and the fifth group was treated with the reference item Agriclor® (480 g a.i./L chlorpyrifos), known to be toxic to springtails.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In total 16 different Collembola species were determined. For seven species, covering all life form types, a reliable statistical evaluation was possible, which was reflected in correspondingly low MDD values in the study. A statistically significant decrease of the abundance (at least 50%) on the reference item plots compared to the untreated control was observed for six species, thus demonstrating the sensitivity of the Collembola community.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>No long-lasting effects of the Perlka® application rates could be observed for any of the Collembola species. In order to support risk assessors in both industry and authorities in the interpretation of large and complex data sets typical for field studies with chemicals, further guidance on implementation and data interpretation is urgently needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54293,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-021-00571-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-021-00571-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A field study lasting one year was performed to study the effects of a calcium cyanamide fertiliser (trade name: Perlka®) on Collembola in order to support the terrestrial risk assessment under the REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) regulation. Due to the lack of an appropriate guidance document, the design of the study was based on the ISO Guideline 11268–3, originally developed for earthworm field studies. However, the sampling procedure was adapted accordingly by applying ISO Guideline 23611–2, i.e. taking soil core and pitfall trap samples. Two groups of four plots each were treated with 200 kg/ha and 400 kg/ha Perlka®, respectively. A third group served as a fertiliser control, i.e. it was treated with a standard urea fertiliser (172.9 kg Piagran®/ha) at the same total nitrogen rate (79.5 kg/ha) as provided by the high Perlka® application rate. The fourth group served as negative control without any fertiliser treatment and the fifth group was treated with the reference item Agriclor® (480 g a.i./L chlorpyrifos), known to be toxic to springtails.

Results

In total 16 different Collembola species were determined. For seven species, covering all life form types, a reliable statistical evaluation was possible, which was reflected in correspondingly low MDD values in the study. A statistically significant decrease of the abundance (at least 50%) on the reference item plots compared to the untreated control was observed for six species, thus demonstrating the sensitivity of the Collembola community.

Conclusion

No long-lasting effects of the Perlka® application rates could be observed for any of the Collembola species. In order to support risk assessors in both industry and authorities in the interpretation of large and complex data sets typical for field studies with chemicals, further guidance on implementation and data interpretation is urgently needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氰胺钙在标准化田间试验中对弹尾虫的影响:第1部分。研究的理由和表现
背景为了支持 REACH(化学品注册、评估、许可和限制)法规下的陆地风险评估,我们开展了一项为期一年的实地研究,以了解氰氨化钙肥料(商品名:Perlka®)对鞘翅目昆虫的影响。由于缺乏适当的指导文件,研究设计以最初为蚯蚓实地研究制定的 ISO 11268-3 指南为基础。不过,对取样程序进行了相应调整,采用了 ISO 指南 23611-2,即采集土壤核心样本和坑式陷阱样本。两组各四块地,每组分别用 200 公斤/公顷和 400 公斤/公顷的 Perlka® 处理。第三组作为肥料对照,即施用标准尿素肥料(172.9 千克 Piagran®/公顷),总氮量(79.5 千克/公顷)与高 Perlka® 施用量相同。第四组作为阴性对照,不施用任何肥料,第五组施用对春梢蛇有毒的 Agriclor®(480 克活性/升毒死蜱)。其中 7 个物种涵盖了所有生命形式类型,可以进行可靠的统计评估,这反映在研究中相应的 MDD 值较低。与未处理的对照组相比,有 6 个物种在参照物地块上的丰度出现了统计学意义上的显著下降(至少 50%),从而证明了褶菌群落的敏感性。为了支持工业界和当局的风险评估人员解释化学品实地研究中典型的大量复杂数据集,迫切需要进一步的实施和数据解释指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
期刊最新文献
Towards the global plastic treaty: a clue to the complexity of plastics in practice Chronic toxicity testing including transcriptomics-based molecular profiling in Cloeon dipterum Environmental impact of quarrying on air quality in Ebonyi state, Nigeria How does high-speed railway affect green technology innovation? A perspective of high-quality human capital Management of links of interest in European Union expertise authorities dealing with plant protection products: comparative analysis and recommendations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1