Toward Deeper Understanding of Children’s Writing: Pre-Service Teachers’ Attention to Local and Global Text Features at the Start and End of Writing-Focused Coursework

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Literacy Research and Instruction Pub Date : 2021-08-17 DOI:10.1080/19388071.2021.1941445
Lisa K. Hawkins, Nicole M. Martin, Diane Bottomley, Brenda Shanahan, J. Cooper
{"title":"Toward Deeper Understanding of Children’s Writing: Pre-Service Teachers’ Attention to Local and Global Text Features at the Start and End of Writing-Focused Coursework","authors":"Lisa K. Hawkins, Nicole M. Martin, Diane Bottomley, Brenda Shanahan, J. Cooper","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2021.1941445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This mixed methods study sought to extend what is known about preservice teachers’ [PSTs’] enactment of the core practice of reading and responding to students’ writing by examining their reading of elementary students’ writing at the start and end of writing-focused methods coursework. PSTs’ reading of students’ writing involves analysis of children’s writing strengths and needs and undergirds their teaching of writing, influencing their feedback and instructional decision-making. Participants included 115 elementary PSTs. Their identifications of local and global text features on a beginning- and end-of-semester assessment task were examined. Overall, PSTs showcased differences in their reading of children’s writing at the two time points, displaying a lessened focus on local features (e.g., spelling, punctuation) and a greater focus on global features (e.g., content, structure) at the end of the semester. This trend was especially apparent in their identification of children’s instructional needs. Moreover, PSTs’ reading of children’s informative and persuasive writing tended to be similar to their reading of children’s narrative writing at both time points. The results offer insight into the text features PSTs make available for use in their subsequent responding and suggest the importance of highlighting global text features among children’s instructional needs.","PeriodicalId":45434,"journal":{"name":"Literacy Research and Instruction","volume":"61 1","pages":"209 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy Research and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.1941445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This mixed methods study sought to extend what is known about preservice teachers’ [PSTs’] enactment of the core practice of reading and responding to students’ writing by examining their reading of elementary students’ writing at the start and end of writing-focused methods coursework. PSTs’ reading of students’ writing involves analysis of children’s writing strengths and needs and undergirds their teaching of writing, influencing their feedback and instructional decision-making. Participants included 115 elementary PSTs. Their identifications of local and global text features on a beginning- and end-of-semester assessment task were examined. Overall, PSTs showcased differences in their reading of children’s writing at the two time points, displaying a lessened focus on local features (e.g., spelling, punctuation) and a greater focus on global features (e.g., content, structure) at the end of the semester. This trend was especially apparent in their identification of children’s instructional needs. Moreover, PSTs’ reading of children’s informative and persuasive writing tended to be similar to their reading of children’s narrative writing at both time points. The results offer insight into the text features PSTs make available for use in their subsequent responding and suggest the importance of highlighting global text features among children’s instructional needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加深对儿童写作的理解:职前教师在写作课程开始和结束时对本地和全球文本特征的关注
本混合方法研究旨在通过考察职前教师在以写作为中心的方法课程开始和结束时对小学生写作的阅读,来扩展他们对阅读核心实践的制定和对学生写作的回应。教师对学生写作的阅读涉及对儿童写作优势和需求的分析,是教师写作教学的基础,影响教师的反馈和教学决策。参与者包括115名初级pst。他们在学期初和学期末的评估任务中对局部和全局文本特征的识别进行了检查。总体而言,教师们在两个时间点上对孩子写作的阅读表现出了差异,在学期结束时,教师们对局部特征(如拼写、标点)的关注有所减少,而对整体特征(如内容、结构)的关注有所增加。这一趋势在他们对儿童教育需求的确定上尤为明显。此外,在两个时间点上,小学教师对儿童信息性和说服性写作的阅读倾向于与他们对儿童叙事性写作的阅读相似。研究结果揭示了教师在后续回应中使用的文本特征,并建议在儿童教学需求中突出整体文本特征的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy Research and Instruction
Literacy Research and Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction), the official journal of the College Reading Association, is an international refereed professional journal that publishes articles dealing with research and instruction in reading education and allied literacy fields. The journal is especially focused on instructional practices and applied or basic research of special interest to reading and literacy educators. Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by reviewers.
期刊最新文献
Empowering Adolescent Emergent Readers in Government Schools: An Exploration of Multimodal Texts as Pathways to Comprehension Novice Teachers’ Knowledge of Racial Literacies Effect of Dramatic Storytelling on Emergent Literacy in EFL: Evidence from the UAE Kindergartens Reexamining the Dolch Basic Sight Word List: Contemporary Considerations for Culturally Sustaining Approaches to Assess Sight Word Development A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Synchronous Paired Oral Reading Techniques in Elementary Classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1