Toward Deeper Understanding of Children’s Writing: Pre-Service Teachers’ Attention to Local and Global Text Features at the Start and End of Writing-Focused Coursework
Lisa K. Hawkins, Nicole M. Martin, Diane Bottomley, Brenda Shanahan, J. Cooper
{"title":"Toward Deeper Understanding of Children’s Writing: Pre-Service Teachers’ Attention to Local and Global Text Features at the Start and End of Writing-Focused Coursework","authors":"Lisa K. Hawkins, Nicole M. Martin, Diane Bottomley, Brenda Shanahan, J. Cooper","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2021.1941445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This mixed methods study sought to extend what is known about preservice teachers’ [PSTs’] enactment of the core practice of reading and responding to students’ writing by examining their reading of elementary students’ writing at the start and end of writing-focused methods coursework. PSTs’ reading of students’ writing involves analysis of children’s writing strengths and needs and undergirds their teaching of writing, influencing their feedback and instructional decision-making. Participants included 115 elementary PSTs. Their identifications of local and global text features on a beginning- and end-of-semester assessment task were examined. Overall, PSTs showcased differences in their reading of children’s writing at the two time points, displaying a lessened focus on local features (e.g., spelling, punctuation) and a greater focus on global features (e.g., content, structure) at the end of the semester. This trend was especially apparent in their identification of children’s instructional needs. Moreover, PSTs’ reading of children’s informative and persuasive writing tended to be similar to their reading of children’s narrative writing at both time points. The results offer insight into the text features PSTs make available for use in their subsequent responding and suggest the importance of highlighting global text features among children’s instructional needs.","PeriodicalId":45434,"journal":{"name":"Literacy Research and Instruction","volume":"61 1","pages":"209 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy Research and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.1941445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT This mixed methods study sought to extend what is known about preservice teachers’ [PSTs’] enactment of the core practice of reading and responding to students’ writing by examining their reading of elementary students’ writing at the start and end of writing-focused methods coursework. PSTs’ reading of students’ writing involves analysis of children’s writing strengths and needs and undergirds their teaching of writing, influencing their feedback and instructional decision-making. Participants included 115 elementary PSTs. Their identifications of local and global text features on a beginning- and end-of-semester assessment task were examined. Overall, PSTs showcased differences in their reading of children’s writing at the two time points, displaying a lessened focus on local features (e.g., spelling, punctuation) and a greater focus on global features (e.g., content, structure) at the end of the semester. This trend was especially apparent in their identification of children’s instructional needs. Moreover, PSTs’ reading of children’s informative and persuasive writing tended to be similar to their reading of children’s narrative writing at both time points. The results offer insight into the text features PSTs make available for use in their subsequent responding and suggest the importance of highlighting global text features among children’s instructional needs.
期刊介绍:
Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction), the official journal of the College Reading Association, is an international refereed professional journal that publishes articles dealing with research and instruction in reading education and allied literacy fields. The journal is especially focused on instructional practices and applied or basic research of special interest to reading and literacy educators. Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by reviewers.