Algorithm for Calculating the Inspection Interval of a Process Pipeline using a Risk-Oriented Approach according to the API 581 Methodology

A. Brikov, S.I. Aleksandrovich, D.S. Belkin, A.M. Shteyn, S.P. Osipov
{"title":"Algorithm for Calculating the Inspection Interval of a Process Pipeline using a Risk-Oriented Approach according to the API 581 Methodology","authors":"A. Brikov, S.I. Aleksandrovich, D.S. Belkin, A.M. Shteyn, S.P. Osipov","doi":"10.24000/0409-2961-2023-4-75-83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the actual problems of planning periodic inspections of the equipment. The main task of the inspection is to assess the actual and (or) predicted technical condition of the equipment by carrying out design, experimental (diagnostic), research and organizational actions. Inspection can be implemented based on of one of two approaches: regulated and risk-oriented. The methodology given in the API 581 standard is used as the basis for conducting inspections. According to this methodology, risk is defined as a combination of probability and consequences of failure. An example is given related to calculating the inspection interval of the object under study. According to its results, the target date for the next inspection of the facility is set 8 years after the start of its operation. The article compares inspection methods based on two different approaches. It is shown that a risk-oriented approach implies a more deep and detailed study of the objects using the advanced methods, including continuous ultrasound scanning, profile (digital) radiography, pulsed eddy current testing. It is indicated that the efficiency of inspection methods used in the risk-oriented approach is due to their choice, considering the mechanisms of degradation of the object and depending on the specific conditions of its operation. Based on the results of the conducted work, it was concluded that the methodology for calculating inspection intervals based on the API 581 standard is an effective tool to ensure the optimal level of risk. With the development of the methods for organizing production, the methods for ensuring its safety should also be improved. The fact is noted that the application of the methodology of the risk-oriented approach in the Russian Federation is currently complicated due to the lack of an appropriate regulatory framework and methodological support. The emphasis was made on the need to resolve this problem, which will invariably lead to an increase in the efficiency of industrial production, including by the reduction of the equipment downtime during the preparation and conduct of the inspection.","PeriodicalId":35650,"journal":{"name":"Bezopasnost'' Truda v Promyshlennosti","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bezopasnost'' Truda v Promyshlennosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24000/0409-2961-2023-4-75-83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the actual problems of planning periodic inspections of the equipment. The main task of the inspection is to assess the actual and (or) predicted technical condition of the equipment by carrying out design, experimental (diagnostic), research and organizational actions. Inspection can be implemented based on of one of two approaches: regulated and risk-oriented. The methodology given in the API 581 standard is used as the basis for conducting inspections. According to this methodology, risk is defined as a combination of probability and consequences of failure. An example is given related to calculating the inspection interval of the object under study. According to its results, the target date for the next inspection of the facility is set 8 years after the start of its operation. The article compares inspection methods based on two different approaches. It is shown that a risk-oriented approach implies a more deep and detailed study of the objects using the advanced methods, including continuous ultrasound scanning, profile (digital) radiography, pulsed eddy current testing. It is indicated that the efficiency of inspection methods used in the risk-oriented approach is due to their choice, considering the mechanisms of degradation of the object and depending on the specific conditions of its operation. Based on the results of the conducted work, it was concluded that the methodology for calculating inspection intervals based on the API 581 standard is an effective tool to ensure the optimal level of risk. With the development of the methods for organizing production, the methods for ensuring its safety should also be improved. The fact is noted that the application of the methodology of the risk-oriented approach in the Russian Federation is currently complicated due to the lack of an appropriate regulatory framework and methodological support. The emphasis was made on the need to resolve this problem, which will invariably lead to an increase in the efficiency of industrial production, including by the reduction of the equipment downtime during the preparation and conduct of the inspection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据API 581方法使用风险导向方法计算过程管道检查间隔的算法
这篇文章专门讨论了计划定期检查设备的实际问题。检查的主要任务是通过进行设计、实验(诊断)、研究和组织行动,评估设备的实际和(或)预测技术条件。检查可以基于两种方法中的一种来实施:监管和风险导向。API 581标准中给出的方法被用作进行检查的基础。根据这种方法,风险被定义为失败的概率和后果的组合。给出了一个计算被研究对象检查间隔的例子。根据其结果,该设施下一次检查的目标日期是在开始运营8年后。本文比较了基于两种不同方法的检测方法。研究表明,以风险为导向的方法意味着使用先进的方法对物体进行更深入和详细的研究,包括连续超声扫描、轮廓(数字)射线照相、脉冲涡流检测。研究表明,风险导向方法中使用的检查方法的效率取决于它们的选择,考虑到物体退化的机制,并取决于其运行的具体条件。根据所开展工作的结果,得出的结论是,根据API 581标准计算检查间隔的方法是确保最佳风险水平的有效工具。随着组织生产方法的发展,确保其安全的方法也应该改进。值得注意的是,由于缺乏适当的监管框架和方法支持,目前俄罗斯联邦采用风险导向方法的工作十分复杂。强调了解决这一问题的必要性,这必然会提高工业生产的效率,包括减少检查准备和进行期间的设备停机时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bezopasnost'' Truda v Promyshlennosti
Bezopasnost'' Truda v Promyshlennosti Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
期刊最新文献
Analytical Methodology for Substantiating the Optimal Frequency of Scheduled Inspections of the Fire-fighting Condition of Industrial and Warehouse Buildings Increasing Geodynamic Safety by Managing Induced Seismicity During the Development of Solid Mineral Deposits Critique and Improvement of the Regulatory Framework on the Calculation of Structures for Seismic Impacts On the Problem of the Large Tires Safe Operation Improving the Labor Safety of Mining Dump Truck Drivers by Reducing the Risk of Failure of the Functional Units of the Traction Electric Drive under Operating Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1