Online program management and potential principal-agent problems

IF 2.4 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION Pub Date : 2022-08-10 DOI:10.1080/15236803.2022.2105089
Clayton Wukich
{"title":"Online program management and potential principal-agent problems","authors":"Clayton Wukich","doi":"10.1080/15236803.2022.2105089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Enrollment pressures and other considerations spur Master of Public Administration online offerings, and specific skillsets are needed for implementation. Online program management providers (OPMs) are for-profit companies that bundle services to establish academic programs in exchange for tuition revenue sharing agreements, upfront fees, or a combination of the two. In such relationships, principal-agent problems may arise in which a company’s profit motives conflict with a university’s larger set of goals and, as a result, stakeholders should recognize the dynamic. However, the lack of industry transparency and emerging business models impede easy understanding. Analysis of contracts obtained through open records requests and other documents (a) identifies available services and (b) reveals potential problems as well as mitigation tactics. Findings contribute to our understanding of what OPM agreements entail, including the contributions made by faculty and other university personnel.","PeriodicalId":46422,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2022.2105089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Enrollment pressures and other considerations spur Master of Public Administration online offerings, and specific skillsets are needed for implementation. Online program management providers (OPMs) are for-profit companies that bundle services to establish academic programs in exchange for tuition revenue sharing agreements, upfront fees, or a combination of the two. In such relationships, principal-agent problems may arise in which a company’s profit motives conflict with a university’s larger set of goals and, as a result, stakeholders should recognize the dynamic. However, the lack of industry transparency and emerging business models impede easy understanding. Analysis of contracts obtained through open records requests and other documents (a) identifies available services and (b) reveals potential problems as well as mitigation tactics. Findings contribute to our understanding of what OPM agreements entail, including the contributions made by faculty and other university personnel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线项目管理与潜在的委托代理问题
摘要招生压力和其他考虑因素刺激了公共管理硕士的在线课程,实施需要特定的技能。在线课程管理提供商(OPM)是一家营利性公司,将建立学术课程的服务捆绑在一起,以换取学费收入共享协议、预付费或两者的结合。在这种关系中,可能会出现委托代理问题,即公司的利润动机与大学的更大目标相冲突,因此,利益相关者应该认识到这种动态。然而,缺乏行业透明度和新兴的商业模式阻碍了人们的理解。对通过公开记录请求和其他文件获得的合同的分析(a)确定了可用的服务,(b)揭示了潜在的问题以及缓解策略。研究结果有助于我们理解人事管理协议的内容,包括教师和其他大学人员的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
36.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Observation and reporting: a teaching case on implicit bias and decision fallacies Keeping the academy queer: Lessons from the queer community for the future of public affairs education Enhancing doctoral training with reflexive practices: Insights from a collaborative autoethnography River city cuts back: A balancing act simulation Preparing future nonprofit social enterprise leaders: a research-based instructional needs analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1