Spoiled Apples: A Letter to White Scholars Eager to “Adopt” Black Scholars

IF 4.1 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Management Inquiry Pub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI:10.1177/10564926211052212
Dennis A. Gioia
{"title":"Spoiled Apples: A Letter to White Scholars Eager to “Adopt” Black Scholars","authors":"Dennis A. Gioia","doi":"10.1177/10564926211052212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the following essay, this author affirms in no uncertain terms that academia is (still) afflicted with entrenched racism and that the often-covert racism is systemic – i.e., built into the structures and processes of our institutions. It is also populated with ostensibly well-intended white scholars who negatively affect the careers of Black scholars in ways not necessarily apparent to most of us. Yet, we scholars are supposed to be the most enlightened of all professionals about such issues. This anonymous essay is a slap-in-the-face reminder that we are not. At least not from the point of view of the relatively few Black members of our profession– and their point of view is the one that matters most when it comes to this issue. I encourage you to listen up, even if the message is one you might not be comfortable hearing. Some of you might have noticed that the recent series of essays in the Provocations and Provocateurs section of JMI represents my attempt to give voice to different minorities in academia (international scholars, women scholars, Black scholars, and soon LGBTQ scholars). I hope it is not lost on readers of this section that two of the three writers have chosen to write anonymously. Anonymous #1, who wrote about the experiences of women in academia, chose to write without identifying herself to protect the guilty (to avoid offending people she otherwise admires for other reasons). Anonymous #2, a Black scholar, chose to write anonymously because s/he feared retaliation from powerful (white) scholars. The writer who wrote without anonymity has received surprising, potent and discomfiting blowback from peers. Think about the current writer’s rationale for wanting to be anonymous: a palpable fear of retaliation . . . It is 2021 (when this essay was written); yet even an accomplished Black author still lives in fear of retaliation from people in positions of power in academia (and as the author notes, just writing about it, even anonymously, makes the heart beat faster). That . . . just . . . ain’t . . . right. We can and should do better – especially in a profession in which we are supposedly enlightened. This is the kind of essay that shows that our self-perceived and self-professed enlightenment is something of a (perhaps unwitting) fiction. This writer also does a convincing job of conveying just how fatiguing simply being Black in academia can be. Essays like the one the follows do not tell us things we don’t already know, but they do tell us that we have serious work to do to get where we ought to be. Do I expect this kind of essay to change the world? No, I don’t. Do I expect it to help keep the conversation going on a subject we desperately need to act upon? Yep, I do. It is one small step on the journey to a more enlightened humankind, not just for academics. For everybody. – Denny Gioia","PeriodicalId":47877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Inquiry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926211052212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the following essay, this author affirms in no uncertain terms that academia is (still) afflicted with entrenched racism and that the often-covert racism is systemic – i.e., built into the structures and processes of our institutions. It is also populated with ostensibly well-intended white scholars who negatively affect the careers of Black scholars in ways not necessarily apparent to most of us. Yet, we scholars are supposed to be the most enlightened of all professionals about such issues. This anonymous essay is a slap-in-the-face reminder that we are not. At least not from the point of view of the relatively few Black members of our profession– and their point of view is the one that matters most when it comes to this issue. I encourage you to listen up, even if the message is one you might not be comfortable hearing. Some of you might have noticed that the recent series of essays in the Provocations and Provocateurs section of JMI represents my attempt to give voice to different minorities in academia (international scholars, women scholars, Black scholars, and soon LGBTQ scholars). I hope it is not lost on readers of this section that two of the three writers have chosen to write anonymously. Anonymous #1, who wrote about the experiences of women in academia, chose to write without identifying herself to protect the guilty (to avoid offending people she otherwise admires for other reasons). Anonymous #2, a Black scholar, chose to write anonymously because s/he feared retaliation from powerful (white) scholars. The writer who wrote without anonymity has received surprising, potent and discomfiting blowback from peers. Think about the current writer’s rationale for wanting to be anonymous: a palpable fear of retaliation . . . It is 2021 (when this essay was written); yet even an accomplished Black author still lives in fear of retaliation from people in positions of power in academia (and as the author notes, just writing about it, even anonymously, makes the heart beat faster). That . . . just . . . ain’t . . . right. We can and should do better – especially in a profession in which we are supposedly enlightened. This is the kind of essay that shows that our self-perceived and self-professed enlightenment is something of a (perhaps unwitting) fiction. This writer also does a convincing job of conveying just how fatiguing simply being Black in academia can be. Essays like the one the follows do not tell us things we don’t already know, but they do tell us that we have serious work to do to get where we ought to be. Do I expect this kind of essay to change the world? No, I don’t. Do I expect it to help keep the conversation going on a subject we desperately need to act upon? Yep, I do. It is one small step on the journey to a more enlightened humankind, not just for academics. For everybody. – Denny Gioia
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被宠坏的苹果:致渴望“收养”黑人学者的白人学者的一封信
在接下来的文章中,作者毫不含糊地确认,学术界(仍然)受到根深蒂固的种族主义的困扰,而且往往隐蔽的种族主义是系统性的,即嵌入我们机构的结构和过程中。这里也挤满了表面上善意的白人学者,他们对黑人学者的职业生涯产生了负面影响,这种影响对我们大多数人来说并不明显。然而,我们学者应该是所有专业人士中对这些问题最开明的。这篇匿名文章是一记耳光,提醒我们并非如此。至少从我们职业中相对较少的黑人成员的角度来看不是这样——在这个问题上,他们的观点是最重要的。我鼓励你认真听,即使你可能听不舒服。你们中的一些人可能已经注意到,最近在JMI的挑衅者和挑衅者部分发表的一系列文章代表了我试图为学术界的不同少数群体(国际学者、女性学者、黑人学者,以及即将到来的LGBTQ学者)发声。我希望本节的读者不要忘记,三位作家中有两位选择了匿名写作。匿名者#1写的是女性在学术界的经历,她选择在不表明自己身份的情况下写作,以保护罪犯(避免因为其他原因冒犯她崇拜的人)。匿名者#2是一位黑人学者,他选择匿名写作是因为他/她害怕有权势的(白人)学者的报复。这位匿名写作的作家受到了同行们令人惊讶、强烈和不安的回击。想想这位现任作家想要匿名的理由:对报复的明显恐惧。现在是2021年(这篇文章写的时候);然而,即使是一位有成就的黑人作家,也仍然生活在对学术界当权者报复的恐惧中(正如作者所指出的,仅仅是匿名写这篇文章,就会让人心跳加速)。那个只是不是。正确的我们可以也应该做得更好——尤其是在一个我们被认为是开明的职业中。这类文章表明,我们自我感知和自称的启蒙是一种虚构的(也许是无意的)。这位作家还做了一项令人信服的工作,传达了在学术界仅仅是黑人是多么的疲惫。像下面这样的文章并没有告诉我们一些我们还不知道的事情,但它们确实告诉我们,我们还有认真的工作要做,才能达到我们应该达到的水平。我希望这种文章能改变世界吗?不,我没有。我希望它能帮助我们继续讨论一个我们迫切需要采取行动的话题吗?是的,我知道。这是迈向更开明的人类之旅的一小步,而不仅仅是学术界。为每个人Denny Gioia
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management Inquiry, sponsored by the Western Academy of Management, is a refereed journal for scholars and professionals in management, organizational behavior, strategy, and human resources. Its intent is to explore ideas and build knowledge in management theory and practice, with a focus on creative, nontraditional research as well as key controversies in the field. The journal seeks to maintain a constructive balance between innovation and quality, and at the same time widely define the forms that relevant contributions to the field can take. JMI features six sections: Meet the Person, Provocations, Reflections on Experience, Nontraditional Research, Essays, and Dialog.
期刊最新文献
Managing Social Impact Bonds: Intermediary Work and Designing Institutional Infrastructure Wake up! Advancing the Conversation on Woke Labeling Psychedelics, Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy and Employees’ Wellbeing A Revisionist History Approach to the Study of Emotional Labor: Have We Forgotten Display Rules and Service Contexts? Back to the Future: What We’d Change in “Social Identity Theory and the Organization” (Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14, 20–39)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1