Exploring a dialogic approach in tackling psychotic diseases: A systematic review

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY Anales De Psicologia Pub Date : 2022-08-27 DOI:10.6018/analesps.494351
Aitana Fernández-Villardón, Rocío García-Carrión, Sandra Racionero-Plaza
{"title":"Exploring a dialogic approach in tackling psychotic diseases: A systematic review","authors":"Aitana Fernández-Villardón, Rocío García-Carrión, Sandra Racionero-Plaza","doi":"10.6018/analesps.494351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychosis is a severe mental disorder traditionally treated from a purely biological approach, which often has led to a dehumanisation in psychiatric hospitals. To counteract this trend and aiming at tackling the disease with a more human approach, psychosocial interventions have increased. In this vein, interventions based on a dialogic approach, with specific features such as egalitarian dialogue, foster psychological and social transformations in different contexts. This review aims to analyse the clinical and social effects of psychological interventions based on these principles when treating patients with psychosis. A systematic review has been carried out, following PRISMA recommendations, in the Web of Science, Scopus and PsycInfo databases. After applying the inclusion criteria, thirteen empirical studies were selected and analysed, including a quality assessment. These studies show that when introducing a dialogic approach in treating psychosis, positive clinical and relational outcomes are obtained. Likewise, patients value positively these collaborative environments, where they feel listened and understood. Whereas dialogism emerges as a tool with potential benefits to tackle psychosis, more studies are needed to clearer determine the influence of specific dialogic features on improving psychotic patients’ mental health.\n La psicosis es un trastorno mental grave que tradicionalmente se ha tratado desde un enfoque puramente biológico, lo que a menudo ha conllevado una deshumanización en los hospitales psiquiátricos. Con el fin de contrarrestar esta tendencia y con el objetivo de abordar la enfermedad desde enfoque más humano, las intervenciones psicosociales han aumentado. En esta línea, las intervenciones basadas en un enfoque dialógico, con características específicas como el diálogo igualitario, fomentan transformaciones psicológicas y sociales en diferentes contextos. Esta revisión pretende analizar el impacto clínico y social de las intervenciones psicológicas basadas en principios dialógicos en pacientes con psicosis. Se ha realizado una revisión sistemática, siguiendo las recomendaciones PRISMA, en las bases de datos Web of Science, Scopus y PsycInfo. Tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión, se seleccionaron y analizaron trece estudios empíricos, además, se ha incluido una evaluación de la calidad de dichos estudios. Estos estudios muestran que, al incorporar un enfoque dialógico en el tratamiento de la psicosis, se obtienen resultados clínicos y relacionales positivos. De la misma manera, los pacientes valoran positivamente estos entornos de colaboración, donde se sienten escuchados y comprendidos. Aunque el dialogismo emerge como una herramienta eficaz para abordar la psicosis, se necesitan más estudios para determinar con mayor claridad la influencia de características dialógicas específicas en la salud mental de los pacientes.","PeriodicalId":55521,"journal":{"name":"Anales De Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales De Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.494351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Psychosis is a severe mental disorder traditionally treated from a purely biological approach, which often has led to a dehumanisation in psychiatric hospitals. To counteract this trend and aiming at tackling the disease with a more human approach, psychosocial interventions have increased. In this vein, interventions based on a dialogic approach, with specific features such as egalitarian dialogue, foster psychological and social transformations in different contexts. This review aims to analyse the clinical and social effects of psychological interventions based on these principles when treating patients with psychosis. A systematic review has been carried out, following PRISMA recommendations, in the Web of Science, Scopus and PsycInfo databases. After applying the inclusion criteria, thirteen empirical studies were selected and analysed, including a quality assessment. These studies show that when introducing a dialogic approach in treating psychosis, positive clinical and relational outcomes are obtained. Likewise, patients value positively these collaborative environments, where they feel listened and understood. Whereas dialogism emerges as a tool with potential benefits to tackle psychosis, more studies are needed to clearer determine the influence of specific dialogic features on improving psychotic patients’ mental health. La psicosis es un trastorno mental grave que tradicionalmente se ha tratado desde un enfoque puramente biológico, lo que a menudo ha conllevado una deshumanización en los hospitales psiquiátricos. Con el fin de contrarrestar esta tendencia y con el objetivo de abordar la enfermedad desde enfoque más humano, las intervenciones psicosociales han aumentado. En esta línea, las intervenciones basadas en un enfoque dialógico, con características específicas como el diálogo igualitario, fomentan transformaciones psicológicas y sociales en diferentes contextos. Esta revisión pretende analizar el impacto clínico y social de las intervenciones psicológicas basadas en principios dialógicos en pacientes con psicosis. Se ha realizado una revisión sistemática, siguiendo las recomendaciones PRISMA, en las bases de datos Web of Science, Scopus y PsycInfo. Tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión, se seleccionaron y analizaron trece estudios empíricos, además, se ha incluido una evaluación de la calidad de dichos estudios. Estos estudios muestran que, al incorporar un enfoque dialógico en el tratamiento de la psicosis, se obtienen resultados clínicos y relacionales positivos. De la misma manera, los pacientes valoran positivamente estos entornos de colaboración, donde se sienten escuchados y comprendidos. Aunque el dialogismo emerge como una herramienta eficaz para abordar la psicosis, se necesitan más estudios para determinar con mayor claridad la influencia de características dialógicas específicas en la salud mental de los pacientes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索精神疾病的对话方法:系统回顾
精神病是一种严重的精神障碍,传统上仅用生物学方法治疗,往往导致精神病院的去人性化。为了应对这一趋势,并旨在以更人性化的方式应对疾病,心理社会干预有所增加。在这方面,基于对话方法的干预,具有平等对话、促进不同背景下的心理和社会转型等具体特征。这篇综述的目的是分析基于这些原则的心理干预在治疗精神病患者时的临床和社会影响。根据Prisma的建议,在科学、Scopus和Psycinfo数据库网站上进行了系统审查。在应用纳入标准后,选择并分析了13项实证研究,包括质量评估。这些研究表明,当在治疗精神病中引入对话方法时,可以获得积极的临床和关系结果。同样,患者积极重视这些合作环境,在这些环境中,他们感到被倾听和理解。虽然区域对话主义作为一种可能有助于治疗精神病的工具出现,但需要进行更多的研究,以澄清具体对话特征对改善精神病患者心理健康的影响。精神病是一种严重的精神障碍,传统上是从纯粹的生物学方法来治疗的,这往往导致精神病院的非人化。为了应对这一趋势,并以更人性化的方式应对这一疾病,心理社会干预措施有所增加。在这方面,基于对话方法的干预措施,具有平等对话等具体特征,促进了不同背景下的心理和社会转型。本文旨在分析基于对话原则的心理干预对精神病患者的临床和社会影响。根据Prisma的建议,对科学网站、Scopus和Psycinfo数据库进行了系统审查。在应用纳入标准后,选择并分析了13项实证研究,并对这些研究的质量进行了评估。这些研究表明,通过将对话方法纳入精神病的治疗,可以获得积极的临床和关系结果。同样,患者积极评价这些合作环境,在这些环境中,他们感到被倾听和理解。虽然对话是解决精神病的有效工具,但需要进行更多的研究,以更清楚地确定特定对话特征对患者心理健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anales De Psicologia
Anales De Psicologia 医学-心理学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
57
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Anales de Psicologia / Annals of Psychology is a multidisciplinary journal of the various thematic areas of scientific psychology. It publishes original research articles and theoretical review in any of its basic, applied and methodological areas included within psychology. Publishing, financing, marketing and distribution corresponds Editum: Editions of the University of Murcia (Spain). The organizational guidelines and editorial policies come from the Editorial Team (elected for four years by the Areas and / or Departments of Psychology at the University of Murcia) and the Editorial Board, composed of scholars and experts from different universities and institutions national and international. It is published in print (ISSN: 0212-9728) since 1984 and in Internet publishing (web) (ISSN: 1695-2294) since 2000. Available online full text in pdf from the vol. 1 1984. Anales de Psicologia / Annals of Psychology maintains a system of exchange with other journals and publications of psychology in the world. Through an free exchange agreement with their respective publishers or entities responsible for editing, these journals and publications are received at the University of Murcia (Biblioteca "Luis Vives", near the Faculty of Psychology) and in return, our journal is sent to libraries and educational and research institutions such centers responsible for editing.
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study on emotional labor and work-family conflict in caregivers working in nursing homes Psychosocial risks factors and burnout in police officers: a network analysis Substance use and mental health of Brazilian truck drivers Sexting is not always wanted: consequences on satisfaction and the role of sexual coercion and online sexual victimization Spanish version of the Metacognition Self-Assessment Scale (MSAS) for adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1