The complexity of post-mergers and acquisitions reorganization: Integration and differentiation

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Global Strategy Journal Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1002/gsj.1454
Kim E. van Oorschot, Bella B. Nujen, Hans Solli-Sæther, Deodat Edward Mwesiumo
{"title":"The complexity of post-mergers and acquisitions reorganization: Integration and differentiation","authors":"Kim E. van Oorschot,&nbsp;Bella B. Nujen,&nbsp;Hans Solli-Sæther,&nbsp;Deodat Edward Mwesiumo","doi":"10.1002/gsj.1454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This article applies a mixed-method approach to explore the complexities of post-mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A) integration processes. Extant literature provides significant insights regarding the impact of task and human integration and their influence on post-integration processes. However, the literature often fails to differentiate between subelements of these two dimensions. This article investigates task and human integration in a cross-border M&amp;A aimed at efficiency and innovativeness. We highlight the importance of a clear distinction between two subelements of task integration (product harmonization and structural integration) and show that different interorganizational contexts matter. Consequently, we propose a conceptual framework based on two contextual characteristics—source of synergy and choice of location—suggesting that different integration approaches should be applied simultaneously in different contexts of the same post-M&amp;A organization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Managerial Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Due to the complexity of the post-M&amp;A integration process, organizing and managing such a process is a challenge to most practitioners. Understanding how to manage different integration dimensions increases the need for prioritization in order to bypass a one-size-fits-all initiative. We suggest that managers should apply a differentiated postintegration approach, depending on specific organizational contexts. A product-focused approach seems to fit best in a context where target and acquirer remain working in separate locations, but on similar products. A structure-focused approach is recommended when target and acquirer remain separated, but work on complementary products. Finally, a people-focused approach is proposed when target and acquirer are colocated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47563,"journal":{"name":"Global Strategy Journal","volume":"13 3","pages":"673-699"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gsj.1454","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Strategy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gsj.1454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Research Summary

This article applies a mixed-method approach to explore the complexities of post-mergers and acquisitions (M&A) integration processes. Extant literature provides significant insights regarding the impact of task and human integration and their influence on post-integration processes. However, the literature often fails to differentiate between subelements of these two dimensions. This article investigates task and human integration in a cross-border M&A aimed at efficiency and innovativeness. We highlight the importance of a clear distinction between two subelements of task integration (product harmonization and structural integration) and show that different interorganizational contexts matter. Consequently, we propose a conceptual framework based on two contextual characteristics—source of synergy and choice of location—suggesting that different integration approaches should be applied simultaneously in different contexts of the same post-M&A organization.

Managerial Summary

Due to the complexity of the post-M&A integration process, organizing and managing such a process is a challenge to most practitioners. Understanding how to manage different integration dimensions increases the need for prioritization in order to bypass a one-size-fits-all initiative. We suggest that managers should apply a differentiated postintegration approach, depending on specific organizational contexts. A product-focused approach seems to fit best in a context where target and acquirer remain working in separate locations, but on similar products. A structure-focused approach is recommended when target and acquirer remain separated, but work on complementary products. Finally, a people-focused approach is proposed when target and acquirer are colocated.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并购后重组的复杂性:整合与差异化
本文采用混合方法来探讨并购后(M& a)整合过程的复杂性。现存文献对任务和人类整合的影响及其对整合后过程的影响提供了重要的见解。然而,文献往往不能区分这两个维度的子元素。本文研究了以效率和创新为目标的跨国并购中的任务和人的整合。我们强调了明确区分任务集成的两个子元素(产品协调和结构集成)的重要性,并表明不同的组织间环境很重要。因此,我们提出了一个基于两个语境特征(协同来源和位置选择)的概念框架,表明不同的整合方法应该同时应用于同一并购后组织的不同语境。由于后管理整合过程的复杂性,组织和管理这样一个过程对大多数实践者来说是一个挑战。了解如何管理不同的集成维度增加了对优先级的需求,以便绕过一刀切的计划。我们建议管理者应根据具体的组织环境,采用差异化的整合后方法。以产品为中心的方法似乎最适合目标和收购者在不同的地方工作,但在类似的产品上。当目标公司和收购公司保持分离,但在互补产品上工作时,建议采用以结构为重点的方法。最后,提出了以人为本的并购策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Global Strategy Journal is a premier platform dedicated to publishing highly influential managerially-oriented global strategy research worldwide. Covering themes such as international and global strategy, assembling the global enterprise, and strategic management, GSJ plays a vital role in advancing our understanding of global business dynamics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC A perspective on three trade-offs of blockchain technology for the global strategy of the MNC Issue Information - TOC Inward FDI and local firms' political connections in emerging markets: Evidence from China Issue Information - TOC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1