Implementing Just Culture to Improve Patient Safety.

John S Murray, Joan Clifford, Stacey Larson, Jonathan K Lee, Gary L Sculli
{"title":"Implementing Just Culture to Improve Patient Safety.","authors":"John S Murray, Joan Clifford, Stacey Larson, Jonathan K Lee, Gary L Sculli","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usac115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number of deaths in the United States related to medical errors remains unacceptably high. Further complicating this situation is the problem of underreporting due to the fear of the consequences. In fact, the most commonly reported cause of underreporting worldwide is the fear of the negative consequences associated with reporting. As health care organizations along the journey to high-reliability strive to improve patient safety, a concerted effort needs to be focused on changing how medical errors are addressed. A paradigm shift is needed from immediately assigning blame and punishing individuals to one that is trusting and just. Staff must trust that when errors occur, organizations will respond in a manner that is fair and appropriate.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An extensive review of the literature from 2017 until January 2022 was conducted for the most current evidence describing the principles and practices of \"just culture\" in health care organizations. Additionally, recommendations were sought on how health care organizations can go about implementing \"just culture\" principles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty sources of evidence on \"just culture' were retrieved and reviewed. The evidence was used to describe the concept and principles of \"just culture\" in health care organizations. Furthermore, five strategies for implementing \"just culture\" principles were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improving patient safety requires that high-reliability organizations strive to ensure that the culture of the organization is trusting and just. In a trusting and just culture, adverse events are recognized as valuable opportunities to understand contributing factors and learn rather than immediately assign blame. Moving away from a blame culture is a paradigm shift for many health care organizations yet critically important for improving patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usac115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The number of deaths in the United States related to medical errors remains unacceptably high. Further complicating this situation is the problem of underreporting due to the fear of the consequences. In fact, the most commonly reported cause of underreporting worldwide is the fear of the negative consequences associated with reporting. As health care organizations along the journey to high-reliability strive to improve patient safety, a concerted effort needs to be focused on changing how medical errors are addressed. A paradigm shift is needed from immediately assigning blame and punishing individuals to one that is trusting and just. Staff must trust that when errors occur, organizations will respond in a manner that is fair and appropriate.

Materials and methods: An extensive review of the literature from 2017 until January 2022 was conducted for the most current evidence describing the principles and practices of "just culture" in health care organizations. Additionally, recommendations were sought on how health care organizations can go about implementing "just culture" principles.

Results: Twenty sources of evidence on "just culture' were retrieved and reviewed. The evidence was used to describe the concept and principles of "just culture" in health care organizations. Furthermore, five strategies for implementing "just culture" principles were identified.

Conclusions: Improving patient safety requires that high-reliability organizations strive to ensure that the culture of the organization is trusting and just. In a trusting and just culture, adverse events are recognized as valuable opportunities to understand contributing factors and learn rather than immediately assign blame. Moving away from a blame culture is a paradigm shift for many health care organizations yet critically important for improving patient safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施公正文化提高患者安全。
在美国,与医疗事故相关的死亡人数仍然高得令人无法接受。由于担心后果而少报的问题使情况进一步复杂化。事实上,世界范围内报告少报的最常见原因是害怕与报告相关的负面后果。随着医疗保健组织在实现高可靠性的过程中努力提高患者安全性,需要共同努力,改变医疗错误的处理方式。我们需要一种模式的转变,从立即指责和惩罚个人到信任和公正。员工必须相信,当错误发生时,组织将以公平和适当的方式作出反应。材料和方法对2017年至2022年1月的文献进行了广泛的回顾,以获取描述医疗保健组织中“公正文化”原则和实践的最新证据。此外,还就卫生保健组织如何着手实施"公正文化"原则征求了建议。结果对“公正培养”的20个证据来源进行了检索和审查。这些证据被用来描述卫生保健组织中“公正文化”的概念和原则。此外,还确定了执行“公正文化”原则的五项战略。结论提高患者安全需要高可靠性组织努力确保组织文化是信任和公正的。在信任和公正的文化中,不良事件被认为是了解促成因素和学习的宝贵机会,而不是立即推卸责任。对许多医疗保健组织来说,摆脱指责文化是一种范式转变,但对提高患者安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Race Differences in Veteran's Affairs Emergency Department Utilization. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury-Lifetime Clinical Interview Compared to Department of Defense Medical Records. Symptoms and Central Sensory Integration in People With Chronic mTBI: Clinical Implications. Correlates of Dietary Behaviors Among Young Emirati Males Completing Compulsory Military Service. Physiological Demands and Characteristics of Movement During Simulated Combat.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1