EXPRESS: ‘What may be’: Inspiration from Mary Parker Follett for Paradox Theory

IF 5.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Strategic Organization Pub Date : 2023-01-09 DOI:10.1177/14761270231151734
R. Bednarek, Wendy K. Smith
{"title":"EXPRESS: ‘What may be’: Inspiration from Mary Parker Follett for Paradox Theory","authors":"R. Bednarek, Wendy K. Smith","doi":"10.1177/14761270231151734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars increasingly turn to paradox theory to offer insight into our world’s greatest challenges. Yet to contribute to radical strategy theorizing concerning those challenges and avoid premature convergence on a narrow set of ideas, paradox scholars need new insights. We turn to early 20th century scholar and activist Mary Parker Follett. We highlight the alignment between Follett’s philosophy and contemporary paradox theory, showing that the two approaches are well-suited traveling companions. Drawing on these similarities, we then explore how Follett’s novel insights emphasize ‘what is’ rather than ‘what may be’ and in doing so challenge and expand on paradox theory. Specifically, these ideas help paradox theory reimagining of organizations and strategizing by focusing on 1) how the micro constructs the macro; 2) possibilities for meaningful change; and 3) participatory interactions. By doing so, we argue that Follet pushes paradox scholars to contribute to more radical strategy theorizing.","PeriodicalId":22087,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Organization","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270231151734","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars increasingly turn to paradox theory to offer insight into our world’s greatest challenges. Yet to contribute to radical strategy theorizing concerning those challenges and avoid premature convergence on a narrow set of ideas, paradox scholars need new insights. We turn to early 20th century scholar and activist Mary Parker Follett. We highlight the alignment between Follett’s philosophy and contemporary paradox theory, showing that the two approaches are well-suited traveling companions. Drawing on these similarities, we then explore how Follett’s novel insights emphasize ‘what is’ rather than ‘what may be’ and in doing so challenge and expand on paradox theory. Specifically, these ideas help paradox theory reimagining of organizations and strategizing by focusing on 1) how the micro constructs the macro; 2) possibilities for meaningful change; and 3) participatory interactions. By doing so, we argue that Follet pushes paradox scholars to contribute to more radical strategy theorizing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS:“可能是什么”:玛丽·帕克·福莱特对悖论理论的启示
学者们越来越多地转向悖论理论,为我们这个世界面临的最大挑战提供见解。然而,为了对这些挑战的激进策略理论化做出贡献,并避免过早地趋同于一组狭隘的观点,悖论学者需要新的见解。我们转向20世纪早期的学者和活动家玛丽·帕克·福莱特。我们强调福莱特的哲学与当代悖论理论之间的一致性,表明这两种方法是非常适合的旅伴。利用这些相似之处,我们接着探讨了福莱特的新见解是如何强调“是什么”而不是“可能是什么”的,并在这样做的过程中挑战和扩展了悖论理论。具体来说,这些观点通过关注1)微观如何构建宏观来帮助悖论理论重新构想组织和制定战略;2)有意义变革的可能性;3)参与式互动。通过这样做,我们认为Follet推动悖论学者为更激进的策略理论化做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.20%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Strategic Organization is devoted to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed, discipline-grounded conceptual and empirical research of interest to researchers, teachers, students, and practitioners of strategic management and organization. The journal also aims to be of considerable interest to senior managers in government, industry, and particularly the growing management consulting industry. Strategic Organization provides an international, interdisciplinary forum designed to improve our understanding of the interrelated dynamics of strategic and organizational processes and outcomes.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Researchers convening dialogue to address grand challenges: Affordances, tensions, and the shift to deep dialogue EXPRESS: From Seller to Broker: When and How Issue Sellers Engage with External Stakeholders to Sell Issues Inside Organizations EXPRESS: The increasing value of status in low-performing organizations: Evidence from the video game industry EXPRESS: From loss to recovery: Spin-outs and parents’ innovation Themed issue: Changing business, how we work, and how we think
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1