Comparison of microfluidic and swim-up sperm separation methods for IVF

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Medical Journal of Cell Biology Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.2478/acb-2020-0022
M. Ješeta, K. Franzová, J. Žáková, P. Ventruba, I. Crha
{"title":"Comparison of microfluidic and swim-up sperm separation methods for IVF","authors":"M. Ješeta, K. Franzová, J. Žáková, P. Ventruba, I. Crha","doi":"10.2478/acb-2020-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Sperm separation for ICSI is an essential step in realization of the IVF procedures. The method of microfluidic separation of sperm cells using chips has been applied more and more frequently in recent years. This method is often presented as extremely gentle to spermatozoa and decreasing significantly concentration of sperm cells with fragmented DNA when compared to conventional methods. The aim of our study was to verify a microfluidic chip system from the perspective of its potential to select spermatozoa with non-fragmented DNA. We tested the efficiency of this separation method against the swim-up method. In this study we evaluated sperm DNA integrity before and after the separation methods in ten patients. Ejaculate of each patient was separated by both the swim up method and the microfluidic chip method at the same time. It was shown that both the methods are very similar in reduction of spermatozoa with fragmented DNA. Interestingly, the concentration of spermatozoa with fragmented DNA was lower after the microfluidic separation than after the swim-up method in all the patients. Nevertheless, the differences were not statistically significant with only 2.1% on average, which is negligible in terms of practical use. Running title: Microfluidic chip and DNA fragmentation","PeriodicalId":18329,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Cell Biology","volume":"8 1","pages":"170 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/acb-2020-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Sperm separation for ICSI is an essential step in realization of the IVF procedures. The method of microfluidic separation of sperm cells using chips has been applied more and more frequently in recent years. This method is often presented as extremely gentle to spermatozoa and decreasing significantly concentration of sperm cells with fragmented DNA when compared to conventional methods. The aim of our study was to verify a microfluidic chip system from the perspective of its potential to select spermatozoa with non-fragmented DNA. We tested the efficiency of this separation method against the swim-up method. In this study we evaluated sperm DNA integrity before and after the separation methods in ten patients. Ejaculate of each patient was separated by both the swim up method and the microfluidic chip method at the same time. It was shown that both the methods are very similar in reduction of spermatozoa with fragmented DNA. Interestingly, the concentration of spermatozoa with fragmented DNA was lower after the microfluidic separation than after the swim-up method in all the patients. Nevertheless, the differences were not statistically significant with only 2.1% on average, which is negligible in terms of practical use. Running title: Microfluidic chip and DNA fragmentation
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外受精中微流体与游动精子分离方法的比较
精子分离用于ICSI是实现试管婴儿程序的重要步骤。近年来,利用芯片进行精子细胞微流体分离的方法得到了越来越多的应用。与传统方法相比,这种方法通常被认为对精子非常温和,并显著降低了DNA片段精子细胞的浓度。我们研究的目的是从微流控芯片系统选择具有非片段DNA的精子的潜力的角度来验证该系统。我们测试了这种分离方法与上升法的效率。在本研究中,我们评估了10名患者在分离方法前后精子DNA的完整性。同时采用向上游动法和微流控芯片法对每位患者的唾液进行分离。研究表明,这两种方法在减少DNA片段的精子方面非常相似。有趣的是,在所有患者中,微流体分离后DNA片段精子的浓度都低于向上游动法后。然而,这些差异在统计上并不显著,平均只有2.1%,就实际使用而言,这是可以忽略不计的。运行标题:微流控芯片和DNA片段
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Cell Biology
Medical Journal of Cell Biology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cell Biology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The negative effect on human health due to disruption of circadian rhythm in modern times Understanding endometriosis: a threat to fertility Glioblastoma: A molecular insight into current discoveries and treatment directions Neuromolecular analysis of post-traumatic stress disorder – the dysregulation in neuronal and signalling pathways Molecular and metabolic changes in neurological manifestations of Post-COVID conditions with special consideration of spectroscopy MR analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1