The “ASEAN WAY” Revisited For Strengthening Regional Environmental Governanance: A Macro Perspective

Yitian Huang
{"title":"The “ASEAN WAY” Revisited For Strengthening Regional Environmental Governanance: A Macro Perspective","authors":"Yitian Huang","doi":"10.22452/mjir.vol9no1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “ASEAN Way” has been applied to tackle regional environmental problems in Southeast Asia for decades. As the political economy in Asia Pacific has become more turbulent in the 2020s, the “ASEAN Way” faces more difficulties. This article attempts to explore how the “ASEAN Way” could play a larger role under new circumstances. After looking into the traditional concerns about international actors, it discusses the domestic constraints of the “ASEAN Way”, which include corruption, lack of environmental capacity and negligence. On this basis, it analyses traditional implications of the “ASEAN Way” for environmental governance. It suggests that being non-interfering in nature, the “ASEAN Way” has three technical features in the sense that it is in favour of strengthening and using institutional linkage, promoting standard harmonisation, and integrating environmental protection into a broad development agenda. Three new challenges at the macro level are identified and discussed: industrial relocation, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Sino-US tension. Then it analyses three directional policy options for augmenting the “ASEAN Way” in the face of old and new conditions: further involving environmental NGOs, incrementally engaging neighboring countries and international institutions, and adopting a market-oriented approach to transnational policy coordination. It concludes by discussing how these policy options could be gradually implemented by ASEAN and its external partners.","PeriodicalId":33531,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of International Relations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/mjir.vol9no1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The “ASEAN Way” has been applied to tackle regional environmental problems in Southeast Asia for decades. As the political economy in Asia Pacific has become more turbulent in the 2020s, the “ASEAN Way” faces more difficulties. This article attempts to explore how the “ASEAN Way” could play a larger role under new circumstances. After looking into the traditional concerns about international actors, it discusses the domestic constraints of the “ASEAN Way”, which include corruption, lack of environmental capacity and negligence. On this basis, it analyses traditional implications of the “ASEAN Way” for environmental governance. It suggests that being non-interfering in nature, the “ASEAN Way” has three technical features in the sense that it is in favour of strengthening and using institutional linkage, promoting standard harmonisation, and integrating environmental protection into a broad development agenda. Three new challenges at the macro level are identified and discussed: industrial relocation, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Sino-US tension. Then it analyses three directional policy options for augmenting the “ASEAN Way” in the face of old and new conditions: further involving environmental NGOs, incrementally engaging neighboring countries and international institutions, and adopting a market-oriented approach to transnational policy coordination. It concludes by discussing how these policy options could be gradually implemented by ASEAN and its external partners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从宏观角度看加强区域环境治理的“东盟之路”
几十年来,“东盟方式”一直被应用于解决东南亚地区的环境问题。随着亚太政治经济在20世纪20年代变得更加动荡,“东盟之路”面临着更多的困难。本文试图探讨“东盟之路”在新形势下如何发挥更大作用。在考察了传统上对国际行为体的关注后,讨论了“东盟之路”在国内的制约因素,包括腐败、缺乏环境能力和疏忽。在此基础上,分析了“东盟方式”对环境治理的传统启示。它表明,“东盟方式”本质上是不干涉的,它有三个技术特征,即有利于加强和利用体制联系,促进标准协调,并将环境保护纳入广泛的发展议程。确定并讨论了宏观层面的三个新挑战:工业转移、新冠肺炎大流行和中美紧张局势。然后分析了在新旧形势下加强“东盟之路”的三个方向性政策选择:进一步让环境非政府组织参与进来,逐步让邻国和国际机构参与进来,以及采取以市场为导向的跨国政策协调方式。报告最后讨论了东盟及其外部伙伴如何逐步实施这些政策选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond Religious Fundamentalism: Multidimensional Poverty and Boko Haram’s Appeal Among Northern Nigerian Youths Secularism and Rise of Sunni Islam in Turkey: The Otherisation of the Alevis Securitisation of the Refugee Issue in Germany: The Far Right Challenge to Government Policies A Race to the Frontier: Invoking Peripheral Territories - Case of Sabah as a Regional Player China and Europe in Africa: Competition or Cooperation?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1