A two-step machine learning method for casualty prediction under emergencies

IF 3.7 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 安全科学与韧性(英文) Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.03.001
Xiaofeng Hu, Jinming Hu, Miaomiao Hou
{"title":"A two-step machine learning method for casualty prediction under emergencies","authors":"Xiaofeng Hu,&nbsp;Jinming Hu,&nbsp;Miaomiao Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Casualty prediction is meaningful to the emergency management of natural hazards and human-induced disasters. In this study, a two-step machine learning method, including classification step and regression step, is proposed to predict the number of casualties under emergencies. In the classification step, whether there are casualties under an incident is firstly predicted, then in the regression step, samples predicted to have casualties are used to further predict the exact number of the casualties. Using an open-source dataset, this two-step method is validated. The results show that the two-step model performs better than the original regression models. Back propagation(BP) neural network combined with Random Forest performs the best in terms of the death toll and the number of injuries. Among all the two-step models, the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) for the death toll is 1.67 while that for the number of injuries is 4.13, which indicates that this method can accurately predict the number of casualties under emergencies. This study's results are expected to provide support for decision-making on rapid resource allocation and other emergency responses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 243-251"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449622000160/pdfft?md5=86b72d896c4210c4e8af58620d26dfcd&pid=1-s2.0-S2666449622000160-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449622000160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Casualty prediction is meaningful to the emergency management of natural hazards and human-induced disasters. In this study, a two-step machine learning method, including classification step and regression step, is proposed to predict the number of casualties under emergencies. In the classification step, whether there are casualties under an incident is firstly predicted, then in the regression step, samples predicted to have casualties are used to further predict the exact number of the casualties. Using an open-source dataset, this two-step method is validated. The results show that the two-step model performs better than the original regression models. Back propagation(BP) neural network combined with Random Forest performs the best in terms of the death toll and the number of injuries. Among all the two-step models, the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) for the death toll is 1.67 while that for the number of injuries is 4.13, which indicates that this method can accurately predict the number of casualties under emergencies. This study's results are expected to provide support for decision-making on rapid resource allocation and other emergency responses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紧急情况下人员伤亡预测的两步机器学习方法
伤亡预测对自然灾害和人为灾害的应急管理具有重要意义。本研究提出了一种包括分类步骤和回归步骤的两步机器学习方法来预测突发事件下的伤亡人数。在分类步骤中,首先预测事件下是否有人员伤亡,然后在回归步骤中,使用预测有人员伤亡的样本进一步预测准确的人员伤亡人数。使用一个开源数据集,验证了这种两步方法。结果表明,两步回归模型的性能优于原有的回归模型。结合随机森林的BP神经网络在死亡人数和受伤人数方面表现最好。在所有两步模型中,死亡人数的平均绝对误差(MAE)最低为1.67,受伤人数的平均绝对误差(MAE)最低为4.13,表明该方法可以准确预测突发事件下的伤亡人数。预计这项研究的结果将为快速资源分配和其他应急反应的决策提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
期刊最新文献
Grasping emergency dynamics: A review of group evacuation techniques and strategies in major emergencies Multi-factor coupled forest fire model based on cellular automata Scenario construction and vulnerability assessment of natural hazards-triggered power grid accidents Risk assessment of fire casualty in underground commercial building based on FFTA-BN model Determination of individual disaster resilience levels of hospital staff: A case study of Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1