Performance Analysis of Static Precise Point Positioning Using Open-Source GAMP

IF 0.7 Q4 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Artificial Satellites-Journal of Planetary Geodesy Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.2478/arsa-2020-0004
Jabir Shabbir Malik
{"title":"Performance Analysis of Static Precise Point Positioning Using Open-Source GAMP","authors":"Jabir Shabbir Malik","doi":"10.2478/arsa-2020-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In addition to Global Positioning System (GPS) constellation, the number of Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS) satellites is increasing; it is now possible to evaluate and analyze the position accuracy with both the GPS and GLONASS constellation. In this article, statistical analysis of static precise point positioning (PPP) using GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS/GLONASS modes is evaluated. Observational data of 10 whole days from 10 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations are used for analysis. Position accuracy in east, north, up components, and carrier phase/code residuals is analyzed. Multi-GNSS PPP open-source package is used for the PPP performance analysis. The analysis also provides the GNSS researchers the understanding of the observational data processing algorithm. Calculation statistics reveal that standard deviation (STD) of horizontal component is 3.83, 13.80, and 3.33 cm for GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS/GLONASS PPP solutions, respectively. Combined GPS/GLONASS PPP achieves better positioning accuracy in horizontal and three-dimensional (3D) accuracy compared with GPS-only and GLONASS-only PPP solutions. The results of the calculation show that combined GPS/GLONASS PPP improves, on an average, horizontal accuracy by 12.11% and 60.33% and 3D positioning accuracy by 10.39% and 66.78% compared with GPS-only and GLONASS-only solutions, respectively. In addition, the results also demonstrate that GPS-only solutions show an improvement of 54.23% and 62.54% compared with GLONASS-only PPP mode in horizontal and 3D components, respectively. Moreover, residuals of GLONASS ionosphere-free code observations are larger than the GPS code residuals. However, phase residuals of GPS and GLONASS phase observations are of the same magnitude.","PeriodicalId":43216,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Satellites-Journal of Planetary Geodesy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Satellites-Journal of Planetary Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/arsa-2020-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract In addition to Global Positioning System (GPS) constellation, the number of Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS) satellites is increasing; it is now possible to evaluate and analyze the position accuracy with both the GPS and GLONASS constellation. In this article, statistical analysis of static precise point positioning (PPP) using GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS/GLONASS modes is evaluated. Observational data of 10 whole days from 10 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations are used for analysis. Position accuracy in east, north, up components, and carrier phase/code residuals is analyzed. Multi-GNSS PPP open-source package is used for the PPP performance analysis. The analysis also provides the GNSS researchers the understanding of the observational data processing algorithm. Calculation statistics reveal that standard deviation (STD) of horizontal component is 3.83, 13.80, and 3.33 cm for GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS/GLONASS PPP solutions, respectively. Combined GPS/GLONASS PPP achieves better positioning accuracy in horizontal and three-dimensional (3D) accuracy compared with GPS-only and GLONASS-only PPP solutions. The results of the calculation show that combined GPS/GLONASS PPP improves, on an average, horizontal accuracy by 12.11% and 60.33% and 3D positioning accuracy by 10.39% and 66.78% compared with GPS-only and GLONASS-only solutions, respectively. In addition, the results also demonstrate that GPS-only solutions show an improvement of 54.23% and 62.54% compared with GLONASS-only PPP mode in horizontal and 3D components, respectively. Moreover, residuals of GLONASS ionosphere-free code observations are larger than the GPS code residuals. However, phase residuals of GPS and GLONASS phase observations are of the same magnitude.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于开源GAMP的静态精确点定位性能分析
摘要除了全球定位系统(GPS)星座外,全球导航卫星系统(GLONASS)卫星的数量也在增加;现在可以利用GPS和GLONASS星座来评估和分析位置精度。本文对仅使用GPS、仅使用GLONASS和GPS/GLONASS组合模式的静态精确点定位(PPP)进行了统计分析。使用10个国际全球导航卫星系统服务站的10整天观测数据进行分析。分析了东分量、北分量、上分量和载波相位/码残差的位置精度。多GNSS PPP开源软件包用于PPP性能分析。该分析还为全球导航卫星系统研究人员提供了对观测数据处理算法的理解。计算统计表明,仅GPS、仅GLONASS和GPS/GLONASS PPP组合解决方案的水平分量标准偏差(STD)分别为3.83、13.80和3.33cm。与仅GPS和仅GLONASS PPP解决方案相比,GPS/GLONASS PPP组合方案在水平和三维(3D)精度方面实现了更好的定位精度。计算结果表明,与仅使用GPS和仅使用GLONASS的解决方案相比,GPS/GLONASS组合PPP平均水平精度分别提高12.11%和60.33%,3D定位精度分别提高10.39%和66.78%。此外,结果还表明,与仅GLONASS的PPP模式相比,仅GPS的解决方案在水平和三维分量上分别提高了54.23%和62.54%。此外,GLONASS无电离层码观测的残差大于GPS码的残差。然而,GPS和GLONASS相位观测的相位残差大小相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Similarities and Differences in the Earth’s Water Variations Signal Provided by Grace and AMSR-E Observations Using Maximum Covariance Analysis at Various Land Cover Data Backgrounds Medium- and Long-Term Prediction of Polar Motion Using Weighted Least Squares Extrapolation and Vector Autoregressive Modeling Study on Secular Change of the Earth’s Rotation Rate Based on Solar Eclipse Observation Records on October 13, 443 BC Interstellar Probe: Science, Engineering, Logistic, Economic, and Social Factors Geodynamic Studies in the Pieniny Klippen Belt in 2004–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1