Comparison of Some Prediction Models and their Relevance in the Clinical Research

N. Panda, K. L. Mahanta, Jitendra Kumar Pati, P. Varanasi, Ruchi Bhuyan
{"title":"Comparison of Some Prediction Models and their Relevance in the Clinical Research","authors":"N. Panda, K. L. Mahanta, Jitendra Kumar Pati, P. Varanasi, Ruchi Bhuyan","doi":"10.6000/1929-6029.2023.12.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In healthcare research, predictive modeling is commonly utilized to forecast risk variables and enhance treatment procedures for improved patient outcomes. Enormous quantities of data are being created as a result of recent advances in research, clinical trials, next-generation genomic sequencing, biomarkers, and transcriptional and translational studies. Understanding how to handle and comprehend scientific data to offer better treatment for patients is critical. Currently, multiple prediction models are being utilized to investigate patient outcomes. However, it is critical to recognize the limitations of these models in the research design and their unique benefits and drawbacks. In this overview, we will look at linear regression, logistic regression, decision trees, and artificial neural network prediction models, as well as their advantages and disadvantages. The two most perilous requirements for building any predictive healthcare model are feature selection and model validation. Typically, feature selection is done by a review of the literature and expert opinion on that subject. Model validation is also an essential component of every prediction model. It characteristically relates to the predictive model's performance and accuracy. It is strongly recommended that all clinical parameters should be thoroughly examined before using any prediction model.","PeriodicalId":73480,"journal":{"name":"International journal of statistics in medical research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of statistics in medical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2023.12.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In healthcare research, predictive modeling is commonly utilized to forecast risk variables and enhance treatment procedures for improved patient outcomes. Enormous quantities of data are being created as a result of recent advances in research, clinical trials, next-generation genomic sequencing, biomarkers, and transcriptional and translational studies. Understanding how to handle and comprehend scientific data to offer better treatment for patients is critical. Currently, multiple prediction models are being utilized to investigate patient outcomes. However, it is critical to recognize the limitations of these models in the research design and their unique benefits and drawbacks. In this overview, we will look at linear regression, logistic regression, decision trees, and artificial neural network prediction models, as well as their advantages and disadvantages. The two most perilous requirements for building any predictive healthcare model are feature selection and model validation. Typically, feature selection is done by a review of the literature and expert opinion on that subject. Model validation is also an essential component of every prediction model. It characteristically relates to the predictive model's performance and accuracy. It is strongly recommended that all clinical parameters should be thoroughly examined before using any prediction model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
几种预测模型的比较及其在临床研究中的应用
在医疗保健研究中,预测模型通常用于预测风险变量,并加强治疗程序,以改善患者的预后。由于研究、临床试验、下一代基因组测序、生物标志物以及转录和翻译研究的最新进展,正在创造大量数据。了解如何处理和理解科学数据,为患者提供更好的治疗至关重要。目前,多种预测模型正被用于研究患者的预后。然而,在研究设计中认识到这些模型的局限性及其独特的优点和缺点是至关重要的。在这篇综述中,我们将研究线性回归、逻辑回归、决策树和人工神经网络预测模型,以及它们的优缺点。构建任何预测性医疗保健模型的两个最危险的要求是特征选择和模型验证。通常,特征选择是通过对该主题的文献和专家意见进行审查来完成的。模型验证也是每个预测模型的重要组成部分。它的特点与预测模型的性能和准确性有关。强烈建议在使用任何预测模型之前,应彻底检查所有临床参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Support of Characteristics, Physical Environmental and Psychological On Quality Of Life Of Patients With DM Type II Competing Risks Model to Evaluate Dropout Dynamics Among the Type 1 Diabetes Patients Registered with the Changing Diabetes in Children (CDiC) Program The Impact of the Risk Perception of COVID-19 PANDEMIC on College Students' Occupational Anxiety: The Moderating Effect of Career Adaptability Adaptive Elastic Net on High-Dimensional Sparse Data with Multicollinearity: Application to Lipomatous Tumor Classification Triglyceridemic Waist Phenotypes as Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1