IDCRP Combat-Related Extremity Wound Infection Research.

Joseph L. Petfield, Louis R. Lewandowski, L. Stewart, C. Murray, D. Tribble
{"title":"IDCRP Combat-Related Extremity Wound Infection Research.","authors":"Joseph L. Petfield, Louis R. Lewandowski, L. Stewart, C. Murray, D. Tribble","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usab065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nExtremity trauma is the most common battlefield injury, resulting in a high frequency of combat-related extremity wound infections (CEWIs). As these infections are associated with substantial morbidity and may impact wounded warriors long after initial hospitalization, CEWIs have been a focus of the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program (IDCRP). Herein, we review findings of CEWI research conducted through the IDCRP and discuss future and ongoing analyses.\n\n\nMETHODS\nMilitary personnel with deployment-related trauma sustained between 2009 and 2014 were examined in retrospective analyses through the observational Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study (TIDOS). Characteristics of wounded warriors with ≥1 open extremity wound were assessed, focusing on injury patterns and infection risk factors. Through a separate trauma-associated osteomyelitis study, military personnel with combat-related open fractures of the long bones (tibia, femur, and upper extremity) sustained between 2003 and 2009 were examined to identify osteomyelitis risk factors.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAmong 1,271 wounded warriors with ≥1 open extremity wound, 16% were diagnosed with a CEWI. When assessed by their most severe extremity injury (i.e., amputation, open fracture, or open soft-tissue wound), patients with amputations had the highest proportion of infections (47% of 212 patients with traumatic amputations). Factors related to injury pattern, mechanism, and severity were independent predictors of CEWIs during initial hospitalization. Having a non-extremity infection at least 4 days before CEWI diagnosis was associated with reduced likelihood of CEWI development. After hospital discharge, 28% of patients with extremity trauma had a new or recurrent CEWI during follow-up. Risk factors for the development of CEWIs during follow-up included injury pattern, having either a CEWI or other infection during initial hospitalization, and receipt of antipseudomonal penicillin for ≥7 days. A reduced likelihood for CEWIs during follow-up was associated with a hospitalization duration of 15-30 days. Under the retrospective osteomyelitis risk factor analysis, patients developing osteomyelitis had higher open fracture severity based on Gustilo-Anderson (GA) and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification schemes and more frequent traumatic amputations compared to open fracture patients without osteomyelitis. Recurrence of osteomyelitis was also common (28% of patients with open tibia fractures had a recurrent episode). Although osteomyelitis risk factors differed between the tibia, femur, and upper extremity groups, sustaining an amputation, use of antibiotic beads, and being injured in the earlier years of the study (before significant practice pattern changes) were consistent predictors. Other risk factors included GA fracture severity ≥IIIb, blast injuries, foreign body at fracture site (with/without orthopedic implant), moderate/severe muscle damage and/or necrosis, and moderate/severe skin/soft-tissue damage. For upper extremity open fractures, initial stabilization following evacuation from the combat zone was associated with a reduced likelihood of osteomyelitis.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nForthcoming studies will examine the effectiveness of common antibiotic regimens for managing extremity deep soft-tissue infections to improve clinical outcomes of combat casualties and support development of clinical practice guidelines for CEWI treatment. The long-term impact of extremity trauma and resultant infections will be further investigated through both Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs follow-up, as well as examination of the impact on comorbidities and mental health/social factors.","PeriodicalId":86137,"journal":{"name":"Military surgeon","volume":"187 Supplement_2 1","pages":"25-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Extremity trauma is the most common battlefield injury, resulting in a high frequency of combat-related extremity wound infections (CEWIs). As these infections are associated with substantial morbidity and may impact wounded warriors long after initial hospitalization, CEWIs have been a focus of the Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program (IDCRP). Herein, we review findings of CEWI research conducted through the IDCRP and discuss future and ongoing analyses. METHODS Military personnel with deployment-related trauma sustained between 2009 and 2014 were examined in retrospective analyses through the observational Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study (TIDOS). Characteristics of wounded warriors with ≥1 open extremity wound were assessed, focusing on injury patterns and infection risk factors. Through a separate trauma-associated osteomyelitis study, military personnel with combat-related open fractures of the long bones (tibia, femur, and upper extremity) sustained between 2003 and 2009 were examined to identify osteomyelitis risk factors. RESULTS Among 1,271 wounded warriors with ≥1 open extremity wound, 16% were diagnosed with a CEWI. When assessed by their most severe extremity injury (i.e., amputation, open fracture, or open soft-tissue wound), patients with amputations had the highest proportion of infections (47% of 212 patients with traumatic amputations). Factors related to injury pattern, mechanism, and severity were independent predictors of CEWIs during initial hospitalization. Having a non-extremity infection at least 4 days before CEWI diagnosis was associated with reduced likelihood of CEWI development. After hospital discharge, 28% of patients with extremity trauma had a new or recurrent CEWI during follow-up. Risk factors for the development of CEWIs during follow-up included injury pattern, having either a CEWI or other infection during initial hospitalization, and receipt of antipseudomonal penicillin for ≥7 days. A reduced likelihood for CEWIs during follow-up was associated with a hospitalization duration of 15-30 days. Under the retrospective osteomyelitis risk factor analysis, patients developing osteomyelitis had higher open fracture severity based on Gustilo-Anderson (GA) and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification schemes and more frequent traumatic amputations compared to open fracture patients without osteomyelitis. Recurrence of osteomyelitis was also common (28% of patients with open tibia fractures had a recurrent episode). Although osteomyelitis risk factors differed between the tibia, femur, and upper extremity groups, sustaining an amputation, use of antibiotic beads, and being injured in the earlier years of the study (before significant practice pattern changes) were consistent predictors. Other risk factors included GA fracture severity ≥IIIb, blast injuries, foreign body at fracture site (with/without orthopedic implant), moderate/severe muscle damage and/or necrosis, and moderate/severe skin/soft-tissue damage. For upper extremity open fractures, initial stabilization following evacuation from the combat zone was associated with a reduced likelihood of osteomyelitis. CONCLUSIONS Forthcoming studies will examine the effectiveness of common antibiotic regimens for managing extremity deep soft-tissue infections to improve clinical outcomes of combat casualties and support development of clinical practice guidelines for CEWI treatment. The long-term impact of extremity trauma and resultant infections will be further investigated through both Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs follow-up, as well as examination of the impact on comorbidities and mental health/social factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IDCRP与战斗相关的四肢创伤感染研究。
简介肢体创伤是最常见的战场损伤,导致与战斗相关的肢体创伤感染(CEWIs)的频率很高。由于这些感染与严重的发病率有关,并且可能在首次住院后很长一段时间内影响受伤的战士,因此CEWI一直是传染病临床研究计划(IDCRP)的重点。在此,我们回顾了通过IDCRP进行的CEWI研究结果,并讨论了未来和正在进行的分析。方法通过观察性创伤传染病结果研究(TIDOS)对2009年至2014年间遭受部署相关创伤的军事人员进行回顾性分析。对四肢开放性创伤≥1例的伤员的特征进行了评估,重点关注损伤模式和感染风险因素。通过另一项与创伤相关的骨髓炎研究,对2003年至2009年间遭受战斗相关长骨(胫骨、股骨和上肢)开放性骨折的军事人员进行了检查,以确定骨髓炎的危险因素。结果1271名四肢开放性创伤≥1处的伤员中,16%被诊断为CEWI。当根据最严重的肢体损伤(即截肢、开放性骨折或开放性软组织伤口)进行评估时,截肢患者的感染比例最高(212名创伤性截肢患者中有47%)。与损伤模式、机制和严重程度相关的因素是初次住院期间CEWIs的独立预测因素。在CEWI诊断前至少4天发生非四肢感染与CEWI发展的可能性降低有关。出院后,28%的四肢创伤患者在随访期间出现了新的或复发的CEWI。随访期间发生CEWI的风险因素包括损伤模式、首次住院期间发生CEWIs或其他感染,以及接受抗假阳性青霉素≥7天。随访期间发生CEWIs的可能性降低与15-30天的住院时间有关。根据回顾性骨髓炎危险因素分析,根据Gustilo Anderson(GA)和骨科创伤协会分类方案,患有骨髓炎的患者开放性骨折的严重程度更高,与没有骨髓炎的开放性骨折患者相比,创伤性截肢更频繁。骨髓炎的复发也很常见(28%的胫骨开放性骨折患者有复发)。尽管胫骨、股骨和上肢组的骨髓炎危险因素不同,但在研究的早期(在显著的实践模式改变之前),截肢、使用抗生素珠和受伤是一致的预测因素。其他危险因素包括GA骨折严重程度≥IIIb、爆炸伤、骨折部位异物(有/没有骨科植入物)、中度/重度肌肉损伤和/或坏死以及中度/重度皮肤/软组织损伤。对于上肢开放性骨折,从战区撤离后的初步稳定与骨髓炎的可能性降低有关。结论未来的研究将检验常见抗生素方案治疗四肢深部软组织感染的有效性,以改善战斗伤亡的临床结果,并支持制定CEWI治疗的临床实践指南。将通过国防部和退伍军人事务部的随访,以及对合并症和心理健康/社会因素的影响进行检查,进一步调查肢体创伤和由此产生的感染的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Race Differences in Veteran's Affairs Emergency Department Utilization. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Boston Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury-Lifetime Clinical Interview Compared to Department of Defense Medical Records. Symptoms and Central Sensory Integration in People With Chronic mTBI: Clinical Implications. Correlates of Dietary Behaviors Among Young Emirati Males Completing Compulsory Military Service. Physiological Demands and Characteristics of Movement During Simulated Combat.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1