Gender in the New Education Policy 2016 in the Making

Q1 Social Sciences Higher Education for the Future Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI:10.1177/2347631117706260
K. Chanana
{"title":"Gender in the New Education Policy 2016 in the Making","authors":"K. Chanana","doi":"10.1177/2347631117706260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no doubt that until now significant progress has been made to include gender in the Indian education policy. Further, it is also recognized that investment in the education of both boys and girls with focus on equity is consistently the most powerful and important indicator of national development, as well as being a vehicle for the advancement of the present and future generations of children. Therefore, leaving out issues of gender and girls’ education puts a question mark on the future vision of society. Right now, the new education policy is in the making, after a gap of 24 years. There are two documents in the public domain. The first one was an outcome of a very extensive and expansive process of consultations. This article interrogates the process of policy formulation by looking at texts of these two reports as primary data sources. The central concern in this article is to show the complete or near complete gender blindness or exclusion of concerns regarding education of girls and women in the two documents. As a result, there is no or hardly any space given to them in these documents which presumably will go into the formulation of the new education policy. What is required is a focus on equality and a transformative conception of gender inclusiveness in the new policy, which will ensure meaningful and realistic inclusion of gender concerns.","PeriodicalId":36834,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education for the Future","volume":"4 1","pages":"117 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2347631117706260","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education for the Future","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631117706260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is no doubt that until now significant progress has been made to include gender in the Indian education policy. Further, it is also recognized that investment in the education of both boys and girls with focus on equity is consistently the most powerful and important indicator of national development, as well as being a vehicle for the advancement of the present and future generations of children. Therefore, leaving out issues of gender and girls’ education puts a question mark on the future vision of society. Right now, the new education policy is in the making, after a gap of 24 years. There are two documents in the public domain. The first one was an outcome of a very extensive and expansive process of consultations. This article interrogates the process of policy formulation by looking at texts of these two reports as primary data sources. The central concern in this article is to show the complete or near complete gender blindness or exclusion of concerns regarding education of girls and women in the two documents. As a result, there is no or hardly any space given to them in these documents which presumably will go into the formulation of the new education policy. What is required is a focus on equality and a transformative conception of gender inclusiveness in the new policy, which will ensure meaningful and realistic inclusion of gender concerns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2016年新教育政策中的性别问题
毫无疑问,到目前为止,在将性别纳入印度教育政策方面已经取得了重大进展。此外,人们还认识到,以平等为重点对男孩和女孩的教育进行投资始终是国家发展的最有力和最重要的指标,也是提高今世后代儿童的一种手段。因此,忽略性别和女童教育问题会给社会的未来前景打上一个问号。现在,时隔24年,新的教育政策正在制定中。有两份文件属于公共领域。第一个协议是一个非常广泛和广泛的协商进程的结果。本文通过查看这两份报告的文本作为主要数据来源,来探讨政策制定的过程。本文的中心关切是要表明这两份文件完全或近乎完全无视性别,或排除了对女童和妇女教育的关切。因此,在这些文件中没有或几乎没有给他们任何空间,这些文件可能会用于制定新的教育政策。需要的是在新政策中注重平等和变革性的性别包容概念,这将确保有意义和现实地纳入性别关切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education for the Future
Higher Education for the Future Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Reimagining English Language Teaching: Towards Developing a Heutagogical Framework The Use of Case Technology for the Formation of Information Competence for the Future Teachers of Mathematics The Content and Methodological Features of Professionally Oriented Training of Engineering Students in Higher Mathematics Higher Order Knowledge: The Challenge of Transmission Curriculum and Community with Research, Action and Service (CCBALwRAS), a Pedagogical Shift for Social Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1