Variation between modal adverbs in British English

IF 0.6 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Functions of Language Pub Date : 2018-11-02 DOI:10.1075/FOL.16009.SUZ
Daisuke Suzuki
{"title":"Variation between modal adverbs in British English","authors":"Daisuke Suzuki","doi":"10.1075/FOL.16009.SUZ","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigates the use and distribution of the synonymous adverbs maybe and perhaps in\n order to determine their functional similarities and differences. After extracting usage data from the British National Corpus\n (BNC), this study explores the following factors by analyzing the target adverbs in a larger context: (i) the kind of register,\n (ii) the kind of NP chosen as the subject in maybe/perhaps clauses, (iii) the kind of modal verb used in the same\n clause, and (iv) the position occupied by the target adverbs in a clause. The corpus analysis demonstrates that\n maybe is more prone to subjective use while perhaps is a more strongly grammaticalized item,\n and that the factors related to a highly subjective context contribute much to the variation between the adverbs. In addition, I\n suggest that both maybe and perhaps (in combination with modal verbs or in final position) can\n be used in an intersubjective context.","PeriodicalId":44232,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functions of Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/FOL.16009.SUZ","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study investigates the use and distribution of the synonymous adverbs maybe and perhaps in order to determine their functional similarities and differences. After extracting usage data from the British National Corpus (BNC), this study explores the following factors by analyzing the target adverbs in a larger context: (i) the kind of register, (ii) the kind of NP chosen as the subject in maybe/perhaps clauses, (iii) the kind of modal verb used in the same clause, and (iv) the position occupied by the target adverbs in a clause. The corpus analysis demonstrates that maybe is more prone to subjective use while perhaps is a more strongly grammaticalized item, and that the factors related to a highly subjective context contribute much to the variation between the adverbs. In addition, I suggest that both maybe and perhaps (in combination with modal verbs or in final position) can be used in an intersubjective context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英式英语中情态副词的变化
本文研究了同义副词maybe和maybe的使用和分布,以确定它们在功能上的异同。本研究从英国国家语料库(British National Corpus, BNC)中提取使用数据,通过分析目标副词在更大语境下的影响因素,探讨了以下几个方面:(i)语域类型;(ii) maybe/ maybe从句中主语选择的NP类型;(iii)同一从句中使用的情态动词类型;(iv)目标副词在从句中所占的位置。语料库分析表明,maybe更倾向于主观使用,而maybe是一个语法化程度更强的词,并且与高度主观语境相关的因素对副词之间的差异有很大影响。此外,我建议maybe和perhaps(与情态动词结合或在最后位置)都可以在主体间语境中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Functions of Language is an international journal of linguistics which explores the functionalist perspective on the organisation and use of natural language. It encourages the interplay of theory and description, and provides space for the detailed analysis, qualitative or quantitative, of linguistic data from a broad range of languages. Its scope is broad, covering such matters as prosodic phenomena in phonology, the clause in its communicative context, and regularities of pragmatics, conversation and discourse, as well as the interaction between the various levels of analysis. The overall purpose is to contribute to our understanding of how the use of languages in speech and writing has impacted, and continues to impact, upon the structure of those languages.
期刊最新文献
The functions of evidentiality Review of Yus (2023): Pragmatics of internet humour Definite-like meaning of bare classifiers in Nung Cardinal direction judgment based on the integration of spatial reference frames in different languages Review of Kim, Martin, Shin & Choi (2023): Korean grammar: A systemic functional approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1