A COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT DEFENSIVE BASED PLAYING FORMATIONS ON THE RUNNING ACTIVITY PROFILES OF SOCCER TEAMS

IF 0.2 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Kinesiologia Slovenica Pub Date : 2021-09-13 DOI:10.52165/kinsi.27.2.62-71

O. Çetin, Ozkan Isik, M. Beyleroğlu, Erdi Tokul, Muhsin Hazar

{"title":"A COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT DEFENSIVE BASED PLAYING FORMATIONS ON THE RUNNING ACTIVITY PROFILES OF SOCCER TEAMS","authors":"O. Çetin, Ozkan Isik, M. Beyleroğlu, Erdi Tokul, Muhsin Hazar","doi":"10.52165/kinsi.27.2.62-71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine the effects of two different defensive based playing formations (3-Defender formation and 4-Defender formation) on both the reference and the opponent teams\\' running activity profiles. 8 official matches (n=4, 3-Defender formation; n=4, 4-Defender formation) of Galatasaray football team (Turkish Super League) and opposition teams performed with two different playing formations were monitored. The sample matches were monitored and analyzed using a multiple-camera computerized tracking system. Running activity data variables obtained from the software were analyzed in 5 different categories (total running distance in kilometers, mean speed in km.h-1, high-intensity running (20 km.h-1 to 24 km.h-1) distance in meters, sprint (>24 km.h-1) distance, sprint numbers. The results of this study indicate that running activity profiles of reference and opposition teams generally do not differ (p >0.05) according to the different game formation of the reference team. Only the reference team\\'s total running distance was higher (p <0.05) in the 4-Defender formation than the 3-Defender formation (2.52%).","PeriodicalId":43206,"journal":{"name":"Kinesiologia Slovenica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesiologia Slovenica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52165/kinsi.27.2.62-71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effects of two different defensive based playing formations (3-Defender formation and 4-Defender formation) on both the reference and the opponent teams\' running activity profiles. 8 official matches (n=4, 3-Defender formation; n=4, 4-Defender formation) of Galatasaray football team (Turkish Super League) and opposition teams performed with two different playing formations were monitored. The sample matches were monitored and analyzed using a multiple-camera computerized tracking system. Running activity data variables obtained from the software were analyzed in 5 different categories (total running distance in kilometers, mean speed in km.h-1, high-intensity running (20 km.h-1 to 24 km.h-1) distance in meters, sprint (>24 km.h-1) distance, sprint numbers. The results of this study indicate that running activity profiles of reference and opposition teams generally do not differ (p >0.05) according to the different game formation of the reference team. Only the reference team\'s total running distance was higher (p <0.05) in the 4-Defender formation than the 3-Defender formation (2.52%).

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

两种不同防守型打法对足球队跑动活动特征的比较

本研究旨在考察两种不同的防守阵型(3-后卫阵型和4-后卫阵型)对参考队和对手队跑动活动概况的影响。8场正式比赛(n= 4,3 -后卫阵型;对土耳其超级联赛加拉塔萨雷队(n= 4,4 -后卫阵型)和采用两种不同阵型的对手球队进行了监测。使用多摄像机计算机跟踪系统对样品匹配进行监测和分析。从软件中获得的跑步活动数据变量分为5个不同的类别(跑步总距离(km)、平均速度(km.h-1)、高强度跑步(20 km.h-1 ~ 24 km.h-1)距离(米)、冲刺(>24 km.h-1)距离、冲刺次数。本研究结果表明，参照队和对手队的跑动活动特征一般不会因参照队的比赛阵型不同而产生差异(p >0.05)。只有参考队4-后卫阵型的总跑动距离高于3-后卫阵型(p <0.05)(2.52%)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Kinesiologia Slovenica SPORT SCIENCES-

自引率

0.00%

发文量