National Health Guidelines for Social Connection: What Is the Evidence in Support and What Might the Guidelines Say?

IF 3.4 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1177/23727322221150204
J. Holt‐Lunstad
{"title":"National Health Guidelines for Social Connection: What Is the Evidence in Support and What Might the Guidelines Say?","authors":"J. Holt‐Lunstad","doi":"10.1177/23727322221150204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National health guidelines provide policy makers and the public with recommendations for various behavioral factors known to promote health and reduce disease risk, such as diet and physical activity. Given public health concerns about social isolation, loneliness, and other forms of lacking social connection, the evidence supports establishing national health guidelines for “social connection.” The aggregate body of scientific evidence demonstrates social connection protects health and reduces health risks, pointing to clear relevance for public health. Taken together with national trends suggesting greater social disconnection, there is a compelling case for national preventative efforts. This article summarizes evidence on the health relevance of social connections, potential opportunities, and challenges in establishing and implementing guidelines, the process of establishing guidelines, and provides illustrative evidence-based examples of potential recommendations.","PeriodicalId":52185,"journal":{"name":"Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":"41 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322221150204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

National health guidelines provide policy makers and the public with recommendations for various behavioral factors known to promote health and reduce disease risk, such as diet and physical activity. Given public health concerns about social isolation, loneliness, and other forms of lacking social connection, the evidence supports establishing national health guidelines for “social connection.” The aggregate body of scientific evidence demonstrates social connection protects health and reduces health risks, pointing to clear relevance for public health. Taken together with national trends suggesting greater social disconnection, there is a compelling case for national preventative efforts. This article summarizes evidence on the health relevance of social connections, potential opportunities, and challenges in establishing and implementing guidelines, the process of establishing guidelines, and provides illustrative evidence-based examples of potential recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家社会联系健康指南:支持的证据是什么?指南可能会说什么?
国家健康指南为决策者和公众提供了关于促进健康和减少疾病风险的各种已知行为因素的建议,例如饮食和体育活动。鉴于公共卫生对社会隔离、孤独和其他形式的缺乏社会联系的担忧,有证据支持为“社会联系”制定国家卫生指南。综合科学证据表明,社会联系可以保护健康并降低健康风险,这表明社会联系与公共卫生有着明确的关联。结合表明社会脱节加剧的国家趋势,有一个令人信服的理由,要求国家采取预防措施。本文总结了社会关系与健康相关的证据、建立和实施指南的潜在机遇和挑战、制定指南的过程,并提供了潜在建议的说明性证据示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Catalyzing Equity in STEM Teams: Harnessing Generative AI for Inclusion and Diversity. How Decision Making Develops: Adolescents, Irrational Adults, and Should AI be Trusted With the Car Keys? Supporting Multilingualism in Immigrant Children: An Integrative Approach Designing for Sensory Adaptation: What You See Depends on What You’ve Been Looking at - Recommendations, Guidelines and Standards Should Reflect This ED-AI Lit: An Interdisciplinary Framework for AI Literacy in Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1