Limiting Multiculturalism Discourse by Legislating Support for Multicultural Families in Korea

Q2 Arts and Humanities Asian International Studies Review Pub Date : 2022-06-21 DOI:10.1163/2667078x-bja10013
Yihyun Ryu
{"title":"Limiting Multiculturalism Discourse by Legislating Support for Multicultural Families in Korea","authors":"Yihyun Ryu","doi":"10.1163/2667078x-bja10013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nDrawing on the Foucauldian theoretical concepts of governmentality and genealogy as a method for grasping the unconventional reality of multiculturalism discourse in South Korea, this paper aims to go beyond ahistorical accounts of multicultural policy. The article offers an analysis of policy discourses relating to multicultural families in South Korea, and it examines the strategies utilized by the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family to maintain and expand its ministerial jurisdiction. Such analyses reveal how policy discourse has shifted away from Korean blood-based ethnicity and the “mixed-blood” category of people in favor of focusing on female marriage migrants and their families. Furthermore, the examination highlights how legislation that supports these families conceptualizes female migrants as apolitical, family-oriented, and maternal beings. This conceptualization is legitimized by the ministerial strategies adopted by “femocrats,” government officials affiliated with the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family.","PeriodicalId":37023,"journal":{"name":"Asian International Studies Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian International Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2667078x-bja10013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing on the Foucauldian theoretical concepts of governmentality and genealogy as a method for grasping the unconventional reality of multiculturalism discourse in South Korea, this paper aims to go beyond ahistorical accounts of multicultural policy. The article offers an analysis of policy discourses relating to multicultural families in South Korea, and it examines the strategies utilized by the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family to maintain and expand its ministerial jurisdiction. Such analyses reveal how policy discourse has shifted away from Korean blood-based ethnicity and the “mixed-blood” category of people in favor of focusing on female marriage migrants and their families. Furthermore, the examination highlights how legislation that supports these families conceptualizes female migrants as apolitical, family-oriented, and maternal beings. This conceptualization is legitimized by the ministerial strategies adopted by “femocrats,” government officials affiliated with the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过立法支持韩国多元文化家庭来限制多元文化主义话语
本文借鉴傅关于政府心态和谱系学的理论概念,作为把握韩国多元文化话语非传统现实的一种方法,旨在超越对多元文化政策的非历史性描述。本文分析了韩国与多元文化家庭有关的政策论述,并考察了两性平等和家庭部为维持和扩大其部长管辖权而采取的战略。这些分析揭示了政策话语是如何从基于韩国血统的种族和“混血”人群转向关注女性婚姻移民及其家庭的。此外,该审查强调了支持这些家庭的立法如何将女性移民概念化为非政治、面向家庭和母性的存在。隶属于两性平等和家庭部的政府官员“女性官员”通过的部长战略使这种概念化合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian International Studies Review
Asian International Studies Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Liberal Convergence or Differential Exclusion? Temporary Labor Migration Policy in Japan and Korea The Impacts of Community-Driven Development Program in Conflict-Affected Regions: Evidence from Cambodia Assessing the Political Clout of Thailand’s “Monarchized” Military in 2023 Whose Ideas Matter? The Changing Meaning of Health Protocols in Indonesia’s Border Management Policies in the Pandemic Era Securitizing Non-Traditional Security (NTS) Threats: China’s Track 2 Diplomacy in Southeast Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1