Simulating organ biomass variability and carbohydrate distribution in perennial fruit crops: a comparison between the common assimilate pool and phloem carbohydrate transport models

IF 2.6 Q1 AGRONOMY in silico Plants Pub Date : 2021-08-12 DOI:10.1093/insilicoplants/diab024
Junqi Zhu, F. Gou, G. Rossouw, Fareeda Begum, M. Henke, Ella Johnson, B. Holzapfel, Stewart K. Field, A. Seleznyova
{"title":"Simulating organ biomass variability and carbohydrate distribution in perennial fruit crops: a comparison between the common assimilate pool and phloem carbohydrate transport models","authors":"Junqi Zhu, F. Gou, G. Rossouw, Fareeda Begum, M. Henke, Ella Johnson, B. Holzapfel, Stewart K. Field, A. Seleznyova","doi":"10.1093/insilicoplants/diab024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Variability in fruit quality greatly impedes the profitability of an orchard. Modelling can help find the causes of quality variability. However, studies suggest that the common assimilate pool model is inadequate in terms of describing variability in organ biomass. The aim of the current study was to compare the performances of the common assimilate pool and phloem carbohydrate transport models in simulating phloem carbohydrate concentration and organ biomass variability within the whole-plant functional-structural grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) model that we developed previously. A statistical approach was developed for calibrating the model with a detailed potted experiment that entails three levels of leaf area per vine during the fruit ripening period. Global sensitivity analysis illustrated that carbohydrate allocation changed with the amount of leaf area as well as the limiting factors for organ biomass development. Under a homogenous canopy architecture where all grape bunches were equally close to the carbohydrate sources, the common assimilate pool and phloem transport models produced very similar results. However, under a heterogeneous canopy architecture with variable distance between bunches and carbohydrate sources, the coefficient of variation for fruit biomass rose from 0.01 to 0.17 as crop load increased. These results indicate that carbohydrate allocation to fruits is affected by both the size of crop load and fruit distribution, which is not adequately described by the common assimilate pool model. The new grapevine model can also simulate dynamic canopy growth and be adapted to help optimise canopy architecture and quality variability of other perennial fruit crops.","PeriodicalId":36138,"journal":{"name":"in silico Plants","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"in silico Plants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/insilicoplants/diab024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Variability in fruit quality greatly impedes the profitability of an orchard. Modelling can help find the causes of quality variability. However, studies suggest that the common assimilate pool model is inadequate in terms of describing variability in organ biomass. The aim of the current study was to compare the performances of the common assimilate pool and phloem carbohydrate transport models in simulating phloem carbohydrate concentration and organ biomass variability within the whole-plant functional-structural grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) model that we developed previously. A statistical approach was developed for calibrating the model with a detailed potted experiment that entails three levels of leaf area per vine during the fruit ripening period. Global sensitivity analysis illustrated that carbohydrate allocation changed with the amount of leaf area as well as the limiting factors for organ biomass development. Under a homogenous canopy architecture where all grape bunches were equally close to the carbohydrate sources, the common assimilate pool and phloem transport models produced very similar results. However, under a heterogeneous canopy architecture with variable distance between bunches and carbohydrate sources, the coefficient of variation for fruit biomass rose from 0.01 to 0.17 as crop load increased. These results indicate that carbohydrate allocation to fruits is affected by both the size of crop load and fruit distribution, which is not adequately described by the common assimilate pool model. The new grapevine model can also simulate dynamic canopy growth and be adapted to help optimise canopy architecture and quality variability of other perennial fruit crops.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟多年生水果作物器官生物量变异和碳水化合物分布:共同同化库和韧皮部碳水化合物运输模型的比较
水果质量的可变性极大地阻碍了果园的盈利能力。建模可以帮助找出质量变化的原因。然而,研究表明,普通同化物库模型在描述器官生物量的可变性方面是不够的。本研究的目的是比较我们之前开发的全植物功能结构葡萄(Vitis vinifera L.)模型中常见同化物库和韧皮部碳水化合物运输模型在模拟韧皮部碳水化合物浓度和器官生物量变异方面的性能。开发了一种统计方法,通过详细的盆栽实验来校准模型,该实验要求在果实成熟期每棵葡萄的叶面积达到三个水平。全局敏感性分析表明,碳水化合物分配随叶面积的大小以及器官生物量发育的限制因素而变化。在所有葡萄串都同样接近碳水化合物来源的同质冠层结构下,常见的同化物库和韧皮部运输模型产生了非常相似的结果。然而,在树干和碳水化合物来源之间距离可变的异质冠层结构下,随着作物负荷的增加,果实生物量的变异系数从0.01上升到0.17。这些结果表明,碳水化合物对水果的分配受到作物负荷大小和水果分布的影响,而普通同化物库模型没有充分描述这一点。新的葡萄藤模型还可以模拟动态冠层生长,并有助于优化其他多年生水果作物的冠层结构和质量变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
in silico Plants
in silico Plants Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Model-based inference of a dual role for HOPS in regulating guard cell vacuole fusion. Playing a crop simulation model using symbols and sounds: the ‘mandala’ A Scalable Pipeline to Create Synthetic Datasets from Functional-Structural Plant Models for Deep Learning In a PICKLE: A gold standard entity and relation corpus for the molecular plant sciences A comparison of empirical and mechanistic models for wheat yield prediction at field level in Moroccan rainfed areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1