Different Minority Groups Elicit Different Safety, Economic, Power, and Symbolic Threats

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Human Affairs-Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.1515/humaff-2022-2031
Dóra Kanyicska Belán, M. Popper
{"title":"Different Minority Groups Elicit Different Safety, Economic, Power, and Symbolic Threats","authors":"Dóra Kanyicska Belán, M. Popper","doi":"10.1515/humaff-2022-2031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Populistic political discourse often portrays ethnic minorities as threats to the majority society. However, the deeper characteristics of perceived threats have not been sufficiently empirically investigated. The goal of this study is to identify the similarities and differences in intergroup threats perceived by Slovak majority from Roma, Muslims, and ethnic Hungarian minorities. The participants included 1244 adults who were instructed to write the first five associations that came to mind when thinking about one of the minorities. Our findings indicate that power threat was dominant from the Hungarian minority and safety threat from the Roma and Muslim minorities. Moreover, the safety threat from the Roma minority related mainly to theft and violence, while from Muslims it was terrorism. Mapping and addressing specific threats associated with different minorities can help explain misperceptions and reduce prejudice against them.","PeriodicalId":44829,"journal":{"name":"Human Affairs-Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly","volume":"33 1","pages":"51 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Affairs-Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2022-2031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Populistic political discourse often portrays ethnic minorities as threats to the majority society. However, the deeper characteristics of perceived threats have not been sufficiently empirically investigated. The goal of this study is to identify the similarities and differences in intergroup threats perceived by Slovak majority from Roma, Muslims, and ethnic Hungarian minorities. The participants included 1244 adults who were instructed to write the first five associations that came to mind when thinking about one of the minorities. Our findings indicate that power threat was dominant from the Hungarian minority and safety threat from the Roma and Muslim minorities. Moreover, the safety threat from the Roma minority related mainly to theft and violence, while from Muslims it was terrorism. Mapping and addressing specific threats associated with different minorities can help explain misperceptions and reduce prejudice against them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同的少数群体引出不同的安全、经济、权力和象征性威胁
摘要民粹主义政治话语经常将少数民族描绘成对多数社会的威胁。然而,尚未对感知到的威胁的深层特征进行充分的实证研究。本研究的目的是确定斯洛伐克多数民族从罗姆人、穆斯林和匈牙利少数民族感受到的群体间威胁的相似性和差异性。参与者包括1244名成年人,他们被要求写下在思考少数民族时想到的前五个联想。我们的研究结果表明,权力威胁主要来自匈牙利少数民族,安全威胁主要来自罗姆人和穆斯林少数民族。此外,罗姆少数民族的安全威胁主要与盗窃和暴力有关,而穆斯林的安全威胁则是恐怖主义。绘制和解决与不同少数群体有关的具体威胁有助于解释误解,减少对他们的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter Audience Democracy 2.0: Re-Depersonalizing Politics in the Digital Age Kasanda, A. and Hrubec, M. (Eds.): Africa in a Multilateral World. Afropolitan Dilemmas. New York, London: Routledge. Routledge Contemporary Africa Series, 2022. Back from the Future. Remarks on Temporality and Totality in the Birth of Classical German Philosophy Philosophy and Jena Romanticism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1