Therapeutic capability of selected medicinal plants' bioactive constituents against the mutant ovarian TP53 gene; a computational approach

Kayode Yomi Raheem , Fawehinmi Praise Ibukunoluwa , Solomon Ayodele Olorundare , Jairus Olumasai Nandwa , Modinat Aina Abayomi , Egbe Justine Uchechukwu , Mary Adewunmi , Kuyet Zichat Blessing , Modupe Mercy Anthony , Mary Ikeoluwa Gbadebo , Falana Taiwo Daniel
{"title":"Therapeutic capability of selected medicinal plants' bioactive constituents against the mutant ovarian TP53 gene; a computational approach","authors":"Kayode Yomi Raheem ,&nbsp;Fawehinmi Praise Ibukunoluwa ,&nbsp;Solomon Ayodele Olorundare ,&nbsp;Jairus Olumasai Nandwa ,&nbsp;Modinat Aina Abayomi ,&nbsp;Egbe Justine Uchechukwu ,&nbsp;Mary Adewunmi ,&nbsp;Kuyet Zichat Blessing ,&nbsp;Modupe Mercy Anthony ,&nbsp;Mary Ikeoluwa Gbadebo ,&nbsp;Falana Taiwo Daniel","doi":"10.1016/j.abst.2023.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A mutant P53 protein plays such a crucial role in ovarian cancer, and natural compounds have been known to be effective in treating cancer. The current study was conducted to discover new mutant P53 modulators in plants used for medicinal purposes. The mutant p53 3D structure was built using homology modeling, while its active binding domain was predicted using Findsitecom2.0. Docking studies were conducted with ligands derived from bioactive components of seven different plants and mutant p53 binding sites. Autodocking programs, including Discovery Studio and PyRx, were used to obtain the docking protein and its intricate visual representation. Gemcitabine and thiotepa were the reference drugs. Acute RAT toxicity and Pharmacokinetic properties were utilized in Gusar and SWISSADME, respectively, to narrow down the hit compounds to those with the highest binding affinities. Using the density functional theory (DFT) method, the electronic properties of the bioactive constituents were determined. 15 of the 50 bioactive phytochemicals displayed superior mutant p53 binding energies compared to Gemcitabine and Thioteba (−5.4 and −3.5 binding scores, respectively). Considering acute toxicity predictions and pharmacokinetics, 10-hydroxycamptothecin, irinotecan, morusin, and rubitecan were the four major compounds with low toxicity. DFT calculations uncovered regions susceptible to nucleophilic and electrophilic assaults. The study sought to identify potential drug candidates for modulating mutant P53 in ovarian cancer treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72080,"journal":{"name":"Advances in biomarker sciences and technology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 8-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in biomarker sciences and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543106423000029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

A mutant P53 protein plays such a crucial role in ovarian cancer, and natural compounds have been known to be effective in treating cancer. The current study was conducted to discover new mutant P53 modulators in plants used for medicinal purposes. The mutant p53 3D structure was built using homology modeling, while its active binding domain was predicted using Findsitecom2.0. Docking studies were conducted with ligands derived from bioactive components of seven different plants and mutant p53 binding sites. Autodocking programs, including Discovery Studio and PyRx, were used to obtain the docking protein and its intricate visual representation. Gemcitabine and thiotepa were the reference drugs. Acute RAT toxicity and Pharmacokinetic properties were utilized in Gusar and SWISSADME, respectively, to narrow down the hit compounds to those with the highest binding affinities. Using the density functional theory (DFT) method, the electronic properties of the bioactive constituents were determined. 15 of the 50 bioactive phytochemicals displayed superior mutant p53 binding energies compared to Gemcitabine and Thioteba (−5.4 and −3.5 binding scores, respectively). Considering acute toxicity predictions and pharmacokinetics, 10-hydroxycamptothecin, irinotecan, morusin, and rubitecan were the four major compounds with low toxicity. DFT calculations uncovered regions susceptible to nucleophilic and electrophilic assaults. The study sought to identify potential drug candidates for modulating mutant P53 in ovarian cancer treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
部分药用植物活性成分对卵巢突变型TP53基因的治疗作用计算方法
突变的P53蛋白在卵巢癌中起着至关重要的作用,并且已知天然化合物对治疗癌症有效。目前的研究是为了在药用植物中发现新的突变型P53调节剂。利用同源性建模构建突变体p53的3D结构,利用Findsitecom2.0预测其活性结合域。对接研究采用来自7种不同植物的生物活性成分和突变p53结合位点的配体进行。包括Discovery Studio和PyRx在内的自动对接程序用于获得对接蛋白及其复杂的视觉表示。吉西他滨和硫替帕为对照药物。分别利用Gusar和SWISSADME的急性大鼠毒性和药代动力学特性,将靶向化合物范围缩小到具有最高结合亲和力的化合物。利用密度泛函理论(DFT)方法测定了生物活性成分的电子性质。与吉西他滨和硫替巴相比,50种生物活性植物化学物质中有15种显示出更高的p53突变体结合能(分别为- 5.4和- 3.5)。考虑到急性毒性预测和药代动力学,10-羟基喜树碱、伊立替康、morusin和rubitecan是四种主要的低毒性化合物。DFT计算揭示了易受亲核和亲电攻击的区域。该研究旨在确定卵巢癌治疗中调节P53突变体的潜在候选药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in biomarker sciences and technology
Advances in biomarker sciences and technology Biotechnology, Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Faecal microbial transplant Isolation and characterization of cytotoxic and antioxidant biomarkers from the aerial parts of Suaeda aegyptica Patient-derived primary culture-based prognostic model to predict tumor recurrence in patients with glioma Faecal microbial transplant Investigation of the effects of polyherbal formulations against the combination of a high-fat cafeteria diet along with exercise modalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1