Self-Publishing, Vanity Publishing and Indie Publishing: A Shortcut to Fame or A Dangerous Game?

Widjati Hartiningtyas
{"title":"Self-Publishing, Vanity Publishing and Indie Publishing: A Shortcut to Fame or A Dangerous Game?","authors":"Widjati Hartiningtyas","doi":"10.26714/lensa.13.1.2023.135-150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In November 2022, a Twitter account reported fraud committed by an owner of a well-known vanity publisher. The post that was retweeted thousand times revealed that many authors experience the same thing. Based on that case, this study analyzed reasons that drive authors to self-publish or use vanity and indie publishing service. To answer the research question, the researcher conducted semi-structured interviews with five authors acting as informants. The researcher presents the interview's results in three categories: the romanticism of publishing printed books, idealism in writing, and the prestige of indie publishing. The researcher analyzes the data using Michael Foucault's thoughts in his essay What is an author? This study found that though the informants used alternative publishing because conventional publishers did not accept their works, they had different reasons to continue using alternative publishing. The informants agreed that alternative publishing offers flexibility that enables them to maintain their idealism. However, the informants had different opinions on the classic conflict between idealism and income. The informants do not consider indie publishing more prestigious than conventional publishers or vice versa. However, they have their considerations when choosing a type of publisher. The interviews also showed that a supporting community, a valuable network, and pieces of information are necessary before using alternative publishing.","PeriodicalId":31773,"journal":{"name":"Lensa Kajian Kebahasaan Kesusastraan dan Budaya","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lensa Kajian Kebahasaan Kesusastraan dan Budaya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.13.1.2023.135-150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In November 2022, a Twitter account reported fraud committed by an owner of a well-known vanity publisher. The post that was retweeted thousand times revealed that many authors experience the same thing. Based on that case, this study analyzed reasons that drive authors to self-publish or use vanity and indie publishing service. To answer the research question, the researcher conducted semi-structured interviews with five authors acting as informants. The researcher presents the interview's results in three categories: the romanticism of publishing printed books, idealism in writing, and the prestige of indie publishing. The researcher analyzes the data using Michael Foucault's thoughts in his essay What is an author? This study found that though the informants used alternative publishing because conventional publishers did not accept their works, they had different reasons to continue using alternative publishing. The informants agreed that alternative publishing offers flexibility that enables them to maintain their idealism. However, the informants had different opinions on the classic conflict between idealism and income. The informants do not consider indie publishing more prestigious than conventional publishers or vice versa. However, they have their considerations when choosing a type of publisher. The interviews also showed that a supporting community, a valuable network, and pieces of information are necessary before using alternative publishing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自主发行、虚荣发行和独立发行:成名捷径还是危险游戏?
2022年11月,一个推特账户报告了一家知名虚荣出版商的老板欺诈行为。这条被转发了1000次的帖子显示,许多作者都有同样的经历。在此基础上,本研究分析了促使作者自主出版或使用虚荣和独立出版服务的原因。为了回答这个研究问题,研究人员对五位作为线人的作者进行了半结构化的采访。研究人员将访谈结果分为三类:出版印刷书籍的浪漫主义,写作的理想主义和独立出版的声望。研究者在他的论文《什么是作者?》中运用了迈克尔·福柯的思想来分析数据。本研究发现,虽然告密者使用替代出版是因为传统出版商不接受他们的作品,但他们有不同的原因继续使用替代出版。被调查者一致认为,替代出版提供了灵活性,使他们能够保持理想主义。然而,对于理想主义和收入之间的经典冲突,被调查者们有不同的看法。被调查者并不认为独立发行比传统发行商更有声望,反之亦然。然而,他们在选择发行商类型时也有自己的考虑因素。访谈还表明,在使用替代出版之前,一个支持性的社区、一个有价值的网络和一些信息是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Depression Symptoms on The Dialogues of Laney Brooks in I Smile Back Movie SONG TRANSLATION OF SPEECHLESS BY NAOMI SCOTT: METAPHOR AND UNTRANSLATABILITY Politeness Levels of Thanking and Apologizing: A Corpus Linguistic Investigation Across Generations in the Movies Go Green Culture in Selametan Katerbi’en Tradition of Madura Conceptualization of Metaphor at the Discourse of the Bali G20 Summit in Online Mass Media: Cognitive Semantic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1