The school is not a learning environment: how language matters for the practical study of educational practices

IF 1.9 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Continuing Education Pub Date : 2022-03-12 DOI:10.1080/0158037X.2022.2046556
G. Biesta
{"title":"The school is not a learning environment: how language matters for the practical study of educational practices","authors":"G. Biesta","doi":"10.1080/0158037X.2022.2046556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this invited commentary for the special issue on ‘How built spaces influence practices of educators’ work: An examination through practice lens,’ I discuss how insights from the theory of practice architecture and the theory of practice ontology are helpful in exploring the complexities of educational practices, particularly with reference to the locations within and through which such practices take place. By focusing on the doings, sayings and relatings that take place in such practices and on their material conditions, the contributions add much nuance and detail to the understanding of educational practices, particularly when such practices are ‘in transition’ due to forces that are often beyond the influence of the actors in such practices themselves. The main critical point I make concerns the sayings utilised by the authors themselves. I suggest that references to ‘learning’ are problematic in the study of educational practices. I single out the idea of seeing schools, colleges and universities as ‘learning environments.’ I provide reasons why this way of engaging with educational practices is problematic – both from a research perspective and from a practice and policy perspective – and suggest that the better designation would be that of seeing them as educational practices.","PeriodicalId":46790,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Continuing Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"336 - 346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Continuing Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2022.2046556","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this invited commentary for the special issue on ‘How built spaces influence practices of educators’ work: An examination through practice lens,’ I discuss how insights from the theory of practice architecture and the theory of practice ontology are helpful in exploring the complexities of educational practices, particularly with reference to the locations within and through which such practices take place. By focusing on the doings, sayings and relatings that take place in such practices and on their material conditions, the contributions add much nuance and detail to the understanding of educational practices, particularly when such practices are ‘in transition’ due to forces that are often beyond the influence of the actors in such practices themselves. The main critical point I make concerns the sayings utilised by the authors themselves. I suggest that references to ‘learning’ are problematic in the study of educational practices. I single out the idea of seeing schools, colleges and universities as ‘learning environments.’ I provide reasons why this way of engaging with educational practices is problematic – both from a research perspective and from a practice and policy perspective – and suggest that the better designation would be that of seeing them as educational practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学校不是一个学习环境:语言对教育实践的实践研究如何重要
摘要在“建筑空间如何影响教育工作者的工作实践:通过实践视角的检验”特刊的特邀评论中,我讨论了实践建筑理论和实践本体论的见解如何有助于探索教育实践的复杂性,特别是关于发生这种做法的地点。通过关注这些实践中发生的行为、言论和关系以及它们的物质条件,这些贡献为理解教育实践增加了许多细微之处和细节,尤其是当这些实践由于往往超出这些实践参与者自身影响的力量而处于“过渡期”时。我提出的主要批评点是作者自己使用的语录。我认为,在研究教育实践时,提及“学习”是有问题的。我特别提出了将学校、学院和大学视为“学习环境”的想法我提供了为什么这种参与教育实践的方式存在问题的原因——无论是从研究角度还是从实践和政策角度——并建议更好的指定是将其视为教育实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Continuing Education
Studies in Continuing Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Studies in Continuing Education is a scholarly journal concerned with all aspects of continuing, professional and lifelong learning. It aims to be of special interest to those involved in: •continuing professional education •adults learning •staff development •training and development •human resource development
期刊最新文献
Managers’ sociocognitive conflicts in collaborative learning Learning, instruction and assessment in the workplace: applying and augmenting Communities of Practice theory A work-integrated educational intervention in health and social care – professionals’ experiences of joint education Improving the quality of allied health placements: student, educator and organisational preparedness Feeling like an academic writer: an exploration of doctoral students’ struggle for recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1