Influences of Culture on Transfer Price Negotiation

Mohamed E. Hussein , Michael Kraten , Gim S. Seow , Kinsun Tam
{"title":"Influences of Culture on Transfer Price Negotiation","authors":"Mohamed E. Hussein ,&nbsp;Michael Kraten ,&nbsp;Gim S. Seow ,&nbsp;Kinsun Tam","doi":"10.1016/j.intacc.2017.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Luft and Libby (1997) posit that American transfer price negotiators tend to settle on prices that result in smaller differences in profit between divisions than the external market price will dictate. They attribute the results to a fairness effect. While fairness is present in all cultures, what is considered “fair” differs between cultures (Bian &amp; Keller, 1999; Bolton et al., 2009; Gao, 2009; Surowiecki, 2009). This study ascertains whether cultural affiliation of the negotiator impacts this fairness effect. American and Chinese subjects participated in within-culture and cross-cultural negotiations in an experiment modeled after Luft and Libby (1997). Our results confirm Luft and Libby's (1997) fairness effect when American participants negotiate with each other, but illustrate a contrary effect when Chinese participants negotiate with each other. The negotiator's cultural affiliation is found to determine profit distribution in cross-cultural negotiations. These findings are consistent with longstanding theories of cultural traits (Hofstede, 1980) that are relevant to transfer price negotiation activities. Our results imply that the fairness effect in transfer price negotiation may need to be refined to account for the impact of culture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101232,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Accounting","volume":"52 3","pages":"Pages 227-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.intacc.2017.07.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020706317302571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Luft and Libby (1997) posit that American transfer price negotiators tend to settle on prices that result in smaller differences in profit between divisions than the external market price will dictate. They attribute the results to a fairness effect. While fairness is present in all cultures, what is considered “fair” differs between cultures (Bian & Keller, 1999; Bolton et al., 2009; Gao, 2009; Surowiecki, 2009). This study ascertains whether cultural affiliation of the negotiator impacts this fairness effect. American and Chinese subjects participated in within-culture and cross-cultural negotiations in an experiment modeled after Luft and Libby (1997). Our results confirm Luft and Libby's (1997) fairness effect when American participants negotiate with each other, but illustrate a contrary effect when Chinese participants negotiate with each other. The negotiator's cultural affiliation is found to determine profit distribution in cross-cultural negotiations. These findings are consistent with longstanding theories of cultural traits (Hofstede, 1980) that are relevant to transfer price negotiation activities. Our results imply that the fairness effect in transfer price negotiation may need to be refined to account for the impact of culture.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化对转让价格谈判的影响
Luft和Libby(1997)认为,美国的转让价格谈判者倾向于确定导致部门之间利润差异小于外部市场价格所决定的价格。他们将这一结果归因于公平效应。虽然公平存在于所有文化中,但什么是“公平”在不同文化之间是不同的(bian&凯勒,1999;Bolton et al., 2009;高,2009;Surowiecki, 2009)。本研究确定谈判者的文化归属是否影响这种公平效应。在一个模仿Luft和Libby(1997)的实验中,美国和中国受试者参与了文化内谈判和跨文化谈判。我们的研究结果证实了Luft和Libby(1997)在美国参与者相互谈判时的公平效应,而在中国参与者相互谈判时则相反。研究发现,在跨文化谈判中,谈判者的文化归属决定着利益分配。这些发现与长期存在的与转移价格谈判活动相关的文化特征理论(Hofstede, 1980)是一致的。我们的研究结果表明,转让价格谈判中的公平效应可能需要进一步完善,以考虑文化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Reporting and the Informativeness of Financial Analysts’ Stock Recommendations Climate-Related Financial Risk: Insights from a Semisystematic Review of the Literature and Implications for Financial Reporting Informal Institutions and Audit Pricing: Cross-Country Evidence of National Culture and Audit Fees Discussion of “Climate-Related Financial Risk: Insights from a Semisystematic Review of the Literature and Implications for Financial Reporting” Choice of Participation Method in Setting International Accounting Standards: Evidence from EFRAG as an Intermediary for Indirect Participation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1