The effect of school leaders’ feedback on teaching quality perceived by students – results of an intervention study

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Effectiveness and School Improvement Pub Date : 2022-05-19 DOI:10.1080/09243453.2022.2075018
Christopher Kellermann, Max Nachbauer, H. Gaertner, F. Thiel
{"title":"The effect of school leaders’ feedback on teaching quality perceived by students – results of an intervention study","authors":"Christopher Kellermann, Max Nachbauer, H. Gaertner, F. Thiel","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2022.2075018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Feedback from school leaders often is of low quality and not always effective. Because school leaders spend only limited time on instructional leadership activities, an intervention was developed to assist them in efficiently providing high-quality feedback to teachers. The effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated within a quasi-experimental study. N = 11 school leaders were trained in conducting classroom observations and providing feedback. School leaders observed teachers of the intervention group (N = 26) and provided feedback with regard to 14 teaching characteristics. N = 27 teachers served as a control group. It is examined whether the intervention leads to improvements in teaching quality perceived by students. Multilevel regression analyses were conducted. For three of the 14 teaching characteristics, intervention group students (N = 518) rated changes in teaching quality significantly better than control group students (N = 551). The results provide first evidence for the effectiveness of the intervention.","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":"34 1","pages":"24 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2075018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Feedback from school leaders often is of low quality and not always effective. Because school leaders spend only limited time on instructional leadership activities, an intervention was developed to assist them in efficiently providing high-quality feedback to teachers. The effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated within a quasi-experimental study. N = 11 school leaders were trained in conducting classroom observations and providing feedback. School leaders observed teachers of the intervention group (N = 26) and provided feedback with regard to 14 teaching characteristics. N = 27 teachers served as a control group. It is examined whether the intervention leads to improvements in teaching quality perceived by students. Multilevel regression analyses were conducted. For three of the 14 teaching characteristics, intervention group students (N = 518) rated changes in teaching quality significantly better than control group students (N = 551). The results provide first evidence for the effectiveness of the intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学校领导反馈对学生教学质量感知的影响——一项干预研究的结果
摘要学校领导的反馈往往质量不高,并不总是有效的。由于学校领导在教学领导活动上的时间有限,因此制定了一项干预措施,帮助他们有效地向教师提供高质量的反馈。干预措施的有效性在一项准实验研究中进行了评估。N = 11名学校领导接受了课堂观察和反馈方面的培训。学校领导观察干预组教师(N = 26),并提供了关于14个教学特征的反馈。N = 27名教师作为对照组。研究了干预措施是否能提高学生的教学质量。进行了多水平回归分析。对于14种教学特征中的3种,干预组学生(N = 518)对教学质量变化的评分明显好于对照组学生(N = 551)。研究结果为干预措施的有效性提供了第一个证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
School Effectiveness and School Improvement EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: School Effectiveness and School Improvement presents information on educational effectiveness, practice and policy-making across primary, secondary and higher education. The Editors believe that the educational progress of all students, regardless of family background and economic status, is the key indicator of effectiveness and improvement in schools. The journal strives to explore this idea with manuscripts that cover a range of subjects within the area of educational effectiveness at the classroom, school or system level, including, but not limited to: •Effective pedagogy •Classroom climate •School ethos and leadership •School improvement and reform programmes •Systemwide policy and reform
期刊最新文献
Advancing the field of educational effectiveness and equity School leadership and students’ decisions about further education: exploring the roles of goal setting and school socioeconomic composition Against the odds: predictors of academic success and excellence in majority-minority schools Effects of the comprehensive school reform program Success for All on students’ reading skills in Dutch schools High-quality teachers in low-quality schools: understanding the variation in teaching quality in low-achieving Chilean schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1