The evolution of the United States Climate Change Policies and missed leadership opportunities

María del Pilar Bueno Rubial
{"title":"The evolution of the United States Climate Change Policies and missed leadership opportunities","authors":"María del Pilar Bueno Rubial","doi":"10.5354/0719-3769.2021.58004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this work lies in exposing the evolution and the main features of the US climate policies expressed in its national, subnational, and foreign dimensions that are naturally interwoven. Thus, we assert some of the main features of traditional political approach to climate change include: an emphasis on costs and the impact of measures to address climate change in the American economy and its economic growth; the questioning of climate science as insufficient to justify the costs of the action; the questioning of the differentiation between developed and developing countries as a valid argument for the US to take the lead in international climate action; the resistance to assume mitigation commitments that collide with the principle * Este artículo fue realizado en el contexto de una estancia de investigación en el Georgetown Climate Center, apoyada por el Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de Argentina y la Comisión Fulbright. ** Doctora en Relaciones Internacionales, Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR); Magíster en Sistemas Ambientales Humanos, Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios (CEI), Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR); Especialista en Sistemas de Gestión de Calidad en Medio Ambiente, Centro de Estudios en Relaciones Internacionales de Rosario (CERIR); Bachiller Comercial y Licenciada en Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR). Investigadora del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la Argentina (CONICET). Profesora en varias universidades como la Universidad Nacional de Rosario, la Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos y la Universidad Nacional de La Plata. mbueno@conicet.gov.ar, pilarbuenorubial@gmail.com. ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3408-6271. Recibido: 17 de julio de 2020. Modificaciones: 23 de septiembre de 2020. Aceptado: 25 de septiembre de 2020. Estudios Internacionales 198 (2021) • Universidad de Chile 10 of national sovereignty and fundamental freedoms inherited from the founding fathers and the related tension between the role of States and free market value. We also recognize that political ideology and partisanship continue to play a key role in climate change polices in the US. While political and economic denialism has not been able to immobilize subnational governmental and non-governmental climate initiatives, it has undermined the opportunity and the responsibility of the US to sustain leadership as international projection. This contribution follows a qualitative approach based on the analysis of climate change policies at different scales. It is based mainly on documentary and qualitative data analysis.","PeriodicalId":30847,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Internacionales","volume":"53 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Internacionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-3769.2021.58004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main objective of this work lies in exposing the evolution and the main features of the US climate policies expressed in its national, subnational, and foreign dimensions that are naturally interwoven. Thus, we assert some of the main features of traditional political approach to climate change include: an emphasis on costs and the impact of measures to address climate change in the American economy and its economic growth; the questioning of climate science as insufficient to justify the costs of the action; the questioning of the differentiation between developed and developing countries as a valid argument for the US to take the lead in international climate action; the resistance to assume mitigation commitments that collide with the principle * Este artículo fue realizado en el contexto de una estancia de investigación en el Georgetown Climate Center, apoyada por el Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de Argentina y la Comisión Fulbright. ** Doctora en Relaciones Internacionales, Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR); Magíster en Sistemas Ambientales Humanos, Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios (CEI), Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR); Especialista en Sistemas de Gestión de Calidad en Medio Ambiente, Centro de Estudios en Relaciones Internacionales de Rosario (CERIR); Bachiller Comercial y Licenciada en Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR). Investigadora del Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la Argentina (CONICET). Profesora en varias universidades como la Universidad Nacional de Rosario, la Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos y la Universidad Nacional de La Plata. mbueno@conicet.gov.ar, pilarbuenorubial@gmail.com. ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3408-6271. Recibido: 17 de julio de 2020. Modificaciones: 23 de septiembre de 2020. Aceptado: 25 de septiembre de 2020. Estudios Internacionales 198 (2021) • Universidad de Chile 10 of national sovereignty and fundamental freedoms inherited from the founding fathers and the related tension between the role of States and free market value. We also recognize that political ideology and partisanship continue to play a key role in climate change polices in the US. While political and economic denialism has not been able to immobilize subnational governmental and non-governmental climate initiatives, it has undermined the opportunity and the responsibility of the US to sustain leadership as international projection. This contribution follows a qualitative approach based on the analysis of climate change policies at different scales. It is based mainly on documentary and qualitative data analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国气候变化政策的演变和错失的领导机会
这项工作的主要目标是阐明美国气候政策在其国家、国家以下各级和自然相互交织的外国层面上的演变和主要特点。因此,我们评估了应对气候变化传统政治方法的一些主要特点,包括:强调应对气候变化措施对美国经济及其经济增长的成本和影响;质疑气候科学不足以证明行动的成本;质疑发达国家和发展中国家之间的差异,作为美国在国际气候行动中发挥领导作用的有效理由;抵制承担与原则相冲突的缓解承诺*这篇文章是在阿根廷国家科学技术研究委员会和富布赖特委员会支持的乔治敦气候中心研究期间发表的。**罗萨里奥国立大学政治科学和国际关系学院国际关系博士;罗萨里奥国立大学跨学科研究中心人类环境系统硕士;罗萨里奥国际关系研究中心环境质量管理系统专家;罗萨里奥国立大学商业学士和国际关系学士。阿根廷国家科学技术研究委员会研究员。在罗萨里奥国立大学、恩特雷里奥斯国立大学和拉普拉塔国立大学等多所大学任教。mbueno@conicet.gov.ar-是的,pilarbuenorubial@gmail.com.奥尔西德https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3408-6271.收到:2020年7月17日。修改:2020年9月23日。接受:2020年9月25日。国际研究198(2021年)•智利大学10关于建国之父所继承的国家主权和基本自由以及国家作用与自由市场价值之间的相关紧张关系。我们还认识到,政治意识形态和党派关系继续在美国的气候变化政策中发挥关键作用。虽然政治和经济诋毁主义无法固定国家以下各级政府和非政府气候倡议,但它损害了美国作为国际项目维持领导地位的机会和责任。这一贡献遵循了一种基于对不同规模气候变化政策分析的定性方法。它主要基于文献和定性数据分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
building of Brazilian Party System Guerra Fría, Reforma Agraria y patrimonio agroalimentario: la Empresa Pisquera del Estado (Chile, 1970-1973) inner circle of presidents Confiança na polícia e atitudes políticas autoritárias na América Latina Sustainability in Latin America and the Caribbean
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1