Russia’s Policies in the Post-Soviet Space: Between Constructive Relations and Fighting the New Cold War

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Russian Politics Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI:10.30965/24518921-00604006
A. Kazantsev, S. Lebedev, S. Medvedeva
{"title":"Russia’s Policies in the Post-Soviet Space: Between Constructive Relations and Fighting the New Cold War","authors":"A. Kazantsev, S. Lebedev, S. Medvedeva","doi":"10.30965/24518921-00604006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe article challenges the view that Russia’s goal in the post-Soviet space is to make the region an exclusive zone of Russian influence and keep other world powers out entirely. In fact, Russia has two policies towards the influence of other powers that are active in the region: a ‘business as usual’ approach, applied to China and Turkey; and a securitized ‘New Cold War policy’, applied to the US and West (especially towards their presence in Ukraine). Growing Chinese and Turkish influence has not been ‘securitized’, although the presence of both powers creates clear obstacles to the reintegration of former Soviet countries around Russia. The article draws on three bodies of literature (Realism, Liberalism and Constructivism) to explain this variation. While Moscow perceives growing Western influence in Ukraine as a threat to its domestic regime and identity as a great power and regional leader, it finds common ground with Beijing and Ankara in its concerns about the Western liberal democracy promotion agenda and views both powers as potential allies in the construction of a ‘multipolar world’.","PeriodicalId":37176,"journal":{"name":"Russian Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/24518921-00604006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article challenges the view that Russia’s goal in the post-Soviet space is to make the region an exclusive zone of Russian influence and keep other world powers out entirely. In fact, Russia has two policies towards the influence of other powers that are active in the region: a ‘business as usual’ approach, applied to China and Turkey; and a securitized ‘New Cold War policy’, applied to the US and West (especially towards their presence in Ukraine). Growing Chinese and Turkish influence has not been ‘securitized’, although the presence of both powers creates clear obstacles to the reintegration of former Soviet countries around Russia. The article draws on three bodies of literature (Realism, Liberalism and Constructivism) to explain this variation. While Moscow perceives growing Western influence in Ukraine as a threat to its domestic regime and identity as a great power and regional leader, it finds common ground with Beijing and Ankara in its concerns about the Western liberal democracy promotion agenda and views both powers as potential allies in the construction of a ‘multipolar world’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后苏联时代的俄罗斯政策:在建设性关系与对抗新冷战之间
这篇文章挑战了这样一种观点,即俄罗斯在后苏联时代的目标是使该地区成为俄罗斯影响的专属区,并将其他世界大国完全排除在外。事实上,俄罗斯对活跃在该地区的其他大国的影响有两项政策:对中国和土耳其采取“一切照旧”的做法;以及适用于美国和西方的安全化“新冷战政策”(尤其是针对他们在乌克兰的存在)。中国和土耳其日益增长的影响力并没有被“安全化”,尽管这两个大国的存在为俄罗斯周围的前苏联国家的重新融合制造了明显的障碍。本文从现实主义、自由主义和建构主义三个文学体来解释这种变异。尽管莫斯科认为西方在乌克兰日益增长的影响力是对其国内政权以及大国和地区领导人身份的威胁,但它在对西方自由民主促进议程的担忧上与北京和安卡拉找到了共同点,并将这两个大国视为建设“多极世界”的潜在盟友。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Politics
Russian Politics Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Non-execution of Strasbourg Judgments against Russia: the Case for a Trust Fund Resisting Strasbourg to Reassure Moscow: the Recent Story of the Russian Constitutional Court Pushback or Backlash against the European Court of Human Rights? Authoritarian Sovereignization: Russia’s Way out of the Council of Europe Conservative Jurisprudence and Russia’s Response to ECtHR Judgements on Cases of Domestic Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1