Sport, gender, and national interest during the Olympics: A comparative analysis of media representations in Central and Eastern Europe

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Review for the Sociology of Sport Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI:10.1177/10126902221095686
Dunja Antunovic, Sunčica Bartoluci
{"title":"Sport, gender, and national interest during the Olympics: A comparative analysis of media representations in Central and Eastern Europe","authors":"Dunja Antunovic, Sunčica Bartoluci","doi":"10.1177/10126902221095686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers have documented patterns in sports media coverage across a variety of geographical and media contexts extensively, but relatively few studies focus on the Central and Eastern European region. This study examines the agenda diversity of European public service media in Hungary, Croatia, and Slovenia on their sport-related Facebook accounts during the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games. A content analysis identified featured sports, gender balance, and the role of national interest in the events and athletes represented. Sports agenda diversity was driven by the hegemony of men's football and national success at the Olympics. Gender imbalance in media coverage persists in the region even on public service broadcasters’ social media accounts. Women received coverage only when representing the home nation at an Olympic event. The hegemony of men's football is a transnational phenomenon, while Olympic coverage emphasizes sports that share historical associations with national identity. Sports agenda diversity in the three countries is heterogeneous and regionally distinct. In practice, broadcasters might temporarily minimize gender imbalance in Olympic coverage, but in ways that routinizes the national focus. Theoretical developments in agenda setting in coverage of international events should account both for transnational patterns in public service media in the region and local particularities.","PeriodicalId":47968,"journal":{"name":"International Review for the Sociology of Sport","volume":"58 1","pages":"167 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review for the Sociology of Sport","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902221095686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Researchers have documented patterns in sports media coverage across a variety of geographical and media contexts extensively, but relatively few studies focus on the Central and Eastern European region. This study examines the agenda diversity of European public service media in Hungary, Croatia, and Slovenia on their sport-related Facebook accounts during the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games. A content analysis identified featured sports, gender balance, and the role of national interest in the events and athletes represented. Sports agenda diversity was driven by the hegemony of men's football and national success at the Olympics. Gender imbalance in media coverage persists in the region even on public service broadcasters’ social media accounts. Women received coverage only when representing the home nation at an Olympic event. The hegemony of men's football is a transnational phenomenon, while Olympic coverage emphasizes sports that share historical associations with national identity. Sports agenda diversity in the three countries is heterogeneous and regionally distinct. In practice, broadcasters might temporarily minimize gender imbalance in Olympic coverage, but in ways that routinizes the national focus. Theoretical developments in agenda setting in coverage of international events should account both for transnational patterns in public service media in the region and local particularities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥运会期间的体育、性别和国家利益:中欧和东欧媒体报道的比较分析
研究人员已经广泛地记录了各种地理和媒体背景下体育媒体报道的模式,但相对较少的研究关注中欧和东欧地区。本研究考察了2020年东京奥运会期间,匈牙利、克罗地亚和斯洛文尼亚的欧洲公共服务媒体在其与体育相关的Facebook账户上的议程多样性。一项内容分析确定了特色运动、性别平衡以及国家利益在赛事和所代表运动员中的作用。男子足球的霸权和国家在奥运会上的成功推动了体育议程的多样性。在该地区,甚至在公共服务广播公司的社交媒体账户上,媒体报道的性别失衡仍然存在。女性只有在代表本国参加奥运会时才会得到报道。男子足球的霸权是一种跨国现象,而奥运报道强调的是具有民族认同的历史联系的运动。三国体育议程的多样性具有异质性和地域性。在实践中,广播公司可能会暂时减少奥运会报道中的性别不平衡,但会以常规的方式将全国关注的焦点。制定国际事件报道议程的理论发展应考虑到该区域公共服务媒体的跨国模式和当地特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
13.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The International Review for the Sociology of Sport is a peer reviewed academic journal that is indexed on ISI. Eight issues are now published each year. The main purpose of the IRSS is to disseminate research and scholarship on sport throughout the international academic community. The journal publishes research articles of varying lengths, from standard length research papers to shorter reports and commentary, as well as book and media reviews. The International Review for the Sociology of Sport is not restricted to any theoretical or methodological perspective and brings together contributions from anthropology, cultural studies, geography, gender studies, media studies, history, political economy, semiotics, sociology, as well as interdisciplinary research.
期刊最新文献
Unicorns, rainbows, and unicorn magic: Storying new knowledge of black masculinities within the WWE Young refugees’ experiences of accumulating horizontal and vertical social capital through organised and informal sports The Qatar World Cup and Twitter sentiment: Unraveling the interplay of soft power, public opinion, and media scrutiny Surviving child sexual abuse in women's artistic gymnastics: ‘It's beautiful, because had I stayed in the past, I wouldn’t have evolved as a person’ ‘For those few minutes you are free’: The meaning of sport from imprisoned men's perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1