The evolution in time of the concept of fast growing tree species: is it possible to use a definition applicable to all environmental conditions?

E. Badalamenti, S. Sferlazza, Ds La Mela Veca, F. Maetzke, G. Sala, T. Mantia
{"title":"The evolution in time of the concept of fast growing tree species: is it possible to use a definition applicable to all environmental conditions?","authors":"E. Badalamenti, S. Sferlazza, Ds La Mela Veca, F. Maetzke, G. Sala, T. Mantia","doi":"10.12899/ASR-1967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the expression “fast-growing species” (FGS) referred to tree species has been since long time used, a clear definition has not been adopted for decades. Starting from the Italian historical background, we searched for the definitions of FGS formulated over time at a national and international level. The mean annual increment (MAI) of 10 m 3 ha -1 , identified by the FAO, has been the most commonly considered threshold until recently. Subsequently, experimental activities and research efforts have consistently enhanced the productivity of FGS, and other definitions have been proposed accordingly. Hence, FGS should provide annual wood yields of 15-25 m 3 ha -1 with rotations of less than 25-30 years. In Europe, the maximum MAI can reach about 20-25 m 3 ha -1 , while in fast-growing tropical plantations the MAI frequently exceeds 30-35 m 3 ha -1 . However, we deem that the threshold of 10 m 3 ha -1 year -1 is still reliable for Mediterranean conditions. Since the fast-growing is a relative concept, strongly affected by species’ traits, environmental conditions and cultural practices, a future increase in the productivity levels of wood plantations can be expected.","PeriodicalId":37733,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Silvicultural Research","volume":"45 1","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Silvicultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12899/ASR-1967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although the expression “fast-growing species” (FGS) referred to tree species has been since long time used, a clear definition has not been adopted for decades. Starting from the Italian historical background, we searched for the definitions of FGS formulated over time at a national and international level. The mean annual increment (MAI) of 10 m 3 ha -1 , identified by the FAO, has been the most commonly considered threshold until recently. Subsequently, experimental activities and research efforts have consistently enhanced the productivity of FGS, and other definitions have been proposed accordingly. Hence, FGS should provide annual wood yields of 15-25 m 3 ha -1 with rotations of less than 25-30 years. In Europe, the maximum MAI can reach about 20-25 m 3 ha -1 , while in fast-growing tropical plantations the MAI frequently exceeds 30-35 m 3 ha -1 . However, we deem that the threshold of 10 m 3 ha -1 year -1 is still reliable for Mediterranean conditions. Since the fast-growing is a relative concept, strongly affected by species’ traits, environmental conditions and cultural practices, a future increase in the productivity levels of wood plantations can be expected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速生长树种概念在时间上的演变:是否有可能使用一个适用于所有环境条件的定义?
尽管“速生物种”(FGS)一词用于指代树种已经有很长一段时间了,但几十年来一直没有一个明确的定义。从意大利的历史背景出发,我们搜索了在国家和国际层面上制定的FGS定义。粮农组织确定的年平均增加量(MAI)为10 m 3 ha -1,直到最近才被普遍认为是阈值。随后,实验活动和研究努力不断提高了FGS的生产率,并相应地提出了其他定义。因此,FGS应在轮作少于25-30年的情况下提供15-25立方米3公顷的年木材产量。在欧洲,最大MAI可达20-25平方米3公顷-1,而在快速生长的热带人工林中,MAI经常超过30-35平方米3公顷-1。然而,我们认为10米3公顷-1年-1的阈值对于地中海条件仍然是可靠的。由于速生是一个相对的概念,受物种特征、环境条件和栽培方式的强烈影响,因此可以预期未来人工林的生产力水平会有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Silvicultural Research
Annals of Silvicultural Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of TLS against traditional surveying method for stem taper modelling. A case study in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests of mount Amiata Lessons learned from the past: forestry initiatives for effective carbon stocking in Southern Italy Towards a comprehensive development of eco-innovation indicators in forestry sector: an application in the Italian Alps Gaps and perspectives for the improvement of the sweet chestnut forest-wood chain in Italy The diversity of termite species on natural forest and agroforestry land in Sulawesi tropical forests in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1