Positive education in daily teaching, the promotion of wellbeing, and engagement in a whole school approach: a clustered quasi-experimental trial

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Effectiveness and School Improvement Pub Date : 2021-11-10 DOI:10.1080/09243453.2021.1988989
Jochem M. Goldberg, Marion Sommers-Spijkerman, A. Clarke, K. Schreurs, E. Bohlmeijer
{"title":"Positive education in daily teaching, the promotion of wellbeing, and engagement in a whole school approach: a clustered quasi-experimental trial","authors":"Jochem M. Goldberg, Marion Sommers-Spijkerman, A. Clarke, K. Schreurs, E. Bohlmeijer","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2021.1988989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the current study, a Dutch whole school Positive Education Programme (PEP) was investigated. PEP is a bottom-up programme, aimed at shifting teacher’s attention from solely focusing on learning outcomes towards a more comprehensive approach that takes the wellbeing and engagement of students during classes into account. PEP was investigated through a clustered quasi-experimental trial. Four primary schools, 639 pupils, were included, of which two were allocated to PEP. Multilevel analyses showed no significant differences on any of the outcomes. However, the data indicated a trend towards more engagement in the intervention schools (p = .09). Also, at post-measurement, the proportion of sufficiently engaged students was significantly higher in the intervention schools. Although it seems too premature to draw conclusions regarding the effectiveness of such a whole school approach, the findings on engagement are promising and have the potential to engender a wide range of other beneficial outcomes.","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":"33 1","pages":"148 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1988989","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the current study, a Dutch whole school Positive Education Programme (PEP) was investigated. PEP is a bottom-up programme, aimed at shifting teacher’s attention from solely focusing on learning outcomes towards a more comprehensive approach that takes the wellbeing and engagement of students during classes into account. PEP was investigated through a clustered quasi-experimental trial. Four primary schools, 639 pupils, were included, of which two were allocated to PEP. Multilevel analyses showed no significant differences on any of the outcomes. However, the data indicated a trend towards more engagement in the intervention schools (p = .09). Also, at post-measurement, the proportion of sufficiently engaged students was significantly higher in the intervention schools. Although it seems too premature to draw conclusions regarding the effectiveness of such a whole school approach, the findings on engagement are promising and have the potential to engender a wide range of other beneficial outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日常教学中的积极教育,促进福祉,并参与整个学校的方法:一个聚集的准实验试验
摘要本研究以荷兰全校积极教育计划(PEP)为研究对象。PEP是一个自下而上的项目,旨在将教师的注意力从仅仅关注学习成果转向更全面的方法,考虑到学生在课堂上的健康和参与。PEP通过聚类准实验试验进行调查。包括四所小学,639名学生,其中两所被分配给人发计划。多水平分析显示在任何结果上没有显著差异。然而,数据显示在干预学校中有更多参与的趋势(p = .09)。此外,在测量后,充分参与的学生比例显著高于干预学校。虽然现在就这种全校模式的有效性得出结论似乎还为时过早,但关于参与的研究结果是有希望的,并且有可能产生广泛的其他有益结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
School Effectiveness and School Improvement EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: School Effectiveness and School Improvement presents information on educational effectiveness, practice and policy-making across primary, secondary and higher education. The Editors believe that the educational progress of all students, regardless of family background and economic status, is the key indicator of effectiveness and improvement in schools. The journal strives to explore this idea with manuscripts that cover a range of subjects within the area of educational effectiveness at the classroom, school or system level, including, but not limited to: •Effective pedagogy •Classroom climate •School ethos and leadership •School improvement and reform programmes •Systemwide policy and reform
期刊最新文献
Advancing the field of educational effectiveness and equity School leadership and students’ decisions about further education: exploring the roles of goal setting and school socioeconomic composition Against the odds: predictors of academic success and excellence in majority-minority schools Effects of the comprehensive school reform program Success for All on students’ reading skills in Dutch schools High-quality teachers in low-quality schools: understanding the variation in teaching quality in low-achieving Chilean schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1