The Cyclops’ Revenge

Q1 Arts and Humanities Greek and Roman Musical Studies Pub Date : 2019-03-21 DOI:10.1163/22129758-12341334
Francesca Modini
{"title":"The Cyclops’ Revenge","authors":"Francesca Modini","doi":"10.1163/22129758-12341334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nTaking issue with the Gorgias and its dismissal of fifth-century Athenian rhetoricians and statesmen, in his Reply to Plato in Defence of the Four (Or. 3) the imperial sophist Aelius Aristides finds himself dealing with Plato’s condemnation of New Music, which in the Gorgias had gone hand in hand with the censure of rhetoric. In a brilliant display of new musical ‘revisionism’ so far ignored by scholars, Aristides presents in a positive light the notorious new dithyrambist Philoxenus of Cythera, so that Plato’s influential criticism of New Music, and especially of its political implications, backfires. This paper provides a close analysis of Aristides’ new musical discussion, concentrating both on the sophist’s engagement with Platonic musical critique and on his use of anecdotal traditions about Philoxenus circulating under the Empire. The ultimate goal is to contribute to the history of New Music and its ancient, not always predictable, reception.","PeriodicalId":36585,"journal":{"name":"Greek and Roman Musical Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22129758-12341334","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greek and Roman Musical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22129758-12341334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taking issue with the Gorgias and its dismissal of fifth-century Athenian rhetoricians and statesmen, in his Reply to Plato in Defence of the Four (Or. 3) the imperial sophist Aelius Aristides finds himself dealing with Plato’s condemnation of New Music, which in the Gorgias had gone hand in hand with the censure of rhetoric. In a brilliant display of new musical ‘revisionism’ so far ignored by scholars, Aristides presents in a positive light the notorious new dithyrambist Philoxenus of Cythera, so that Plato’s influential criticism of New Music, and especially of its political implications, backfires. This paper provides a close analysis of Aristides’ new musical discussion, concentrating both on the sophist’s engagement with Platonic musical critique and on his use of anecdotal traditions about Philoxenus circulating under the Empire. The ultimate goal is to contribute to the history of New Music and its ancient, not always predictable, reception.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独眼巨人的复仇
帝国诡辩家阿留斯·阿里斯蒂德(Aelius Aristides)在《为四人辩护》(Or.3)中对高尔基亚及其对五世纪雅典修辞学家和政治家的否定表示异议,他发现自己正在处理柏拉图对新音乐的谴责,在高尔基亚时代,新音乐与对修辞的谴责齐头并进。阿里斯蒂德对迄今为止被学者们忽视的新音乐“修正主义”进行了精彩的展示,他以积极的眼光展现了臭名昭著的新迪思兰主义者Cythera的Philoxenus,因此柏拉图对新音乐的有影响力的批评,尤其是对其政治含义的批评,适得其反。本文对阿里斯蒂德的新音乐讨论进行了深入分析,重点关注这位智者对柏拉图音乐批评的参与,以及他对帝国统治下流传的关于菲洛西诺斯的轶事传统的使用。最终目标是为新音乐的历史及其古老而不总是可预测的接受做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Greek and Roman Musical Studies
Greek and Roman Musical Studies Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Greek and Latin Texts on the Harp and Similar Instruments in Byzantine Times Echoing the Eleusinian World: Eleusinian Topoi and Sounds in Pindaric Epinician Poetry Pompē, Peplos, Poikilia: Picturing the Panathenaia on an Athenian Amphora Aspects of Roman Dance Culture. Religious Cults, Theatrical Entertainments, Metaphorical Appropriations, edited by Schlapbach, K. Texts, Bodies, Images, Movement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1