Usefulness of Administrative Data in Assessing the Service Quality and Technical Efficiency of Social Care Centres

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES Journal of Social Policy Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-29 DOI:10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-4-645-658
Эдгарс Шталс, Жанна Цауркубуле, Рита Константе
{"title":"Usefulness of Administrative Data in Assessing the Service Quality and Technical Efficiency of Social Care Centres","authors":"Эдгарс Шталс, Жанна Цауркубуле, Рита Константе","doi":"10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-4-645-658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Latvia, like other countries worldwide, faces the challenges of an ageing society, with an increasing proportion of elderly population group and the demand for long-term social care services at local level. The Latvian Social Protection and Labour Market Policy Guidelines for 2021–2027 include actions on the improvement of the quality monitoring and efficiency assessment system of social services. In this article, the authors evaluate the quality of 67 social care centres (SCC) in the period from 2011 to 2017, and technical efficiency (TE) of 64 SCCs in 2017 by using publicly available administrative data of SCCs. The aim of the work is to find out whether administrative data can be used in the evaluation of the quality of care at SCC and TE of SCC. The authors conclude that the analysis of administrative data does not allow one to determine the quality of SCC because administrative data do not contain predictors of the care process. The administrative data of SCC can be used in the evaluation of TE of SCC, where, depending on the applied method, set goals, and objectives, the obtained results can be used to determine the effectiveness of local government SCCs and to improve economic activity. Based on the content of the work, the authors point out the need to introduce unified quality indicators (QI) of the care process at SCCs of Latvia. This would ensure opportunities for control of the quality of care at SCCs, transparency of the care process, and quality assessment. In addition, QI can be used as a component in evaluating the efficiency of SCCs. The authors acknowledge that further research related to the assessment of SCC quality and efficiency in Latvia is needed.","PeriodicalId":43784,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Policy Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-4-645-658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Latvia, like other countries worldwide, faces the challenges of an ageing society, with an increasing proportion of elderly population group and the demand for long-term social care services at local level. The Latvian Social Protection and Labour Market Policy Guidelines for 2021–2027 include actions on the improvement of the quality monitoring and efficiency assessment system of social services. In this article, the authors evaluate the quality of 67 social care centres (SCC) in the period from 2011 to 2017, and technical efficiency (TE) of 64 SCCs in 2017 by using publicly available administrative data of SCCs. The aim of the work is to find out whether administrative data can be used in the evaluation of the quality of care at SCC and TE of SCC. The authors conclude that the analysis of administrative data does not allow one to determine the quality of SCC because administrative data do not contain predictors of the care process. The administrative data of SCC can be used in the evaluation of TE of SCC, where, depending on the applied method, set goals, and objectives, the obtained results can be used to determine the effectiveness of local government SCCs and to improve economic activity. Based on the content of the work, the authors point out the need to introduce unified quality indicators (QI) of the care process at SCCs of Latvia. This would ensure opportunities for control of the quality of care at SCCs, transparency of the care process, and quality assessment. In addition, QI can be used as a component in evaluating the efficiency of SCCs. The authors acknowledge that further research related to the assessment of SCC quality and efficiency in Latvia is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行政数据在评估社会照顾中心服务质素和技术效率方面的作用
拉脱维亚与世界其他国家一样,面临着老龄化社会的挑战,老年人口比例不断增加,地方一级对长期社会护理服务的需求也在增加。《拉脱维亚2021-2027年社会保护和劳动力市场政策指南》包括改进社会服务质量监测和效率评估系统的行动。在本文中,作者使用公开的社会护理中心行政数据,评估了2011年至2017年期间67个社会护理中心的质量,以及2017年64个社会护理服务中心的技术效率。这项工作的目的是了解行政数据是否可以用于评估SCC和SCC TE的护理质量。作者得出结论,对管理数据的分析不允许确定SCC的质量,因为管理数据不包含护理过程的预测因素。SCC的行政数据可用于SCC的TE评估,其中,根据应用的方法、设定的目标和目的,所获得的结果可用于确定地方政府SCC的有效性和改善经济活动。根据工作内容,作者指出有必要引入拉脱维亚SCC护理过程的统一质量指标(QI)。这将确保有机会控制SCC的护理质量、护理过程的透明度和质量评估。此外,QI可作为评估SCC效率的一个组成部分。作者承认,需要对拉脱维亚SCC质量和效率的评估进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Policy Studies provides a forum for scholarly discussion of different aspects of social policy in Russia and abroad. By placing at the center of its analysis the issues of contemporary social, economic, political and cultural transformations societies in transition as well as the reasons and consequences of such changes, the Journal integrates a wide range of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Жилищное обеспечение детей-­сирот: проблемы социальной поддержки и ресурсные возможности «Между виртуальным и физическим»: контуры цифрового активизма экологических некоммерческих организаций России Конструирование образа российского рабочего в событиях Worldskills Russia Трансформация социальных государств в постсоветских странах: научная дискуссия и исследовательская повестка Управление пространством в московских парках как конструирование биополитической и биокультурной идентичности
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1