Prosody and ideology

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum Pub Date : 2021-10-15 DOI:10.1075/langct.20006.luk
Annabelle Lukin, L. I. Rivas
{"title":"Prosody and ideology","authors":"Annabelle Lukin, L. I. Rivas","doi":"10.1075/langct.20006.luk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The focus of this paper is on the role choices in phonological systems (Brazil\n 1997; Halliday & Greaves 2008) play in the ideological work of a text.\n Using an instance of news reporting of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, we show how prosodic choices – both those shared with other\n texts in this register, and those specific to this instance – contribute to the ideological force of the text. The ideological\n effects of prosodic choices in this text, we argue, include projecting a very particular interpretation of the invasion as if\n distant and objective, and giving prominence to claims that the invasion was measured and targeted, and by implication in\n accordance with international law.","PeriodicalId":29846,"journal":{"name":"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.20006.luk","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on the role choices in phonological systems (Brazil 1997; Halliday & Greaves 2008) play in the ideological work of a text. Using an instance of news reporting of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, we show how prosodic choices – both those shared with other texts in this register, and those specific to this instance – contribute to the ideological force of the text. The ideological effects of prosodic choices in this text, we argue, include projecting a very particular interpretation of the invasion as if distant and objective, and giving prominence to claims that the invasion was measured and targeted, and by implication in accordance with international law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韵律和意识形态
本文的重点是语音系统中的角色选择(巴西,1997;Halliday&Greaves,2008)在文本意识形态工作中的作用。以2003年入侵伊拉克的新闻报道为例,我们展示了韵律选择——既有与本登记册中其他文本共享的,也有与本实例相关的——如何对文本的意识形态力量做出贡献。我们认为,本文中韵律选择的意识形态影响包括对入侵做出一种非常特殊的解释,仿佛是遥远而客观的,并强调入侵是根据国际法衡量和针对性的,并通过暗示的方式进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Review of Harris (2021): The linguistics wars: Chomsky, Lakoff, and the battle over deep structure Graduating points of view in Spanish written language A comparative study of nominal group systems and structures between Lhasa Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese The diachronic analysis of resultative constructions Structure markers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1