{"title":"Novos arranjos em psiquiatria da infância e adolescência no Brasil do século XXI: a prevenção e o controle de risco em foco","authors":"Letícia Hummel do Amaral","doi":"10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E74912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the emergence and dissemination of specialized knowledge in developmental psychiatry for childhood and adolescence in Brazil were discussed. A bibliographic and documentary investigation was carried out – in which I highlight an analysis of the reports (INPD, 2018, 2019) describing its researches and activities – and through which it was possible to observe that these new arrangements in psychiatry arise from of its approach to neurosciences in the last decades, and configure a theoretical model whose foundations are based on explanations about brain development. By establishing a research agenda with children and teenagers, recruited directly from some selected schools, specialists in developmental psychiatry aim to identify, at an earlier age, individuals at risk of developing mental disorders and, thus, create diagnostic andtherapeutic technologies that work in the scope of prevention. The analysis of the initiatives carried out by this group of psychiatrists – researchers at the University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP),Federal University of Sao Paulo (USP) and Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) – over the past decade allows us to state that the legitimation and diffusion of this new psychiatry’sparadigm in society contributes strongly to the expansion of the medicalization of childhood andof the school space within the country","PeriodicalId":47847,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2020.E74912","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, the emergence and dissemination of specialized knowledge in developmental psychiatry for childhood and adolescence in Brazil were discussed. A bibliographic and documentary investigation was carried out – in which I highlight an analysis of the reports (INPD, 2018, 2019) describing its researches and activities – and through which it was possible to observe that these new arrangements in psychiatry arise from of its approach to neurosciences in the last decades, and configure a theoretical model whose foundations are based on explanations about brain development. By establishing a research agenda with children and teenagers, recruited directly from some selected schools, specialists in developmental psychiatry aim to identify, at an earlier age, individuals at risk of developing mental disorders and, thus, create diagnostic andtherapeutic technologies that work in the scope of prevention. The analysis of the initiatives carried out by this group of psychiatrists – researchers at the University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP),Federal University of Sao Paulo (USP) and Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) – over the past decade allows us to state that the legitimation and diffusion of this new psychiatry’sparadigm in society contributes strongly to the expansion of the medicalization of childhood andof the school space within the country
期刊介绍:
Politics & Society is a peer-reviewed journal. All submitted papers are read by a rotating editorial board member. If a paper is deemed potentially publishable, it is sent to another board member, who, if agreeing that it is potentially publishable, sends it to a third board member. If and only if all three agree, the paper is sent to the entire editorial board for consideration at board meetings. The editorial board meets three times a year, and the board members who are present (usually between 9 and 14) make decisions through a deliberative process that also considers written reports from absent members. Unlike many journals which rely on 1–3 individual blind referee reports and a single editor with final say, the peers who decide whether to accept submitted work are thus the full editorial board of the journal, comprised of scholars from various disciplines, who discuss papers openly, with author names known, at meetings. Editors are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest when evaluating manuscripts and to recuse themselves from voting if such a potential exists.