Scaffolding adolescents’ critical thinking and disciplinary literacy skills in an in-person and virtual humanities class

Q3 Social Sciences Middle School Journal Pub Date : 2021-08-08 DOI:10.1080/00940771.2021.1948300
Pamela Brunskill, John Z. Strong
{"title":"Scaffolding adolescents’ critical thinking and disciplinary literacy skills in an in-person and virtual humanities class","authors":"Pamela Brunskill, John Z. Strong","doi":"10.1080/00940771.2021.1948300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Critical thinking is one of the most highly sought skills in education, yet questions remain about instilling students with this elusive set of skills and dispositions. Is it generalizable or discipline-specific? How should it be taught? This article describes an approach by two middle school teachers who developed and taught an in-person and virtual humanities curriculum. They utilized an instructional routine involving discussion and writing to help students comprehend and think critically about challenging, disciplinary texts. Opportunities for discussion and writing before, during, and after reading allowed for scaffolded, deeper understandings of the texts.","PeriodicalId":37061,"journal":{"name":"Middle School Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"13 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle School Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2021.1948300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Critical thinking is one of the most highly sought skills in education, yet questions remain about instilling students with this elusive set of skills and dispositions. Is it generalizable or discipline-specific? How should it be taught? This article describes an approach by two middle school teachers who developed and taught an in-person and virtual humanities curriculum. They utilized an instructional routine involving discussion and writing to help students comprehend and think critically about challenging, disciplinary texts. Opportunities for discussion and writing before, during, and after reading allowed for scaffolded, deeper understandings of the texts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脚手架青少年的批判性思维和学科素养技能在一个面对面和虚拟人文类
批判性思维是教育中最受欢迎的技能之一,然而,如何向学生灌输这种难以捉摸的技能和性格,问题仍然存在。它是一般化的还是特定学科的?应该怎么教呢?本文描述了两位中学教师开发和教授面对面和虚拟人文学科课程的方法。他们采用了包括讨论和写作在内的教学常规,以帮助学生理解和批判性地思考具有挑战性的学科文本。在阅读前、阅读中、阅读后都有讨论和写作的机会,可以让学生对文章有更深入的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Middle School Journal
Middle School Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Integrating mental health literacy in the English language arts middle school classroom A crosswalk of digital storytelling and multilingual learning Authoring pandemic personal narratives: Middle level students’ representations of life during the 2020-21 school year Toward a culturally sustaining science of reading On the need for middle level advocacy: A district administrator responds to AMLE’s National Policy Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1