Airline Disruption Management: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Perspective in an Operational Control Centre

IF 2.2 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1177/15553434211061024
Lucas Bertelli Fogaça, Éder Henriqson, Guido Carim Junior, Felipe Lando
{"title":"Airline Disruption Management: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Perspective in an Operational Control Centre","authors":"Lucas Bertelli Fogaça, Éder Henriqson, Guido Carim Junior, Felipe Lando","doi":"10.1177/15553434211061024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Operations Control Centres (OCCs) are critical structures used by airlines to oversee the execution of all planned flights, managing punctuality, regularity and customer support. In this study, we investigated the decision-making during flight disruptions inside an OCC from the naturalistic decision-making perspective. We conducted a mini-ethnography case study in a major South American airline, focussing on how functions critical to the flight disruption management cope with variability. Data collection included document analyses, field notes, direct observations and interviews. The functional description of work-as-done revealed how the OCC constantly and actively looks for signs of disruption while monitoring the normal operation and rebalancing resources. The decision-making process is distributed and decentralised across multiple functions, where experts from each function rely on a repertoire of strategies to deploy innovative solutions to dynamic scenarios. Five different mechanisms were identified that converge functions to disarm potential disruptions before they compromise the flight network, and continuously create and reinforce system buffers.","PeriodicalId":46342,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","volume":"16 1","pages":"3 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434211061024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Operations Control Centres (OCCs) are critical structures used by airlines to oversee the execution of all planned flights, managing punctuality, regularity and customer support. In this study, we investigated the decision-making during flight disruptions inside an OCC from the naturalistic decision-making perspective. We conducted a mini-ethnography case study in a major South American airline, focussing on how functions critical to the flight disruption management cope with variability. Data collection included document analyses, field notes, direct observations and interviews. The functional description of work-as-done revealed how the OCC constantly and actively looks for signs of disruption while monitoring the normal operation and rebalancing resources. The decision-making process is distributed and decentralised across multiple functions, where experts from each function rely on a repertoire of strategies to deploy innovative solutions to dynamic scenarios. Five different mechanisms were identified that converge functions to disarm potential disruptions before they compromise the flight network, and continuously create and reinforce system buffers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
航空公司干扰管理:运营控制中心的自然主义决策视角
运营控制中心是航空公司用来监督所有计划航班执行、管理准点率、规律性和客户支持的关键结构。在这项研究中,我们从自然主义决策的角度调查了OCC内航班中断期间的决策。我们在南美一家主要航空公司进行了一项小型民族志案例研究,重点关注对航班中断管理至关重要的功能如何应对可变性。数据收集包括文件分析、实地考察、直接观察和访谈。对已完成工作的功能描述揭示了OCC如何在监测正常运营和资源再平衡的同时,不断积极地寻找中断迹象。决策过程分布在多个职能部门,每个职能部门的专家都依赖于一系列战略,为动态场景部署创新解决方案。确定了五种不同的机制,它们汇集了功能,在潜在干扰危及飞行网络之前解除干扰,并不断创建和加强系统缓冲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Is the Pull-Down Effect Overstated? An Examination of Trust Propagation Among Fighter Pilots in a High-Fidelity Simulation A Taxonomy for AI Hazard Analysis Understanding Automation Failure Integrating Function Allocation and Operational Event Sequence Diagrams to Support Human-Robot Coordination: Case Study of a Robotic Date Thinning System Adapting Cognitive Task Analysis Methods for Use in a Large Sample Simulation Study of High-Risk Healthcare Events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1