Reduction in household food waste through an information strategy: Findings from consumers in Australia

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104982
Ana Gimenez , Gastón Ares , Sok L. Chheang , Sara R. Jaeger
{"title":"Reduction in household food waste through an information strategy: Findings from consumers in Australia","authors":"Ana Gimenez ,&nbsp;Gastón Ares ,&nbsp;Sok L. Chheang ,&nbsp;Sara R. Jaeger","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food waste is an issue of global concern. Particularly troublesome is the amount of waste at the consumer level, and a need exists for interventions that draw on a deeper understanding of the underlying factors leading to food waste. The research aims were to (1) study the potential of an information-based strategy to reduce household food waste, (2) explore the impact of information on attitudes towards food waste, and (3) explore the reasons underlying perceived changes in household food waste. A controlled randomized trial was conducted, and participants were assigned to one of two groups (Informed, Control) with data collection at two time points (Baseline, Time 2). At both time points, all participants completed a standardized quantitative survey on food disposal in the past 7 days. At baseline, after the food disposal survey was completed, participants in the informed group read a text about food waste and completed a highlighting task. The key result was a significant reduction in household food waste approximately fifteen days after the Baseline, which was found for both experimental groups, albeit slightly larger in the Informed group. This was found despite the Control group having the same attitudes, on average, to engaging in food waste reduction behaviors. To successfully reduce food waste, participants bought less food, used leftover and suboptimal foods, reduced portion size, checked stored foods to use them before expiration, and planned meals. The main reason for not reducing food waste was related to the belief that household food waste was minimal or inexistent. Overall, the research further stresses the potential of information strategies to achieve food waste reductions at the household level and discusses cognitive dissonance as a possible underlying mechanism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 104982"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329323001763","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food waste is an issue of global concern. Particularly troublesome is the amount of waste at the consumer level, and a need exists for interventions that draw on a deeper understanding of the underlying factors leading to food waste. The research aims were to (1) study the potential of an information-based strategy to reduce household food waste, (2) explore the impact of information on attitudes towards food waste, and (3) explore the reasons underlying perceived changes in household food waste. A controlled randomized trial was conducted, and participants were assigned to one of two groups (Informed, Control) with data collection at two time points (Baseline, Time 2). At both time points, all participants completed a standardized quantitative survey on food disposal in the past 7 days. At baseline, after the food disposal survey was completed, participants in the informed group read a text about food waste and completed a highlighting task. The key result was a significant reduction in household food waste approximately fifteen days after the Baseline, which was found for both experimental groups, albeit slightly larger in the Informed group. This was found despite the Control group having the same attitudes, on average, to engaging in food waste reduction behaviors. To successfully reduce food waste, participants bought less food, used leftover and suboptimal foods, reduced portion size, checked stored foods to use them before expiration, and planned meals. The main reason for not reducing food waste was related to the belief that household food waste was minimal or inexistent. Overall, the research further stresses the potential of information strategies to achieve food waste reductions at the household level and discusses cognitive dissonance as a possible underlying mechanism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过信息战略减少家庭食物浪费:来自澳大利亚消费者的调查结果
食物浪费是一个全球关注的问题。尤其麻烦的是消费者层面的浪费数量,需要采取干预措施,对导致食物浪费的潜在因素有更深入的了解。本研究的目的是:(1)研究信息化策略在减少家庭食物浪费方面的潜力;(2)探讨信息对对待食物浪费态度的影响;(3)探讨家庭食物浪费感知变化的原因。进行对照随机试验,将参与者分为两组(知情组,对照组),在两个时间点(基线,时间2)收集数据。在两个时间点,所有参与者都完成了过去7天内食物处理的标准化定量调查。在食物处理调查完成后,被告知的一组参与者阅读了一篇关于食物浪费的文章,并完成了一项突出显示的任务。关键的结果是,在基线后大约15天,家庭食物浪费显著减少,这在两个实验组中都有发现,尽管在知情组中略有增加。尽管对照组在参与减少食物浪费行为方面的平均态度相同,但还是发现了这一点。为了成功地减少食物浪费,参与者减少购买食物,使用剩余的和不理想的食物,减少份量,检查储存的食物在过期前使用,并计划膳食。不减少食物浪费的主要原因是认为家庭食物浪费很少或根本不存在。总体而言,该研究进一步强调了信息策略在家庭层面实现食物浪费减少的潜力,并讨论了认知失调作为可能的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Brewing emotions: Hedonic evaluation, sustainability narratives, and purchase intentions in craft beer The interaction between mood, dietary restraint, and emotion regulation on snack food choice and consumption: A naturalistic food diary study Taste the joy: How multisensory simulation enhances young adults' hedonic expectations for healthy foods Editorial Board Trust pathways: The key to unlocking health and sustainability perceptions in food choices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1