Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Global Retreat of Democracy: A Curated Discussion

IF 4.1 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Management Inquiry Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.1177/10564926221119395
P. Adler, Amr Adly, D. Armanios, J. Battilana, Zlatko Bodrožić, S. Clegg, G. Davis, Claudine Gartenberg, Maryann Glynn, Ali Aslan Gümüsay, Heather A. Haveman, P. Leonardi, M. Lounsbury, A. McGahan, Renate E. Meyer, N. Phillips, Kara Sheppard-Jones
{"title":"Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Global Retreat of Democracy: A Curated Discussion","authors":"P. Adler, Amr Adly, D. Armanios, J. Battilana, Zlatko Bodrožić, S. Clegg, G. Davis, Claudine Gartenberg, Maryann Glynn, Ali Aslan Gümüsay, Heather A. Haveman, P. Leonardi, M. Lounsbury, A. McGahan, Renate E. Meyer, N. Phillips, Kara Sheppard-Jones","doi":"10.1177/10564926221119395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To the surprise of many in the West, the fall of the USSR in 1991 did not lead to the adoption of liberal democratic government around the world and the much anticipated “end of history.” In fact, authoritarianism has made a comeback, and liberal democracy has been on the retreat for at least the last 15 years culminating in the unthinkable: the invasion of a democratic European country by an authoritarian regime. But why does authoritarianism continue to spread, not only as an alternative to liberal democracy, but also within many liberal democracies where authoritarian leaders continue to gain strength and popularity? In this curated piece, contributors discuss some of the potential contributions of management scholarship to understanding authoritarianism, as well as highlight a number of directions for management research in this area.","PeriodicalId":47877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Inquiry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926221119395","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

To the surprise of many in the West, the fall of the USSR in 1991 did not lead to the adoption of liberal democratic government around the world and the much anticipated “end of history.” In fact, authoritarianism has made a comeback, and liberal democracy has been on the retreat for at least the last 15 years culminating in the unthinkable: the invasion of a democratic European country by an authoritarian regime. But why does authoritarianism continue to spread, not only as an alternative to liberal democracy, but also within many liberal democracies where authoritarian leaders continue to gain strength and popularity? In this curated piece, contributors discuss some of the potential contributions of management scholarship to understanding authoritarianism, as well as highlight a number of directions for management research in this area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
威权主义,民粹主义和民主的全球撤退:策划讨论
令许多西方人吃惊的是,1991年苏联的解体并没有导致世界各地采用自由民主政府,也没有导致人们期待已久的“历史的终结”。事实上,威权主义卷土重来,而自由民主至少在过去15年里一直在退步,最终导致了一件不可想象的事情:一个威权政权入侵了一个民主的欧洲国家。但是,为什么威权主义不仅作为自由民主的替代品,而且在许多威权主义领导人继续获得力量和声望的自由民主国家中继续蔓延?在这篇精心策划的文章中,作者讨论了管理学术对理解威权主义的一些潜在贡献,并强调了该领域管理研究的一些方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management Inquiry, sponsored by the Western Academy of Management, is a refereed journal for scholars and professionals in management, organizational behavior, strategy, and human resources. Its intent is to explore ideas and build knowledge in management theory and practice, with a focus on creative, nontraditional research as well as key controversies in the field. The journal seeks to maintain a constructive balance between innovation and quality, and at the same time widely define the forms that relevant contributions to the field can take. JMI features six sections: Meet the Person, Provocations, Reflections on Experience, Nontraditional Research, Essays, and Dialog.
期刊最新文献
Managing Social Impact Bonds: Intermediary Work and Designing Institutional Infrastructure Wake up! Advancing the Conversation on Woke Labeling Psychedelics, Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy and Employees’ Wellbeing A Revisionist History Approach to the Study of Emotional Labor: Have We Forgotten Display Rules and Service Contexts? Back to the Future: What We’d Change in “Social Identity Theory and the Organization” (Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14, 20–39)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1