{"title":"On the L1-acquisition of the pragmatics of discourse like","authors":"M. Schweinberger","doi":"10.1075/fol.20025.sch","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study analyzes the L1-acquisition of discourse like and its pragmatic functions in American\n English based on the Home-School Study of Language and Literacy Development component of the Child\n Language Data Exchange System (CHILDES). The data show that discourse like is already present in the\n speech of 3- and 4-year-old children and that even very young children employ like to perform distinct pragmatic\n functions with specifying uses being dominant until age 8;5. The analysis also shows a notable increase in discourse\n like as children mature, mainly driven by an increase in attention-directing like, the\n dominant function of discourse like among children older than 8;5. Conditional inference trees show that the use\n of discourse like by children is affected by a child’s age, the situation type and the frequency of discourse\n like in caregivers’ input. Children younger than 7;10 use discourse like only rarely in\n formal contexts as well as in informal contexts if their caregivers do not use discourse like frequently.\n However, children use discourse like substantially more if they are older than 7;10 or, in informal contexts,\n when their caregivers use discourse like frequently. The changes in frequency and the functional shifts in the\n use of like around the ages of 7 to 9 is interpreted to show that peers become more important as linguistic role\n models when children enter school. The results thus substantiate research which suggests that the pragmatic and social meanings of\n discourse markers are learned alongside linguistic constraints rather than after the form has been acquired.","PeriodicalId":44232,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functions of Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20025.sch","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study analyzes the L1-acquisition of discourse like and its pragmatic functions in American
English based on the Home-School Study of Language and Literacy Development component of the Child
Language Data Exchange System (CHILDES). The data show that discourse like is already present in the
speech of 3- and 4-year-old children and that even very young children employ like to perform distinct pragmatic
functions with specifying uses being dominant until age 8;5. The analysis also shows a notable increase in discourse
like as children mature, mainly driven by an increase in attention-directing like, the
dominant function of discourse like among children older than 8;5. Conditional inference trees show that the use
of discourse like by children is affected by a child’s age, the situation type and the frequency of discourse
like in caregivers’ input. Children younger than 7;10 use discourse like only rarely in
formal contexts as well as in informal contexts if their caregivers do not use discourse like frequently.
However, children use discourse like substantially more if they are older than 7;10 or, in informal contexts,
when their caregivers use discourse like frequently. The changes in frequency and the functional shifts in the
use of like around the ages of 7 to 9 is interpreted to show that peers become more important as linguistic role
models when children enter school. The results thus substantiate research which suggests that the pragmatic and social meanings of
discourse markers are learned alongside linguistic constraints rather than after the form has been acquired.
期刊介绍:
Functions of Language is an international journal of linguistics which explores the functionalist perspective on the organisation and use of natural language. It encourages the interplay of theory and description, and provides space for the detailed analysis, qualitative or quantitative, of linguistic data from a broad range of languages. Its scope is broad, covering such matters as prosodic phenomena in phonology, the clause in its communicative context, and regularities of pragmatics, conversation and discourse, as well as the interaction between the various levels of analysis. The overall purpose is to contribute to our understanding of how the use of languages in speech and writing has impacted, and continues to impact, upon the structure of those languages.