The “Majestic Equality” of the Law: Conservatism, Radicalism, and Reform of the Civil Courts in Upper Canada, 1841-1853

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL Pub Date : 2021-01-14 DOI:10.60082/2817-5069.3582
William N. T. Wylie
{"title":"The “Majestic Equality” of the Law: Conservatism, Radicalism, and Reform of the Civil Courts in Upper Canada, 1841-1853","authors":"William N. T. Wylie","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mid-nineteenth century was an age of reform in the civil courts of the common-law world. Why, in spite of the clamour for change within Upper Canada and the introduction of reforms in adjacent common-law jurisdictions, were Upper Canada’s leading lawyers and politicians so reluctant to act? The answer is found in the conservatism of the province’s leaders, which stemmed not only from the legal training of the lawyers, but also from the moderate conservative ideology of the Upper Canadian leadership as a whole. At an almost unprecedented time of public debate, when resentment to lawyers and the courts was being expressed and a radical critique of the courts and the profession was emerging, Upper Canada’s most influential residents managed to maintain political control and steadfastly refused to act in advance of the mother country. This article is available in Osgoode Hall Law Journal: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol57/iss2/3","PeriodicalId":45757,"journal":{"name":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.3582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mid-nineteenth century was an age of reform in the civil courts of the common-law world. Why, in spite of the clamour for change within Upper Canada and the introduction of reforms in adjacent common-law jurisdictions, were Upper Canada’s leading lawyers and politicians so reluctant to act? The answer is found in the conservatism of the province’s leaders, which stemmed not only from the legal training of the lawyers, but also from the moderate conservative ideology of the Upper Canadian leadership as a whole. At an almost unprecedented time of public debate, when resentment to lawyers and the courts was being expressed and a radical critique of the courts and the profession was emerging, Upper Canada’s most influential residents managed to maintain political control and steadfastly refused to act in advance of the mother country. This article is available in Osgoode Hall Law Journal: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol57/iss2/3
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律的“庄严平等”:1841-1853年加拿大北部民事法院的保守主义、激进主义和改革
19世纪中叶是普通法世界民事法庭改革的时代。尽管上加拿大要求改革的呼声不断,相邻的普通法司法管辖区也在进行改革,但为什么上加拿大的主要律师和政治家们如此不愿采取行动?答案可以从该省领导人的保守主义中找到,这不仅源于律师的法律培训,还源于整个上加拿大领导层的温和保守意识形态。在一个几乎前所未有的公众辩论时期,当对律师和法院的怨恨被表达出来,对法院和这个职业的激进批评正在出现时,上加拿大最有影响力的居民设法保持了政治控制,坚决拒绝在母国之前采取行动。这篇文章可在奥斯古德霍尔法律杂志:https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol57/iss2/3
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Provincial Constitutions, the Amending Formula, and Unilateral Amendments to the Constitution of Canada: An Analysis of Quebec’s Bill 96 Peace and Good Order: The Case for Indigenous Justice in Canada by Harold R. Johnson The Elusive Motive Requirement in Canada’s Terrorism Offences: Defining and Distinguishing Ideology, Religion, and Politics Policing in the Shadow of Legality: Pretext, Leveraging, and Investigation Cascades No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress by Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1