Do Private Schools in Australia Produce More Active Citizens?

Q4 Social Sciences Educational Practice & Theory Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.7459/EPT/43.1.02
L. Saha
{"title":"Do Private Schools in Australia Produce More Active Citizens?","authors":"L. Saha","doi":"10.7459/EPT/43.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this paper is whether type of Australian school attended makes a difference in student engagement in political and civic culture. Recently private schools have been said to “undermine cohesion” in Australian society. Similarly, it was argued over two decade\n ago that Australian private schools have skimmed the elite students from the government sector and now “impart to their pupils values and preferences of the culture from which they are drawn”, namely the dominant culture. Using data from the Youth Electoral Study (YES) survey,\n this analysis examines whether Australian students in government, Catholic and Independent schools differ in six political domains: voting commitment, positive attitude toward voting, political knowledge, political activism, political trust and civic volunteer behaviour. At the bivariate level,\n students in private schools generally show higher levels of political engagement compared to students in government schools in all domains. However, when family and school variables are controlled, the differences between these students in voting commitment, political knowledge and volunteer\n behaviour disappear. However students in Catholic schools show significantly higher levels in positive attitude toward voting and political activism. The effects of Independent schools disappear for five political domains but a significantly high level of political trust remains. Explanations\n for these patterns of outcomes are put forward, and directions for future research are explored.","PeriodicalId":35223,"journal":{"name":"Educational Practice & Theory","volume":"43 1","pages":"5-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/EPT/43.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focus of this paper is whether type of Australian school attended makes a difference in student engagement in political and civic culture. Recently private schools have been said to “undermine cohesion” in Australian society. Similarly, it was argued over two decade ago that Australian private schools have skimmed the elite students from the government sector and now “impart to their pupils values and preferences of the culture from which they are drawn”, namely the dominant culture. Using data from the Youth Electoral Study (YES) survey, this analysis examines whether Australian students in government, Catholic and Independent schools differ in six political domains: voting commitment, positive attitude toward voting, political knowledge, political activism, political trust and civic volunteer behaviour. At the bivariate level, students in private schools generally show higher levels of political engagement compared to students in government schools in all domains. However, when family and school variables are controlled, the differences between these students in voting commitment, political knowledge and volunteer behaviour disappear. However students in Catholic schools show significantly higher levels in positive attitude toward voting and political activism. The effects of Independent schools disappear for five political domains but a significantly high level of political trust remains. Explanations for these patterns of outcomes are put forward, and directions for future research are explored.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚私立学校培养出更积极的公民吗?
本文的重点是就读的澳大利亚学校类型是否会影响学生对政治和公民文化的参与。最近有人说私立学校“破坏了澳大利亚社会的凝聚力”。同样,20多年前有人认为,澳大利亚私立学校从政府部门抽调了精英学生,现在“向学生传授他们所处文化的价值观和偏好”,即主导文化。利用青年选举研究(YES)调查的数据,该分析考察了政府、天主教和独立学校的澳大利亚学生在六个政治领域是否存在差异:投票承诺、对投票的积极态度、政治知识、政治激进主义、政治信任和公民志愿者行为。在双变量水平上,私立学校的学生在所有领域的政治参与程度通常高于公立学校的学生。然而,当家庭和学校变量得到控制时,这些学生在投票承诺、政治知识和志愿者行为方面的差异就会消失。然而,天主教学校的学生对投票和政治激进主义的积极态度明显更高。独立学校的影响在五个政治领域消失了,但政治信任水平仍然很高。对这些结果模式提出了解释,并探讨了未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Practice & Theory
Educational Practice & Theory Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Educational Practice and Theory in its 40th year of publication continues as an important independent forum for original ideas in education research relevant to aspects of education including K-12 schools, education reforms, teaching methods and educational leadership. Educational Practice and Theory is: -a refereed journal with a distinguished panel of consulting editors; -comparative in focus; -innovative, path-finding and provocative; -diverse with reports on a wide range of countries and themes, and -applied and theoretical.
期刊最新文献
Teachers’ Beliefs About Grading, Grades, and Student Classroom Conduct Decision-Making Instruction: Rural Teachers’ Challenges and Perceptions of Robert Stahl’s Decision-Making Materials in the Social Studies Classroom Humor in Education: Exploring Its Complexities and Its Possibilities Notes and Comments Teachers as a Source of Support: Perceptions of Parents of Children With ADHD During COVID-19 Distance Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1