{"title":"TWO PERSPECTIVES ON THE ACT ON MUSEUMS","authors":"Alicja Jagielska-Burduk, Piotr Stec","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.3455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper the analysis of two newly published\ncommentaries (2021) on the Act on Museums is conducted:\nthe first commentary by A. Barbasiewicz, a lawyer\nspecializing in cultural heritage, and the other by a team\nof scholars: Z. Cieślik, I. Gredka-Ligarska, P. Gwoździewicz-\n-Matan, I. Lipowicz, A. Matan, K. Zeidler specializing\nin administrative proceedings and legal protection of\nhistoric monuments. Both publications represent various\nperspectives on the same issue, thus complementing one\nanother. The difference in the approach makes them both\nuseful to experienced practitioners on the one hand and\nthose who happen to confront these topics for the first time\none the other. Importantly, both have been written in a clear\nlanguage comprehensible to non-lawyers. Their high-rating\ncannot be diminished by the few critical remarks formulated\nin the paper.\n\n","PeriodicalId":36577,"journal":{"name":"Muzealnictwo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muzealnictwo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.3455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the paper the analysis of two newly published
commentaries (2021) on the Act on Museums is conducted:
the first commentary by A. Barbasiewicz, a lawyer
specializing in cultural heritage, and the other by a team
of scholars: Z. Cieślik, I. Gredka-Ligarska, P. Gwoździewicz-
-Matan, I. Lipowicz, A. Matan, K. Zeidler specializing
in administrative proceedings and legal protection of
historic monuments. Both publications represent various
perspectives on the same issue, thus complementing one
another. The difference in the approach makes them both
useful to experienced practitioners on the one hand and
those who happen to confront these topics for the first time
one the other. Importantly, both have been written in a clear
language comprehensible to non-lawyers. Their high-rating
cannot be diminished by the few critical remarks formulated
in the paper.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
