Energy-conserving cryptocurrency response during the COVID-19 pandemic and amid the Russia–Ukraine conflict

IF 5.7 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Risk Finance Pub Date : 2022-12-22 DOI:10.1108/jrf-06-2022-0161
Emna Mnif, Khaireddine Mouakhar, Anis Jarboui
{"title":"Energy-conserving cryptocurrency response during the COVID-19 pandemic and amid the Russia–Ukraine conflict","authors":"Emna Mnif, Khaireddine Mouakhar, Anis Jarboui","doi":"10.1108/jrf-06-2022-0161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe mining process is essential in cryptocurrency networks. However, it consumes considerable electrical energy, which is undoubtedly harmful to the environment. In response, energy-conserving cryptocurrency projects with reduced energy requirements or based on renewable energies have been developed. Recently, the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine ignited an unprecedented upheaval in financial products, especially in cryptocurrency and energy markets. Therefore, the paper aims to explore the response of these energy-conserving cryptocurrencies to the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine conflict.Design/methodology/approachThis paper investigates the response of these energy-conserving cryptocurrencies to the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine conflict. Their competitiveness is compared with conventional ones by analyzing their efficiency through multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis and automatic variance ratio during the COVID-19 and Russian invasion periods.FindingsThe empirical results show that all investigated energy-conserving cryptocurrencies negatively responded to the pandemic and positively reacted to the Russian invasion. On the other hand, all conventional cryptocurrencies reacted negatively to the COVID-19 pandemic and the amid-Russian attack. Besides, Bitcoin and SolarCoin were the least inefficient before the outbreak of COVID-19. Nevertheless, the Ethereum market became the most efficient after the pandemic spread. Similarly, the efficiency of Ripple was the most significant during the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The energy crisis caused by Russia benefited the efficiency of the studied energy-conserving cryptocurrencies.Practical implicationsThis research is of interest to investors seeking opportunities in these energy-conserving cryptocurrencies and policymakers working to implement reforms to improve their market efficiency and promote long-term financial market growth.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors' knowledge, the behavior of cryptocurrencies based on renewable and reduced energy during the recent conflict between Russia and Ukraine has not been explored.","PeriodicalId":46579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrf-06-2022-0161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PurposeThe mining process is essential in cryptocurrency networks. However, it consumes considerable electrical energy, which is undoubtedly harmful to the environment. In response, energy-conserving cryptocurrency projects with reduced energy requirements or based on renewable energies have been developed. Recently, the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine ignited an unprecedented upheaval in financial products, especially in cryptocurrency and energy markets. Therefore, the paper aims to explore the response of these energy-conserving cryptocurrencies to the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine conflict.Design/methodology/approachThis paper investigates the response of these energy-conserving cryptocurrencies to the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine conflict. Their competitiveness is compared with conventional ones by analyzing their efficiency through multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis and automatic variance ratio during the COVID-19 and Russian invasion periods.FindingsThe empirical results show that all investigated energy-conserving cryptocurrencies negatively responded to the pandemic and positively reacted to the Russian invasion. On the other hand, all conventional cryptocurrencies reacted negatively to the COVID-19 pandemic and the amid-Russian attack. Besides, Bitcoin and SolarCoin were the least inefficient before the outbreak of COVID-19. Nevertheless, the Ethereum market became the most efficient after the pandemic spread. Similarly, the efficiency of Ripple was the most significant during the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The energy crisis caused by Russia benefited the efficiency of the studied energy-conserving cryptocurrencies.Practical implicationsThis research is of interest to investors seeking opportunities in these energy-conserving cryptocurrencies and policymakers working to implement reforms to improve their market efficiency and promote long-term financial market growth.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors' knowledge, the behavior of cryptocurrencies based on renewable and reduced energy during the recent conflict between Russia and Ukraine has not been explored.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫情期间和俄乌冲突期间的节能加密货币应对措施
目的挖掘过程在加密货币网络中至关重要。然而,它消耗了大量的电能,这无疑对环境有害。作为回应,已经开发了能源需求降低或基于可再生能源的节能加密货币项目。最近,新冠肺炎疫情和俄罗斯入侵乌克兰引发了金融产品的空前动荡,尤其是加密货币和能源市场。因此,本文旨在探讨这些节能加密货币对新冠肺炎疫情和俄乌冲突的反应。设计/方法论/方法本文研究了这些节能加密货币对新冠肺炎疫情和俄罗斯-乌克兰冲突的反应。在新冠肺炎和俄罗斯入侵期间,通过多重分形去趋势波动分析和自动方差比分析其效率,将其与传统竞争对手进行比较。发现实证结果显示,所有被调查的节能加密货币对疫情都有负面反应,对俄罗斯入侵都有积极反应。另一方面,所有传统加密货币都对新冠肺炎疫情和俄罗斯中部袭击做出了负面反应。此外,比特币和SolarCoin在新冠肺炎爆发前效率最低。尽管如此,以太坊市场在疫情蔓延后成为效率最高的市场。同样,Ripple的效率在俄罗斯和乌克兰冲突期间也是最显著的。俄罗斯引发的能源危机有利于所研究的节能加密货币的效率。实际含义这项研究对在这些节能加密货币中寻求机会的投资者和致力于实施改革以提高市场效率和促进长期金融市场增长的政策制定者感兴趣。原创性/价值据作者所知,在俄罗斯和乌克兰最近的冲突中,基于可再生能源和减少能源的加密货币的行为尚未被探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Risk Finance
Journal of Risk Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Risk Finance provides a rigorous forum for the publication of high quality peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research articles, by both academic and industry experts, related to financial risks and risk management. Articles, including review articles, empirical and conceptual, which display thoughtful, accurate research and be rigorous in all regards, are most welcome on the following topics: -Securitization; derivatives and structured financial products -Financial risk management -Regulation of risk management -Risk and corporate governance -Liability management -Systemic risk -Cryptocurrency and risk management -Credit arbitrage methods -Corporate social responsibility and risk management -Enterprise risk management -FinTech and risk -Insurtech -Regtech -Blockchain and risk -Climate change and risk
期刊最新文献
Contagion in the Euro area sovereign CDS market: a spatial approach Environment, social and governance (ESG) performance and CDS spreads: the role of country sustainability Spillover effects of CEO performance-induced removal on competitor CEOs' firms' financial policies Capital structure and default risk of small and medium enterprises: evidence from Algeria Rippling effect of liquidity risk in the sovereign term structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1