Fair privacy: how college students perceive fair privacy protection in online datasets

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Information Communication & Society Pub Date : 2023-01-12 DOI:10.1080/1369118X.2023.2166361
Yu-Li Tao, Wendy Wang
{"title":"Fair privacy: how college students perceive fair privacy protection in online datasets","authors":"Yu-Li Tao, Wendy Wang","doi":"10.1080/1369118X.2023.2166361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With the wide use of social media and other online services, people are getting more concerned about online privacy. Social media platforms and other online companies are collecting users’ information for various purposes, including targeted advertising. While these data are anonymous, it is possible to identify people through publicly available information and machine learning algorithms. Members of some groups are more vulnerable to such privacy attacks and more likely to be identified. This raises a concern regarding the fair or equitable protection of online privacy, or the protection of all online users’ instead of most users’ private information. This research addresses this relatively new topic from the sociological perspective and focuses on fair privacy protection in online datasets. Questionnaire data show that college students rate the current privacy protection in online datasets low, but they have great support for general privacy protection and greater support for fair privacy protection. Factors that affect their support for general and fair privacy protection include prior cautious online behavior and how essential they rate company practice and government policies that ensure fair privacy. When they perceive a lack of fair privacy in online datasets, most of them would reduce or stop using certain online services. Factors affecting such reactions include prior cautious online behavior, hours on social media, the perception of being included in online datasets, and perceived importance of fair privacy policies. The findings highlight the pivotal role of institutional privacy measures, namely fair privacy company practice and government policies, especially the latter.","PeriodicalId":48335,"journal":{"name":"Information Communication & Society","volume":"26 1","pages":"974 - 989"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Communication & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2166361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the wide use of social media and other online services, people are getting more concerned about online privacy. Social media platforms and other online companies are collecting users’ information for various purposes, including targeted advertising. While these data are anonymous, it is possible to identify people through publicly available information and machine learning algorithms. Members of some groups are more vulnerable to such privacy attacks and more likely to be identified. This raises a concern regarding the fair or equitable protection of online privacy, or the protection of all online users’ instead of most users’ private information. This research addresses this relatively new topic from the sociological perspective and focuses on fair privacy protection in online datasets. Questionnaire data show that college students rate the current privacy protection in online datasets low, but they have great support for general privacy protection and greater support for fair privacy protection. Factors that affect their support for general and fair privacy protection include prior cautious online behavior and how essential they rate company practice and government policies that ensure fair privacy. When they perceive a lack of fair privacy in online datasets, most of them would reduce or stop using certain online services. Factors affecting such reactions include prior cautious online behavior, hours on social media, the perception of being included in online datasets, and perceived importance of fair privacy policies. The findings highlight the pivotal role of institutional privacy measures, namely fair privacy company practice and government policies, especially the latter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公平隐私:大学生如何看待在线数据集中的公平隐私保护
随着社交媒体和其他网络服务的广泛使用,人们越来越关注网络隐私问题。社交媒体平台和其他网络公司正在收集用户信息,用于各种目的,包括定向广告。虽然这些数据是匿名的,但可以通过公开信息和机器学习算法来识别人。某些群体的成员更容易受到此类隐私攻击,也更容易被识别。这引起了对公平或公平地保护在线隐私的关注,或者保护所有在线用户而不是大多数用户的私人信息。本研究从社会学的角度探讨了这一相对较新的主题,并着重于在线数据集中的公平隐私保护。问卷调查数据显示,大学生对当前网络数据集中隐私保护的评价较低,但对一般隐私保护的支持度较高,对公平隐私保护的支持度较高。影响他们支持一般和公平的隐私保护的因素包括先前的谨慎上网行为,以及他们对确保公平隐私的公司做法和政府政策的重要性的评价。当他们认为在线数据集缺乏公平的隐私时,他们中的大多数人会减少或停止使用某些在线服务。影响这种反应的因素包括先前的谨慎上网行为、在社交媒体上的时间、被纳入在线数据集的感觉,以及对公平隐私政策重要性的感知。研究结果强调了机构隐私措施的关键作用,即公平的隐私公司实践和政府政策,尤其是后者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: Drawing together the most current work upon the social, economic, and cultural impact of the emerging properties of the new information and communications technologies, this journal positions itself at the centre of contemporary debates about the information age. Information, Communication & Society (iCS) transcends cultural and geographical boundaries as it explores a diverse range of issues relating to the development and application of information and communications technologies (ICTs), asking such questions as: -What are the new and evolving forms of social software? What direction will these forms take? -ICTs facilitating globalization and how might this affect conceptions of local identity, ethnic differences, and regional sub-cultures? -Are ICTs leading to an age of electronic surveillance and social control? What are the implications for policing criminal activity, citizen privacy and public expression? -How are ICTs affecting daily life and social structures such as the family, work and organization, commerce and business, education, health care, and leisure activities? -To what extent do the virtual worlds constructed using ICTs impact on the construction of objects, spaces, and entities in the material world? iCS analyses such questions from a global, interdisciplinary perspective in contributions of the very highest quality from scholars and practitioners in the social sciences, gender and cultural studies, communication and media studies, as well as in the information and computer sciences.
期刊最新文献
Traveling technology and perverted logics: conceptualizing Palantir’s expansion into health as sphere transgression Caring for data in later life – the datafication of ageing as a matter of care Predicting user engagement with anti-gender, homophobic and sexist social media posts – a choice-based conjoint study in Hungary and Germany #Narcissisticabuse: sharing personal and educational narratives during domestic violence awareness month Why are sector transgressions so hard to govern? Reflections from Europe’s pandemic experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1