The effect of maternal health conditions on maternal morbidity in women with a prior cesarean: the role of elective repeat cesarean delivery

M. Fridman, L. Korst, Elizabeth S. Lawton, N. Greene, Samia Saeb, Lisa A. Nicholas, K. Gregory
{"title":"The effect of maternal health conditions on maternal morbidity in women with a prior cesarean: the role of elective repeat cesarean delivery","authors":"M. Fridman, L. Korst, Elizabeth S. Lawton, N. Greene, Samia Saeb, Lisa A. Nicholas, K. Gregory","doi":"10.5430/jer.v5n2p17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We evaluated women with a prior cesarean delivery (CD) who were eligible for elective repeat CD or trial of labor to test whether the risk of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) was: 1) directly associated with important pre-existing and gestational conditions or 2) indirectly associated (significantly increased or decreased) with the decision to undergo elective repeat CD.Methods: Women with a prior CD who had inborn, liveborn, term, singleton, vertex deliveries were identified in California 2010-2011 hospital discharge datasets. Using discharge codes, this population was stratified into two groups: attempted labor and elective repeat CD. A mediation model (stratified by younger vs. older women [>35 years]) was built for each of the following maternal conditions (exposure): chronic/gestational diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic/gestational hypertension, heart disease, obesity, and mental health diagnoses. Elective repeat CD was the mediator and SMM was the outcome.Results: Of 141,535 eligible deliveries, 72.7% had an elective repeat CD; 2.3% had SMM, which occurred in 2.2% of younger vs. 2.6% of older women. For younger and older women respectively, the modeled total effect odds ratios (95% CI) for heart disease were: 10.7 (8.5, 13.5) and 8.8 (6.4, 12.2); for hypertension: 1.7 (1.4, 1.9) and 2.0 (1.6, 2.4); and for mental health diagnoses: 1.9 (1.6, 2.3) and 1.7 (1.3, 2.3). Neither DM nor obesity demonstrated a direct effect. Odds ratios for indirect effects were negligible for all models.Conclusion: Among women with a prior CD, in the presence of important health conditions, the increased risk of SMM mediated by an elective repeat CD was negligible.","PeriodicalId":91116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epidemiological research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epidemiological research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jer.v5n2p17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We evaluated women with a prior cesarean delivery (CD) who were eligible for elective repeat CD or trial of labor to test whether the risk of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) was: 1) directly associated with important pre-existing and gestational conditions or 2) indirectly associated (significantly increased or decreased) with the decision to undergo elective repeat CD.Methods: Women with a prior CD who had inborn, liveborn, term, singleton, vertex deliveries were identified in California 2010-2011 hospital discharge datasets. Using discharge codes, this population was stratified into two groups: attempted labor and elective repeat CD. A mediation model (stratified by younger vs. older women [>35 years]) was built for each of the following maternal conditions (exposure): chronic/gestational diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic/gestational hypertension, heart disease, obesity, and mental health diagnoses. Elective repeat CD was the mediator and SMM was the outcome.Results: Of 141,535 eligible deliveries, 72.7% had an elective repeat CD; 2.3% had SMM, which occurred in 2.2% of younger vs. 2.6% of older women. For younger and older women respectively, the modeled total effect odds ratios (95% CI) for heart disease were: 10.7 (8.5, 13.5) and 8.8 (6.4, 12.2); for hypertension: 1.7 (1.4, 1.9) and 2.0 (1.6, 2.4); and for mental health diagnoses: 1.9 (1.6, 2.3) and 1.7 (1.3, 2.3). Neither DM nor obesity demonstrated a direct effect. Odds ratios for indirect effects were negligible for all models.Conclusion: Among women with a prior CD, in the presence of important health conditions, the increased risk of SMM mediated by an elective repeat CD was negligible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产妇健康状况对既往剖宫产妇女产妇发病率的影响:选择性重复剖宫产的作用
背景:我们对有过剖宫产史(CD)且符合选择性重复剖宫产或分娩试验条件的妇女进行评估,以检验严重产妇发病率(SMM)的风险是否:1)与重要的既往疾病和妊娠期疾病直接相关,或2)与选择选择性重复剖宫产的决定间接相关(显著增加或减少)。在加州2010-2011年医院出院数据集中确定了出生、活产、足月、单胎和顶点分娩的既往乳糜泻妇女。使用出院代码,将该人群分为两组:尝试分娩和选择性重复CD。针对以下每一种产妇情况(暴露)建立了一个中介模型(按年轻妇女和老年妇女分层[bb - 35岁]):慢性/妊娠糖尿病(DM)、慢性/妊娠高血压、心脏病、肥胖和心理健康诊断。选择性重复CD是中介,SMM是结果。结果:在141535例符合条件的分娩中,72.7%有选择性重复CD;2.3%的女性患有SMM,其中年轻女性为2.2%,老年女性为2.6%。对于年轻女性和老年女性,心脏病的模型总效应优势比(95% CI)分别为:10.7(8.5,13.5)和8.8 (6.4,12.2);高血压:1.7(1.4,1.9)和2.0 (1.6,2.4);心理健康诊断:1.9(1.6,2.3)和1.7(1.3,2.3)。糖尿病和肥胖都没有直接影响。在所有模型中,间接效应的优势比都可以忽略不计。结论:在既往有乳糜泄的妇女中,在存在重要健康状况的情况下,选择性重复乳糜泄介导的SMM风险增加可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forecasting chronic diseases in Africans – Evidence from an immigrant population cohort experience A review of mother-child and birth cohort studies in the Middle East Area Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichiacoli and Salmonella isolated from retail broiler chicken carcasses in Zambia Seroprevalence of human Brucellosis and associated risk factors among high-risk occupations in Mbeya Region of Tanzania The effect of maternal health conditions on maternal morbidity in women with a prior cesarean: the role of elective repeat cesarean delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1