Visual and orthographic processing in Arabic word recognition among dyslexic and typical readers

Q1 Arts and Humanities Writing Systems Research Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/17586801.2020.1764159
Lateefeh Maroun, Raphiq Ibrahim, Z. Eviatar
{"title":"Visual and orthographic processing in Arabic word recognition among dyslexic and typical readers","authors":"Lateefeh Maroun, Raphiq Ibrahim, Z. Eviatar","doi":"10.1080/17586801.2020.1764159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The main objective of this research was to assess the influence of visual processing on Arabic reading accuracy and fluency of word recognition in a deep (unvowelled) version and a shallow (vowelled) version of the Arabic script on typical and dyslexic readers. We tested three groups, typically reading 6th graders, dyslexic 6th graders, and typically reading 4th graders, who were matched on reading levels with the dyslexic group. In addition to phonological decoding, we tested orthographic and morphological abilities, as well as nonlinguistic visual abilities. The results showed that overall, the Dyslexic group performed worse on the tests of phonology and orthography than both groups of typical readers, but better than the younger readers on the test of morphological sensitivity. The Dyslexics also performed equivalently to the younger readers on the nonlinguistic visual tests, and both were worse than the age matched controls. Regression analyses revealed that although phonological decoding is the best predictor of accuracy in reading both words and nonwords, orthographic abilities also contribute significantly to the variance. In addition, orthographic abilities were the best predictor of the speed of reading words and nonwords for all groups. Vowelled script slowed recognition and lowered accuracy for all groups.","PeriodicalId":39225,"journal":{"name":"Writing Systems Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"142 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17586801.2020.1764159","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2020.1764159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT The main objective of this research was to assess the influence of visual processing on Arabic reading accuracy and fluency of word recognition in a deep (unvowelled) version and a shallow (vowelled) version of the Arabic script on typical and dyslexic readers. We tested three groups, typically reading 6th graders, dyslexic 6th graders, and typically reading 4th graders, who were matched on reading levels with the dyslexic group. In addition to phonological decoding, we tested orthographic and morphological abilities, as well as nonlinguistic visual abilities. The results showed that overall, the Dyslexic group performed worse on the tests of phonology and orthography than both groups of typical readers, but better than the younger readers on the test of morphological sensitivity. The Dyslexics also performed equivalently to the younger readers on the nonlinguistic visual tests, and both were worse than the age matched controls. Regression analyses revealed that although phonological decoding is the best predictor of accuracy in reading both words and nonwords, orthographic abilities also contribute significantly to the variance. In addition, orthographic abilities were the best predictor of the speed of reading words and nonwords for all groups. Vowelled script slowed recognition and lowered accuracy for all groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读障碍和典型读者在阿拉伯语单词识别中的视觉和正字法处理
摘要:本研究的主要目的是评估视觉处理对典型和诵读困难读者在深度(无元音)版本和浅(元音)版本阿拉伯语阅读准确性和单词识别流畅性的影响。我们测试了三组,典型阅读的六年级学生,诵读困难的六年级学生,和典型阅读的四年级学生,他们的阅读水平与诵读困难组相匹配。除了语音解码,我们还测试了正字法和形态学能力,以及非语言视觉能力。结果显示,总体而言,诵读困难组在音韵学和正字法测试中的表现比两组正常阅读者都差,但在词形敏感性测试中却比年轻阅读者好。在非语言视觉测试中,诵读困难患者的表现也与年轻读者相当,但两者都比同龄对照组差。回归分析显示,虽然语音解码是阅读单词和非单词准确性的最佳预测指标,但正字法能力也对差异有显著影响。此外,正字法能力是所有小组阅读单词和非单词速度的最佳预测指标。元音字母减慢了所有组的识别速度并降低了准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Writing Systems Research
Writing Systems Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Language ideologies of the transcription system Zhuyin fuhao: a symbol of Taiwanese identity Transcoding number words by bilingual speakers of Arabic: writing multi-digit numbers in a units-decades inverting language Writing between languages: the case of Arabizi Spelling patterns of German 4th graders in French vowels: insights into spelling solutions within and across two alphabetic writing systems Literacy and the language awareness hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1