“Ethnicity” of the Scythians: Problems in the Aspects of Ontology and Gnoseology

Dobrovolskiy Lubomir S., Kazhenova Gulnar T., Umitkaliev Ulan U.
{"title":"“Ethnicity” of the Scythians: Problems in the Aspects of Ontology and Gnoseology","authors":"Dobrovolskiy Lubomir S., Kazhenova Gulnar T., Umitkaliev Ulan U.","doi":"10.21209/1996-7853-2022-17-3-89-99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work is devoted to the problem of the archaeological definition of the ethnos in connection with the range of questions of the genesis of the Scythians and their anthropological composition in connection with the eastern migration impulses. The objective is to study the development of this set of problems, as well as to consider the possibilities of further research in the aspect of competing hypotheses by systematizing and interpreting the data of history, archeology and physical anthropology. The reason for the unresolved issue of the origin of the Scythians is the lack of a generally accepted content of the concepts of “Scythian” and “Scythian culture”, as well as “Scythian archaeological culture”, due to the blurring of the boundaries of the areas of distribution of monuments of the “Scythian type culture”. The reason for the diversity of opinions about the physical appearance of the Scythians is the lack of a sufficient amount of anthropological material and the difference in interpretations of morphological relationships and lines of development. We consider the study of the genesis of the Scythians and the development of the Scythian culture from the perspective of migrations within the framework of the Srubna-Andronovo cultural and historical community to be a promising direction. It is necessary to define both multi-vector pulsating migrations and the “Scythian area” as a vast material and cultural (“ethnic, cultural and historical”) landscape and the environment within which they occurred. It is extremely important to single out compact typological variants and their cultural and chronological boundaries within the framework of the cultural community of the Scythians in the south of Eastern Europe, Sauromatians and Saks. In terms of establishing the Scythian area and identifying ethnic and cultural components, it is necessary to carefully localize the settled zones on its borders, study trans-boundary zones, the localization of which is confined to isolated physical and geographical structures and zones of integration of material production, and identify the patterns and specifics of the course of ethnic and cultural processes within and on the borders of large trans-zonal territories.","PeriodicalId":33580,"journal":{"name":"Gumanitarnyi vektor","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gumanitarnyi vektor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2022-17-3-89-99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The work is devoted to the problem of the archaeological definition of the ethnos in connection with the range of questions of the genesis of the Scythians and their anthropological composition in connection with the eastern migration impulses. The objective is to study the development of this set of problems, as well as to consider the possibilities of further research in the aspect of competing hypotheses by systematizing and interpreting the data of history, archeology and physical anthropology. The reason for the unresolved issue of the origin of the Scythians is the lack of a generally accepted content of the concepts of “Scythian” and “Scythian culture”, as well as “Scythian archaeological culture”, due to the blurring of the boundaries of the areas of distribution of monuments of the “Scythian type culture”. The reason for the diversity of opinions about the physical appearance of the Scythians is the lack of a sufficient amount of anthropological material and the difference in interpretations of morphological relationships and lines of development. We consider the study of the genesis of the Scythians and the development of the Scythian culture from the perspective of migrations within the framework of the Srubna-Andronovo cultural and historical community to be a promising direction. It is necessary to define both multi-vector pulsating migrations and the “Scythian area” as a vast material and cultural (“ethnic, cultural and historical”) landscape and the environment within which they occurred. It is extremely important to single out compact typological variants and their cultural and chronological boundaries within the framework of the cultural community of the Scythians in the south of Eastern Europe, Sauromatians and Saks. In terms of establishing the Scythian area and identifying ethnic and cultural components, it is necessary to carefully localize the settled zones on its borders, study trans-boundary zones, the localization of which is confined to isolated physical and geographical structures and zones of integration of material production, and identify the patterns and specifics of the course of ethnic and cultural processes within and on the borders of large trans-zonal territories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯基泰人的“民族性”:本体论和Gnoseology方面的问题
这项工作致力于解决与斯基泰人的起源及其与东部移民冲动有关的人类学组成的一系列问题有关的民族考古定义问题。目的是研究这一系列问题的发展,并通过系统化和解释历史、考古学和体质人类学的数据,考虑在相互竞争的假设方面进行进一步研究的可能性。斯基泰人起源问题尚未解决的原因是,由于“斯基泰式文化”纪念碑分布区域的边界模糊,“斯基泰人”和“斯基台文化”以及“斯基台人考古文化”的概念缺乏普遍接受的内容。关于斯基泰人外貌的观点之所以多样,是因为缺乏足够数量的人类学材料,以及对形态关系和发展路线的解释存在差异。我们认为,在Srubna Andronovo文化和历史共同体的框架内,从迁徙的角度研究斯基泰人的起源和斯基泰文化的发展是一个很有前途的方向。有必要将多媒介脉动迁徙和“斯基泰人地区”定义为一个巨大的物质和文化(“种族、文化和历史”)景观以及迁徙发生的环境。在东欧南部的斯基泰人、索罗曼人和萨克斯人的文化共同体框架内,找出紧凑的类型学变体及其文化和时间界限是极其重要的。在建立斯基泰人地区和确定民族和文化组成部分方面,有必要仔细定位其边界上的定居区,研究跨界区,其本地化仅限于孤立的物理和地理结构以及物质生产一体化区,并确定大型跨地区领土内部和边界上的种族和文化进程的模式和具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Heuristic Potential of Methodological Approaches to the Study of “Nature – Society” System Problem of Personal Data Security and the Phenomenon of Post-Privacy in the Digital Society Digital Culture and Value Clash on TikTok: ‘Dancing Girl’ vs. Radical Feminist Traditional Values of Russian Society in the Digital Age Subjects of the “Knowledge Model of the Quality of Life” in the Concepts of Post-Industrialism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1