God and Worldview according to al-Attas and Wall

Usmanul Khakim, Teguh Kurniyanto, Mahendra Utama Cahya Ramadhan, Muhammad Habiburrahman, Muhammad Iksan Rahmadian
{"title":"God and Worldview according to al-Attas and Wall","authors":"Usmanul Khakim, Teguh Kurniyanto, Mahendra Utama Cahya Ramadhan, Muhammad Habiburrahman, Muhammad Iksan Rahmadian","doi":"10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.4853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to elaborate the thoughts of al Attas and Thomas F Wall in understanding of God; both of which agree to consider God as a central concept ( core belief ) in the structure of their theory of worldview. Even so, their concept of God cannot be said to be the same, where al Attas accepts religious institutions (read; Islam) and Wall although apreciated God but rejected religion (agnostic). As a result, both worldviews have different spectrums in the all concepts included concept of reality, human beings and science; where these are rooted in the concept of God. Al Attas and Wall are contemporary philosophers who are concerned in the field of worldview theory, where al Attas presents the Islamic worldview and the Wall as a representation of the Western worldview. This article is a library research using a comparative analysis of the thoughts of two figures; besides that, contain analysis is also needed to interpret what is written in the works of the two scholars. The conclusion of this article is that al Attas' concept of God is based on revelation ( khabar sadiq ), while Wall builds the concept of God rationally. Al Attas came to the conclusion that God is One; all His perfect attributes exist conclusively, while Wall doubts the existence of God, so Wall  attempted to undestand God  metaphorically (God as myth).","PeriodicalId":53315,"journal":{"name":"Tsaqafah","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tsaqafah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.4853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article aims to elaborate the thoughts of al Attas and Thomas F Wall in understanding of God; both of which agree to consider God as a central concept ( core belief ) in the structure of their theory of worldview. Even so, their concept of God cannot be said to be the same, where al Attas accepts religious institutions (read; Islam) and Wall although apreciated God but rejected religion (agnostic). As a result, both worldviews have different spectrums in the all concepts included concept of reality, human beings and science; where these are rooted in the concept of God. Al Attas and Wall are contemporary philosophers who are concerned in the field of worldview theory, where al Attas presents the Islamic worldview and the Wall as a representation of the Western worldview. This article is a library research using a comparative analysis of the thoughts of two figures; besides that, contain analysis is also needed to interpret what is written in the works of the two scholars. The conclusion of this article is that al Attas' concept of God is based on revelation ( khabar sadiq ), while Wall builds the concept of God rationally. Al Attas came to the conclusion that God is One; all His perfect attributes exist conclusively, while Wall doubts the existence of God, so Wall  attempted to undestand God  metaphorically (God as myth).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《阿塔斯与长城》中的上帝与世界观
本文旨在阐述阿塔斯和托马斯·沃尔在理解上帝方面的思想;他们都同意将上帝视为世界观结构中的一个中心概念(核心信仰)。即便如此,他们对上帝的概念也不能说是一样的,阿塔斯接受宗教机构(读作伊斯兰教),而沃尔虽然崇拜上帝,但拒绝宗教(不可知论者)。因此,两种世界观在包括现实观、人观和科学观在内的所有概念中都有不同的光谱;这些都植根于上帝的概念。阿塔斯和沃尔是当代关注世界观理论领域的哲学家,阿塔斯将伊斯兰世界观和沃尔作为西方世界观的代表。本文是一篇利用图书馆学研究的两位人物思想的比较分析;除此之外,还需要对两位学者的著作进行包容分析。本文的结论是,阿塔斯的上帝观是建立在启示(khabar sadiq)的基础上的,而沃尔则理性地构建了上帝观。阿塔斯得出的结论是上帝是一体的;他所有的完美属性都是确凿存在的,而沃尔则怀疑上帝的存在,因此沃尔试图隐喻性地否定上帝(上帝是神话)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
TRADISI GHATIB BEGHANYUT SEBUAH PERADABAN ISLAM PADA MASYARAKAT SIAK SRI INDRAPURA, RIAU Hikayat Raja Pasai Sebagai Sumber Historiografi Menurut Perspektif Syed M. Naquib Al-Attas Antara Salafi dan Sufi: Tasawuf menurut Ibn Taimiyyah dan al-Qusyairi Hasan Langgulung Thought on Islamic Education Character Transformation of Naposo Nauli Bulung in Religious Practice in South Tapanuli Regency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1